Internet of Things? Hold my beer, I got this: ARM crafts OS to rule them all

New mbed operating system tries to pave over chip rivalries to lure in IoT startups

ARM TechCon ARM will today announce a new operating system called mbed OS: it seeks to smooth over all the differences between various competing system-on-chips so that high-level applications can talk to sensors and other gizmos whether they're using silicon from Atmel, Marvell, ST, Freescale, NXP, and so on.

The software will be revealed at ARM TechCon 2014 in Santa Clara, California, on Wednesday morning, although it's not yet fully available. But here's what we've been told about it.

It essentially comes in two parts: in the bottom half, there's the mbed OS kernel running on system-on-chips in little devices: this OS provides the drivers, reacts to stuff happening around the hardware, and communicates with the outside world. Programmers can write software to run directly on top of the kernel; this code controls the operation of the device.

Then in the top half of the stack, there's server-side software called the mbed Device Server that runs on much larger x86 or ARM-powered computers. This connects high-level applications, such as a website back-end, to the individual devices; it allows large bits of software to manage and draw from lots of little gadgets that don't, individually, have much in the way of intelligence.

An internet-connected gateway, which could be a smartphone, tablet or a little box in a cupboard, talks to devices over short-range comms, such as Wi-Fi or Bluetooth, and then routes that information through to an mbed Device Server. That server could be in the cloud, or could be a local machine. A device could, if it's capable, skip past the gateway stage and go straight to the server. It's a flexible architecture.

A lot of this stack, particularly at the lower level, draws from ARM's mbed community that's been going since 2009: this is a big pile of resources and toolchains for building ARM microcontroller firmware using C and C++. We're told more than 70,000 programmers are signed up on the site, and have been working on thousands of projects for 30 or more prototyping and development boards supported by the mbed code.

Now, it appears, ARM's tying everything together, and packaged it so that high-level app developers can prototype stuff for ARM-powered sensors'n'gadgets faster – since there's a common, well-defined base from which to start.

The plan is to use open standards, such as HTTP and MQTT on top of TLS and DTLS, to deliver data securely between devices and whatever software is masterminding them. The software supports Bluetooth Smart; 2G, 3G, LTE and CDMA phone networks; Google Thread; Wi-Fi; and 6LoWPAN. It's understood ARM is not using an open-source library for its TLS cryptography.

The stack also hides away things like device availability: for example, high-level server-side software can request data from a sensor that may be sleeping to save energy, and eventually the information is received when the device is woken up, all of which is transparent to the high-level app. This simplifies the top level of the stack, which helps people write and release code to users a bit faster.

This may be upsetting news for engineers who enjoy getting their fingers dirty programming microcontrollers using assembly language, but the point of the mbed project has been to abstract the chaotic world of SoC design away from developers – leaving a cleaner, common interface to work with.

"Compilers these days are quite good," ARM's CTO, and company cofounder, Mike Muller told us.

"It's no longer the 1980s where you have to use assembly language; you can do it more efficiently now, and development time really matters."

Under the hood

The new mbed OS is designed for the Cortex-M family, ARM's series of 32-bit microcontroller cores. These can cost about $5 to $10 each, and range from the tiny M0 to the beefier M4 and M7. The mbed OS is not a port of an existing kernel, such as the L4 microkernel found running on the iPhone 6's ARM-based crypto-coprocessor, QNX found in various car dashboards, nor the ubiquitous ARM GNU/Linux and uClinux.

We're told the new OS uses ARM's code, plus drivers and source contributed by hardware manufacturers and the mbed community. As you'd expect from a microcontroller OS, it's small enough to fit within the constraints of a Cortex-M SoC. A typical M0+ package will have between 8KB and 128KB of flash storage, and up to 16KB of RAM, while running at up to 48MHz; your common-or-garden M4 SoCs go up to 180MHz, and include 32KB to 2MB of flash and up to 256KB of SRAM. We're assured the mbed OS fits within the flash space of its target devices.

The OS is event driven rather than a classic real-time OS, Zach Shelby, ARM's director of technical marketing for the Internet of Things, told us. What that means is that it is not a complex preemptive kernel that divides the processor into time slices; there's no context switching or timers with deadlines. Instead, mbed OS sleeps until an interrupt from a sensor or other peripheral wakes it up, it handles the event, makes a decision whether to trigger a signal higher up the stack, and then falls to sleep again.

If you're used to microcontroller-level development, this will come as no surprise. It's just good sense in a resource-constrained environment; a design that's supposed to save power. "Batteries don't follow Moore's Law," Shelby said, reminding us that today's mobile processors are still constrained by their tiny power sources.

Slide showing the software layers within the OS

mbed OS ... the components of the operating system

Above is ARM's diagram of the layers in mbed OS; essentially, as a developer, you fill in the blue blocks at the top: the applications and libraries. Below is the makeup of the mbed Device Server, which abstracts away the lower levels for software that talks to iOS and Android apps, or other services.

The idea here is so that people who are handy with C++, JavaScript, HTML, Swift and other languages for phones, tablets and desktops can prototype and build applications for fiddly hardware ultimately hidden away under the mbed stack. These programmers don't need to know about the undocumented registers and control bits, and the rivalries, plaguing the system-on-chip world; it's abstracted away by mbed, which tries to pave over the fragmentation.

“Today’s Internet of Things largely exist in isolation, and it has been impossible to realize a truly interconnected world where devices are interoperable with many different cloud services,” said Krisztian Flautner, ARM's general manager of its IoT business.

Slide showing how the server-side software fits together

The layers of the mbed server software ... your apps sit at the top

But what's it all for? A good question. In fact, ask a room of embedded engineering execs for examples of sensors and killer apps for the Internet of Things, and you may well end up sitting in a brief awkward silence. The fact is, we're still very much in the "build" part of "build it and they will come".

ARM is working with IBM on its Smart Cities. This means street lights being able to sense, using Wi-Fi or Bluetooth, how many people are nearby and adjusting their lighting accordingly, via a system running mbed Device Server. This can be more fine-grained that relying on primitive motion detectors.

A home could have movement sensors on kitchen cupboard doors to detect when kids are swiping cookies, thinking mum or dad isn't looking – but instead an alert goes off on the parent's smartphone, and the child's tablet is locked as punishment. Why not just put a lock on the cupboard? Well, maybe little Luke or Lisa deserves a cookie from time to time, so the parent tells the phone it's allowable.

Maybe, you'd simply like to control your oven from your smartwatch. ARM's hoping lots of people will start to solve problems in areas where there's sufficient levels of demand to sell products and make money. Because that means ARM can make some money from it, too.

Slide showing a street light reporting back to a server

So how's this thing work ... street lights that know who's there (click to enlarge)

ARM says it's got a load of companies on board already in the new-look mbed project – from IBM doing the aforementioned Smart Cities to system-on-chip manufacturers taking the Cortex-M core blueprints and building peripherals around them in silicon. These manufacturers are expected to support the mbed OS, from the chips to the boards.

List of partners taking part in the mbed OS program

Who's on board ... IBM to Ericsson, Atmel to Marvell, etc (click to enlarge)

The mbed OS should be ready for ARM's partners to use by Q4 2014, we're told; don't expect any devices using the software until 2015. Mike Muller suggested it will take about three years before vendors start to see real take up of mbed-powered IoT things, if the platform takes off. The mbed Device Server is already in production, apparently.

The software is described as free, and partially open source, but ... there's always a but. The mbed OS is free to use, and a lot of it will eventually be open source, we're told. But there will be binary blobs in the firmware. Some of this will be closely guarded, closed-source drivers for the SoCs, developed by the chip manufacturers; some of it is for security; some of it is so that features remain closed source until they're finished.

For example, it should be possible to update the microcontroller firmware over the air, so you'll want those upgrades to be cryptographically signed so that attackers can't upload arbitrary malicious code to devices. That means including a public key in the flash.

Another part of it is what some may describe as control, but ARM describes it as consistency. You can tweak and improve the open-source parts of the mbed stack, but ARM would like particular components to remain consistent and fully compatible throughout the platform – particularly the security and radio hardware layers, and the code that brings up a device.

When an mbed OS SoC starts up, it may be possible for the device to fetch and install firmware that best suits its surroundings; to do this, the SoC has to initialize into a secure state running instructions it can trust; there's little to gain from securely update an already compromised device.

Again, this is where binary components come into play. ARM partners will get access to the source, however.

Security, we're told, is included from the ground up, rather than as an afterthought or premium feature. The kernel has been designed to run the on-chip software in a "cryptobox", a sort-of sandbox that attempts to stop code compromising the device. The Cortex-M family doesn't feature memory management units, nor TrustZone, so securing programs must be done in software.

Until the more curious-minded start jailbreaking $5 sensor SoCs to run completely arbitrary code, the binary part of the stack allows ARM to keep a firm hand on the tiller, to stop the project fragmenting and taking the team back to square one.

"Open source makes it easier to improve, and easier for people to find and fix bugs," ARM's Shelby added.

Meanwhile, the mbed Device Server side is free to use and develop on, but a license must be obtained to use it commercially. This is ARM, after all; licensing technology is its bread and butter. ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • Restructure at Arm focused on 'non-engineering' roles
    Meanwhile, CEO wants to vacuum up engineering talent amid return to stock market

    Updated Arm today told The Reg its restructuring ahead of its return to the stock market is focused on cutting "non-engineering" jobs.

    This is after we queried comments made this morning by Arm chief executive Rene Haas in the Financial Times, in which he indicated he was looking to use funds generated by the expected public listing to expand the company, hire more staff, and potentially pursue acquisitions. This comes as some staff face the chop.

    This afternoon we were told by an Arm spokesperson: "Rene was referring more to the fact that Arm continues to invest significantly in its engineering talent, which makes up around 75 percent of the global headcount. For example, we currently have more than 250 engineering roles available globally."

    Continue reading
  • Arm says its Cortex-X3 CPU smokes this Intel laptop silicon
    Chip design house reveals brains of what might be your next ultralight notebook

    Arm has at least one of Intel's more capable mainstream laptop processors in mind with its Cortex-X3 CPU design.

    The British outfit said the X3, revealed Tuesday alongside other CPU and GPU blueprints, is expected to provide an estimated 34 percent higher peak performance than a performance core in Intel's upper mid-range Core i7-1260P processor from this year.

    Arm came to that conclusion, mind you, after running the SPECRate2017_int_base single-threaded benchmark in a simulation of its CPU core design clocked at an equivalent to 3.6GHz with 1MB of L2 and 16MB of L3 cache.

    Continue reading
  • Intel is running rings around AMD and Arm at the edge
    What will it take to loosen the x86 giant's edge stranglehold?

    Analysis Supermicro launched a wave of edge appliances using Intel's newly refreshed Xeon-D processors last week. The launch itself was nothing to write home about, but a thought occurred: with all the hype surrounding the outer reaches of computing that we call the edge, you'd think there would be more competition from chipmakers in this arena.

    So where are all the AMD and Arm-based edge appliances?

    A glance through the catalogs of the major OEMs – Dell, HPE, Lenovo, Inspur, Supermicro – returned plenty of results for AMD servers, but few, if any, validated for edge deployments. In fact, Supermicro was the only one of the five vendors that even offered an AMD-based edge appliance – which used an ageing Epyc processor. Hardly a great showing from AMD. Meanwhile, just one appliance from Inspur used an Arm-based chip from Nvidia.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022