Google ordered to tear down search results from its global dotcom by French court

...but not in a "right to be forgotten" case

In one of the first rulings of its kind, a French court last month ordered Google to remove links to defamatory information from its search results globally.

Up to now, most rulings have limited themselves to the local top level domain – such as However, the decision of the High Court in Paris was that this would be insufficient because even in France users can search using the domain.

However despite some media reporting, this is not the same as asking the search giant to de-index your information under the so-called “right to be forgotten” ruling by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in May.

That ruling ordered Google to remove links to a 10-year-old Spanish newspaper notice about a mortgage foreclosure against Costeja González, a 58-year-old Spaniard, because he successfully argued that the information was “outdated and irrelevant”.

However the information was itself lawful and accurate. In the latest French case, the information that the links pointed to was found to be defamatory. If Google does not comply, it will face daily fines of €1,000 – which is chump change for the web goliath.

Since the right-to-be-forgotten ruling in May, Google has set up an online form that people can use if they want certain information de-linked from search results for their name. How Google decides on the merits of these requests is not clear, but it does, for the time being, seem to be erring on the side of complying with them.

But any right-to-be-forgotten de-linking is only for search results carried out on Google’s European domains, such as or

At a Brussels event in June, attendees expressed surprise and disbelief when Marisa Jimenez, Google's privacy policy counsel, said that the domain would not be affected by the right-to-be-forgotten ruling, because it was not targeted at the EU in general. In an attempt to work out how best to handle the thousands of requests to “be forgotten” it has received since the ECJ decision, Google’s Advisory Council is touring European capitals asking for advice from the public as well as experts.

The question of scope is almost certain to come up and this latest French ruling will add weight to certain arguments. The Advisory Council will be in Berlin on 14 October, London on 16 October and Brussels on 4 November. ®

Other stories you might like

  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading
  • Big Tech loves talking up privacy – while trying to kill privacy legislation
    Study claims Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft work to derail data rules

    Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft often support privacy in public statements, but behind the scenes they've been working through some common organizations to weaken or kill privacy legislation in US states.

    That's according to a report this week from news non-profit The Markup, which said the corporations hire lobbyists from the same few groups and law firms to defang or drown state privacy bills.

    The report examined 31 states when state legislatures were considering privacy legislation and identified 445 lobbyists and lobbying firms working on behalf of Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft, along with industry groups like TechNet and the State Privacy and Security Coalition.

    Continue reading
  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022