Feathers fly as Twitter squawks of record sales but slow user growth

Losses mount despite rising revenue


Twitter outperformed analysts' revenue estimates again this quarter, but investors, dismayed by another quarter of deep losses and slowing user growth, battered the company's stock anyway following its third-quarter 2014 earnings report.

The microblogging service posted a record $361.27m in revenue for the three months ending on September 30, which was a 114 per cent year-on-year increase. Its earnings met expectations at $0.01 per diluted share.

Advertising brought in most of the haul, at 87 per cent of the total. Of that lump, 85 per cent was from mobile advertising. All in all, advertising revenue was up 109 per cent from the year-ago period, which was solid but not as good as the 129 per cent ad-revenue hike of the previous sequential quarter.

Encouragingly, Twitter's data licensing and other businesses also showed impressive year-on-year growth. Although these sidelines only brought in $41.07m, that was more than triple what they did in last year's period.

Yet Twitter's net losses also widened in the quarter, by a gruesome 172 per cent versus a year ago. The $175.46m shortfall made for the company's worst quarterly loss since it ate a massive $521m charge for stock-based compensation expenses in Q4 of 2013, following its initial public offering.

More troubling for shareholders, however, was that Twitter still just isn't gaining and retaining users as quickly as it needs to. In fact, its growth actually appears to be slowing, triggering fears that it may soon plateau.

The service saw 284 million global monthly active users (MAUs) during the quarter, which CEO Dick Costolo described in a conference call with financial analysts as "the fuel that powers the entire system." Around 227 million of these were on mobile devices.

While total MAUs were up 22 per cent from the same period a year ago, however, they were only up 5 per cent from the previous sequential quarter. And in that quarter they were up 24 per cent, year-on-year. This is actually the second sequential quarter in which growth of MAUs shrank, which doesn't indicate a company with the momentum of firms like Facebook.

The same trend held true for Timeline views, a metric that Twitter uses to measure how engaged its users are with its service. Total Timeline views cracked 180 million in the quarter, which was up 14 per cent from the previous year's quarter. But in Q2 the figure was up 15 per cent, year-on-year, and Timeline views are only growing by about 4 per cent each sequential quarter.

Maybe that shouldn't matter. Ad revenue per 1,000 Timeline views was up 82 per cent in Q3, to $1.77. And while Timeline views still earned the most in the US, international revenue per 1,000 views is growing faster, up 133 per cent from the year-ago quarter.

Still, none of it was enough to appease Twitter's fickle shareholders, who were hoping to see much more tangible performance by now – or dare we say, something approaching a profit. Investors hit the company's stock hard following the news, sending its shares down nearly 3 per cent during the day and another 11 per cent after Monday's closing bell. ®

Broader topics


Other stories you might like

  • DMCA can't be used to sidestep First Amendment, court rules
    Anonymous speech protections apply online too, and copyright can't diminish that

    It's been a good week for free speech advocates as a judge ruled that copyright law cannot be used to circumvent First Amendment anonymity protections.

    The decision from the US District Court for the Northern District of California overturns a previous ruling that compelled Twitter to unmask an anonymous user accused of violating the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). 

    The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), which filed a joint amicus brief with the ACLU in support of Twitter's position, said the ruling confirms "that copyright holders issuing subpoenas under the DMCA must still meet the Constitution's test before identifying anonymous speakers." 

    Continue reading
  • Meta agrees to tweak ad system after US govt brands it discriminatory
    And pay the tiniest of fines, too

    Facebook parent Meta has settled a complaint brought by the US government, which alleged the internet giant's machine-learning algorithms broke the law by blocking certain users from seeing online real-estate adverts based on their nationality, race, religion, sex, and marital status.

    Specifically, Meta violated America's Fair Housing Act, which protects people looking to buy or rent properties from discrimination, it was claimed; it is illegal for homeowners to refuse to sell or rent their houses or advertise homes to specific demographics, and to evict tenants based on their demographics.

    This week, prosecutors sued Meta in New York City, alleging the mega-corp's algorithms discriminated against users on Facebook by unfairly targeting people with housing ads based on their "race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status, and national origin."

    Continue reading
  • SpaceX staff condemn Musk's behavior in open letter
    Well, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see why

    A group of employees at SpaceX wrote an open letter to COO and president Gwynne Shotwell denouncing owner Elon Musk's public behavior and calling for the rocket company to "swiftly and explicitly separate itself" from his personal brand.

    The letter, which was acquired through anonymous SpaceX sources, calls Musk's recent behavior in the public sphere a source of distraction and embarrassment. Musk's tweets, the writers argue, are de facto company statements because "Elon is seen as the face of SpaceX."

    Musk's freewheeling tweets have landed him in hot water on multiple occasions – one incident even leaving him unable to tweet about Tesla without a lawyer's review and approval. 

    Continue reading
  • Musk repeats threat to end $46.5bn Twitter deal – with lawyers, not just tweets
    Right as Texas AG sticks his oar in

    Elon Musk is prepared to terminate his takeover of Twitter, reiterating his claim that the social media biz is covering up the number of spam and fake bot accounts on the site, lawyers representing the Tesla CEO said on Monday.

    Musk offered to acquire Twitter for $54.20 per share in an all-cash deal worth over $44 billion in April. Twitter's board members resisted his attempt to take the company private but eventually accepted the deal. Musk then sold $8.4 billion worth of his Tesla shares, secured another $7.14 billion from investors to try and collect the $21 billion he promised to front himself. Tesla's stock price has been falling since this saga began while Twitter shares gained and then tailed downward.

    Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others promised to loan the remaining $25.5 billion from via debt financing. The takeover appeared imminent as rumors swirled over how Musk wanted to make Twitter profitable and take it public again in a future IPO. But the tech billionaire got cold feet and started backing away from the deal last month, claiming it couldn't go forward unless Twitter proved fake accounts make up less than five per cent of all users – a stat Twitter claimed and Musk believes is higher.

    Continue reading
  • GPUs aren’t always your best bet, Twitter ML tests suggest
    Graphcore processor outperforms Nvidia rival in team's experiments

    GPUs are a powerful tool for machine-learning workloads, though they’re not necessarily the right tool for every AI job, according to Michael Bronstein, Twitter’s head of graph learning research.

    His team recently showed Graphcore’s AI hardware offered an “order of magnitude speedup when comparing a single IPU processor to an Nvidia A100 GPU,” in temporal graph network (TGN) models.

    “The choice of hardware for implementing Graph ML models is a crucial, yet often overlooked problem,” reads a joint article penned by Bronstein with Emanuele Rossi, an ML researcher at Twitter, and Daniel Justus, a researcher at Graphcore.

    Continue reading
  • Cookie consent crumbles under fresh UK data law proposals
    Campaigners fear erosion of rights as narrowing of law proposed as well as political control over independent watchdog

    The UK government has published its plans for reforming local data protection law which includes removing the requirement for consent for all website cookies – akin to the situation across much of the US.

    Also notable is the removal of the requirement for a Data Protection Impact Assessment, as well as a new political direction over the Information Commissioner's Office.

    However, Nadine Dorries, the minister for the Department of Digital, Media, Culture and Sport, rejected controversial proposals to remove the right to challenge automated decision-making. Privacy campaigners had said the proposals were "irresponsible" and would make it harder for people to "challenge the government or corporations."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022