Labour outsources digital policy, Tories turn up to finish it

Here's another manifesto - radically identical to all the others

Do tax avoidance, monopolistic business practices or your right to determine your digital identity bother you? Well don’t look for help in the new "digital manifesto" that the Labour Party launched this week. The audience for the crowdsourced "mashup" policy document is VCs, the media, and nervous unions – not you. The People’s Party has only a few very special people in mind.

Labour began the process behind the document “Number One in Digital” at Google’s Shoreditch "Campus" in London this year. Wonks and volunteers then held open sessions to gather ideas. So the wet, slightly New-Age-y Tory Think Tank Policy Exchange gets its suggestions incorporated. So too does the Google-funded lobby outfit Coadec, run by a former special advisor to George Osborne, Guy Levin. Coadec wants to repeal of laws around what it euphemistically calls the "sharing economy", which would benefit slave-wage car-hire company Uber. (Google is an investor in Uber.) How Labour is that?

Conservative digital policy left some tasty targets for a feisty opposition. But weirdly, they get praise. So the sprawling, new state-funded IT contractor GDS, which promised to do much more than beautified websites but has conspicuously under-delivered – is spared. In fact, it’s more than spared: Labour promises to expand GDS to beautify local government websites too. The well-intentioned GCloud/Cloudstore initiative, which was intended to open up government contracts to SMEs, isn’t mentioned.

There’s also some bad news for UK-educated programmers. The policy wonks want a special visa introduced – a “Programmers Passport” – so bosses could hire imported labour much more easily. That should really help swing the vital developer vote. Labour also wants VCs to get tax breaks – but there’s no mention of Google or Facebook’s tax avoidance.

Labour wonks also want to see an annual review of IP law – a permanent Hargreaves – and would like to see free broadband for all. But then who wouldn’t?

The document has a more traditional flavour in other parts, by advocating large transfers to state-funded bodies to spend on worthy digital causes. The "Digital Skills Taskforce" – an Ed Milliband creation, has a big input. No prizes for guessing what it wants – it wants lots of things that a Digital Skills Taskforce can do. Like, er, “establish a matching website to connect students with tech businesses across the UK”. More schemes for teaching teachers IT. (You’d think we led the world in literacy and numeracy). Other goals include “Create a Teach Text Next programme” and “provide central, online third sector mapping, signposting third sector tech initiatives”. The shady social enterprise sector – which really means state-funded charities – would get a big boost. Lily Cole received £200,000 of taxpayer’s money from one of these funds for her “wishing well”.

First off, define the digital economy – no, in a sensible way

All the tech manifestos vary by rhetoric, not substance, and they contain almost identical demands. My point isn’t to single out Labour – although this digital policy manifesto is as amateurish as all the other digital policy manifestos. There are a few problems here they all have in common.

Part of the trouble is the question. There isn’t really a "digital economy", just an economy. People need the best services, and these might well be analogue, such as an easily accessible helpline or service counter. Self-service isn’t really driving efficiencies in the public sector, because the low-hanging fruit has already been plucked. The marginalised and the vulnerable rely non-digital services, on meals on wheels, and you can’t replace that with a GIF. Once you put digits before people, you’re heading rapidly down a cul de sac.

Another part of the problem is the narrowness of the intellectual pool from which the wonks all sup. They represent what we might call "The Consultariat" – a consultant class that gets very excited about TED Talks, and has become very canny at positioning itself, via "sustainability" and now "innovation", at the front of the queue when money is being handed out.

Martha Lane Fox drafted the Tories’ digital strategy – and helped launched the Labour one, too. And they choose to follow the agenda set by lumbering overseas giants, which is what the 1990s and early 'noughties web companies now are. But what’s good for Google isn’t necessarily good for British technology companies.

So, Conservatives declare war on inefficiency and waste and promise to create a "bonfire of the quangos" back in 2010. They then go and create a sprawling new one, GDS, which makes a 1970s car plant look efficient and well-run, and expand other quangos, like the TSB. Labour talks piously about the dignity of labour, but swings into battle for Uber. It wants to be the party of inclusivity, but the digital document tells the 20 per cent of 'net refusenicks – those unwilling or unable to use web services – that the analogue services should be shut off.

It's all quite strange. People complain the Westminster parties are all identical – and here's another identical tech manifesto. People complain the parties have abandoned ordinary people – and here's one, just like the others, that expands the Consultant Class. And here's one that thinks politics can be invigorated just by saying "digital" over and over and over again. I'm Digital! More Digital than thou ...

Yes, and? ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • FTC urged to protect data privacy of women visiting abortion clinics
    As Supreme Court set to overturn Roe v Wade, safeguards on location info now more vital than ever

    Democrat senators have urged America's Federal Trade Commission to do something to protect the privacy of women after it emerged details of visits to abortion clinics were being sold by data brokers.

    Women's healthcare is an especially thorny issue right now after the Supreme Court voted in a leaked draft majority opinion to overturn Roe v Wade, a landmark ruling that declared women's rights to have an abortion are protected by the Fourteenth Amendment of the US Constitution.

    If the nation's top judges indeed vote to strike down that 1973 decision, individual states, at least, can set their own laws governing women's reproductive rights. Thirteen states already have so-called "trigger laws" in place prohibiting abortions – mostly with exceptions in certain conditions, such as if the pregnancy or childbirth endangers the mother's life – that will go into effect if Roe v Wade is torn up. People living in those states would, in theory, have to travel to another state where abortion is legal to carry out the procedure lawfully, although laws are also planned to ban that.

    Continue reading
  • Zuckerberg sued for alleged role in Cambridge Analytica data-slurp scandal
    I can prove CEO was 'personally involved in Facebook’s failure to protect privacy', DC AG insists

    Cambridge Analytica is back to haunt Mark Zuckerberg: Washington DC's Attorney General filed a lawsuit today directly accusing the Meta CEO of personal involvement in the abuses that led to the data-slurping scandal. 

    DC AG Karl Racine filed [PDF] the civil suit on Monday morning, saying his office's investigations found ample evidence Zuck could be held responsible for that 2018 cluster-fsck. For those who've put it out of mind, UK-based Cambridge Analytica harvested tens of millions of people's info via a third-party Facebook app, revealing a – at best – somewhat slipshod handling of netizens' privacy by the US tech giant.

    That year, Racine sued Facebook, claiming the social network was well aware of the analytics firm's antics yet failed to do anything meaningful until the data harvesting was covered by mainstream media. Facebook repeatedly stymied document production attempts, Racine claimed, and the paperwork it eventually handed over painted a trail he said led directly to Zuck. 

    Continue reading
  • Florida's content-moderation law kept on ice, likely unconstitutional, court says
    So cool you're into free speech because that includes taking down misinformation

    While the US Supreme Court considers an emergency petition to reinstate a preliminary injunction against Texas' social media law HB 20, the US Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday partially upheld a similar injunction against Florida's social media law, SB 7072.

    Both Florida and Texas last year passed laws that impose content moderation restrictions, editorial disclosure obligations, and user-data access requirements on large online social networks. The Republican governors of both states justified the laws by claiming that social media sites have been trying to censor conservative voices, an allegation that has not been supported by evidence.

    Multiple studies addressing this issue say right-wing folk aren't being censored. They have found that social media sites try to take down or block misinformation, which researchers say is more common from right-leaning sources.

    Continue reading
  • US-APAC trade deal leaves out Taiwan, military defense not ruled out
    All fun and games until the chip factories are in the crosshairs

    US President Joe Biden has heralded an Indo-Pacific trade deal signed by several nations that do not include Taiwan. At the same time, Biden warned China that America would help defend Taiwan from attack; it is home to a critical slice of the global chip industry, after all. 

    The agreement, known as the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF), is still in its infancy, with today's announcement enabling the United States and the other 12 participating countries to begin negotiating "rules of the road that ensure [US businesses] can compete in the Indo-Pacific," the White House said. 

    Along with America, other IPEF signatories are Australia, Brunei, India, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, New Zealand, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam. Combined, the White House said, the 13 countries participating in the IPEF make up 40 percent of the global economy. 

    Continue reading
  • 381,000-plus Kubernetes API servers 'exposed to internet'
    Firewall isn't a made-up word from the Hackers movie, people

    A large number of servers running the Kubernetes API have been left exposed to the internet, which is not great: they're potentially vulnerable to abuse.

    Nonprofit security organization The Shadowserver Foundation recently scanned 454,729 systems hosting the popular open-source platform for managing and orchestrating containers, finding that more than 381,645 – or about 84 percent – are accessible via the internet to varying degrees thus providing a cracked door into a corporate network.

    "While this does not mean that these instances are fully open or vulnerable to an attack, it is likely that this level of access was not intended and these instances are an unnecessarily exposed attack surface," Shadowserver's team stressed in a write-up. "They also allow for information leakage on version and build."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022