We're doing great, say dot-London chiefs ... Unfortunately, few agree

Dot-rodeo, dot-vodka, dot-fishing, dot-horse not flying off the shelves, funnily enough


Operator of the dot-London internet registry, Minds & Machines, has told investors that it is "highly satisfied" with registrations in the new domain name extensions it operates – "particularly from a revenue perspective."

Unfortunately, the stock market and domain name industry don't seem to agree. Announcing that it would launch four more top-level domains in the New Year to add to its 10 extensions, the company's stock fell six per cent, later recovering to 2.5 per cent down. At 9.75 pence per share, it is some way from its 20p high mark last year.

Apart from the two city top-level domains that it operates – dot-London and dot-Bayern – Minds & Machines has had a lackluster year alongside other new extensions.

In its statement to investors, the company said it was "greatly encouraged by the uptake of names in dot-beer, where enthusiastic adoption by the North American craft brewers demonstrates how niche marketing to a specific sector can monetise a domain in a highly cost-efficient manner." However, the dot-beer registry has little more than 4,000 domains.

Others including dot-rodeo, dot-vodka, dot-fishing and dot-horse are hovering at or below the 1,000 registrations mark, well below the market average of 10,000 domains.

Pushing what it calls ".com equivalent years", or CEYs, as a way of recognizing changes in the domain name market such as higher prices and longer renewal periods, the company argues it has the equivalent of just under 500,000 dot-com domains, even though its actual total registrations are around 90,000 domains.

Recent decisions and auctions have also seen the company lose what could have been popular new extensions (dot-eco, dot-hotel), and many of the other extensions it has already spent $185,000 apiece applying for are also wanted by companies with much deeper pockets including Google, Amazon and gTLD giant Donuts (app, book, cloud, inc and store, for example).

Even with the most successful launch so far – dot-London with nearly 50,000 registrations – there are questions over the company's go-to-market strategy.

It has reserved an extraordinary 66,000 domains that it hopes to sell at "premium" prices. It has also gone against the market norm by setting a high annual renewal rate, rather than a one-off premium acquisition price followed by baseline renewal costs. This, registrars complain, is reducing demand for premium names. There have also been delays in the auction process for valuable names, impacting brand awareness.

Registrars and domainers have been increasingly vocal about high prices and the tight control that the company is trying to keep over its registries. A dot-London domain costs three times a dot-com. At the same time, the company is undercutting registrars by selling them for less than the market price it sets through its own website. It is also marketing its own sales website heavily on Facebook and in Google ads, leaving the domain selling industry in the cold.

Minds & Machines clearly sees selling direct to customers as an advantage, congratulating itself in its own announcement for being a "forward-thinking registrar" by "marketing directly to the niche verticals represented by many top-level domains" and complaining that it looks forward to "a more predictable and robust distribution channel."

Effectively, the company is banking on far greater consumer awareness of new internet domains and is willing to upset traditional channels in pursuit of that goal. It's a risky strategy that at the moment at least is not paying off. ®

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Red Hat effort to shut down WeMakeFedora.org deemed harassment
    IBM's Linux distro giant unable to wrestle domain name from owner

    IBM's Red Hat cannot prevent Daniel Pocock and his Software Freedom Institute SA from using the domain name WeMakeFedora.org, according to a ruling on Monday.

    Red Hat, which sponsors the development of the Fedora Linux distribution, challenged the inclusion of the trademarked term "Fedora" in the website URL, and demanded it be given the .org domain name. But under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) established by DNS oversight body ICANN, a FORUM mediator found Red Hat's objections wanting, and refused to order a transfer of the domain.

    "There are no advertisements on the respondent's website," the decision states. "There is no evidence that respondent is a competitor of complainant, nor is there any evidence that respondent has operated the website for any commercial purpose. The panel rejects complainant's submission, unsupported by evidence, that respondent's conduct is likely to have been undertaken for commercial gain."

    Continue reading
  • Nominet suspends 'single digit' number of Russian dot-UK domain registrars
    Does not wish to 'profit' from 'commercial arrangements' in Russia

    Nominet, the dot-UK domain registry, has announced that it will suspend services for Russian web domain registrars – and the British government says it "welcomes" the action.

    Suspension will prevent the registrars from managing or renewing dot-UK domains they own or control.

    "We are not accepting registrations from registrars in Russia – we are suspending the relevant tags. To avoid compromising outlets for expression outside the control of the regime, the very small number of domains with Russian address details will continue to operate as normal," said the organisation in a statement on its website.

    Continue reading
  • Ukraine asks ICANN to delete all Russian domains
    Plus: Namecheap tells customers in Russia they are no longer welcome, citing 'war crimes'

    Updated In response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine last week, Mykhailo Fedorov, First Vice Prime Minister of Ukraine, on Monday asked the head of DNS overlord ICANN to disable country code top-level domains associated with Russia.

    In an email [PDF], Fedorov asked Göran Marby, CEO of ICANN, to impose sanctions on Russia, arguing that the Putin regime has used internet infrastructure to propagandize its war effort.

    Specifically, he has asked for the revocation of domains “.ru”, “.рф”, “.su”, and others used by the Russian Federation, shutting down DNS root servers serving the Russian Federation, and contributing to the revocation of associated TLS/SSL certificates for those domains.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022