Can do better: Tech industry report on Australia's tech curriculum

Freelancer CEO Matt Barrie ropable, blames intractable teachers for resistance to new subject

Industry has reacted unkindly to Australia's decision to walk away from previous plans to teach digital technologies – including computation thinking – to all students from kindergarten until the fourth year of high school.

A review of Australia's national curriculum, released yesterday, recommended that the recently-created digital technologies curriculum be taught as part of other subjects instead of as a discrete course. Only in year nine, the third year of High School, will dedicated technology courses become available as electives.

Matt Barrie, CEO of crowdsourcing site, told The Reg “The people that run this country are fast turning it into a shipwreck.”

“I think the fundamental problem here is the education bureaucracy does not want change because our teachers themselves are not technically literate or willing and in most cases even capable of up skilling,” he wrote. Barrie also lamented the review's reliance on the opinions of the Australian Computer Society (ACS) , a body he has often argued is not in touch with the realities of the technology industries.

The ACS expressed some disappointment with the decision to move away from a discrete digital technologies curriculum, saying that while it “has welcomed the report into the ACARA curriculum review, and its consideration of the technologies & ICT learning area” it wishes to express “concern in the recommendation that the technologies learning area not be introduced until year 9.”

“This recommendation, should it be adopted, would place Australian students at a significant disadvantage against students from the UK, who will be learning technology and ICT from the Foundation level,” the Society's statement said.

“While there is a view that ICT contributes to a crowded curriculum, the ACS will continue to argue that ICT is a fundamental and critical curriculum area that should form the core of the curriculum, along with numeracy and literacy, as the economy and jobs market becomes increasingly digitally focused.”

“If we don’t step in today and start providing the right digital education from a young age, we are at risk of having a generation of school leavers who will miss out on the education they need to be the innovators, entrepreneurs and digital leaders of tomorrow,” the statement adds.

“Some of the recommendations are a small step in the right direction, but what our curriculum needs is a giant leap into the future.”

SallyAnn Williams, Senior Program Manager at Google Australia, did not criticise the decision but said "For Australians to move from consumers of technology, to creators of technology, we need to be bold in bringing more computational thinking into our classrooms. We have an ongoing commitment to working with both primary and secondary teachers to increase their understanding and confidence around teaching computer science subjects at primary and secondary level".

The Australian Information Industries Association (AIIA) is also cool on the decision. While the Association told us "We agree that implementation of the Digital Technologies Curriculum must be supported by appropriate teacher training and that this is imperative to achieving the outcomes required," it worries that "Stepping back from the current Digital Technologies Curriculum proposed by ACARA will effectively result in Australia being out of step with trends in ICT and computer science education in countries such as the USA, UK, NZ, the Netherlands and even Vietnam. This poses serious risks to Australia’s ongoing competitiveness in the global digital economy.

AIIA is concerned that Australia is not taking the development of deep ICT related skills and capabilities seriously enough. This includes addressing the need to embed ICT skills development in the school curriculum, including the formative primary years of school." ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • These Rapoo webcams won't blow your mind, but they also won't break the bank

    And they're almost certainly better than a laptop jowel-cam

    Review It has been a long 20 months since Lockdown 1.0, and despite the best efforts of Google and Zoom et al to filter out the worst effects of built-in laptop webcams, a replacement might be in order for the long haul ahead.

    With this in mind, El Reg's intrepid reviews desk looked at a pair of inexpensive Rapoo webcams in search for an alternative to the horror of our Dell XPS nose-cam.

    Rapoo sent us its higher-end XW2K, a 2K 30fps device and, at the other end of the scale, the 720p XW170. Neither will break the bank, coming in at around £40 and £25 respectively from online retailers, but do include some handy features, such as autofocus and a noise cancelling microphone.

    Continue reading
  • It's one thing to have the world in your hands – what are you going to do with it?

    Google won the patent battle against ART+COM, but we were left with little more than a toy

    Column I used to think technology could change the world. Google's vision is different: it just wants you to sort of play with the world. That's fun, but it's not as powerful as it could be.

    Despite the fact that it often gives me a stomach-churning sense of motion sickness, I've been spending quite a bit of time lately fully immersed in Google Earth VR. Pop down inside a major city centre – Sydney, San Francisco or London – and the intense data-gathering work performed by Google's global fleet of scanning vehicles shows up in eye-popping detail.

    Buildings are rendered photorealistically, using the mathematics of photogrammetry to extrude three-dimensional solids from multiple two-dimensional images. Trees resolve across successive passes from childlike lollipops into complex textured forms. Yet what should feel absolutely real seems exactly the opposite – leaving me cold, as though I've stumbled onto a global-scale miniature train set, built by someone with too much time on their hands. What good is it, really?

    Continue reading
  • Why Cloud First should not have to mean Cloud Everywhere

    HPE urges 'consciously hybrid' strategy for UK public sector

    Sponsored In 2013, the UK government heralded Cloud First, a ground-breaking strategy to drive cloud adoption across the public sector. Eight years on, and much of UK public sector IT still runs on-premises - and all too often - on obsolete technologies.

    Today the government‘s message boils down to “cloud first, if you can” - perhaps in recognition that modernising complex legacy systems is hard. But in the private sector today, enterprises are typically mixing and matching cloud and on-premises infrastructure, according to the best business fit for their needs.

    The UK government should also adopt a “consciously hybrid” approach, according to HPE, The global technology company is calling for the entire IT industry to step up so that the public sector can modernise where needed and keep up with innovation: “We’re calling for a collective IT industry response to the problem,” says Russell MacDonald, HPE strategic advisor to the public sector.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021