Oracle gives HR tool to track your fitness

This gives a whole new - and scary - meaning to 'performance review'


Oracle has announced a new tool for HR departments called “Employee Wellness” and seems to be suggesting that you might be willing to let your boss track how much you exercise.

The tool's a new module for the company's “Human Capital Management” software and promises the chance to let you track your physical activity, set goals, and tell you when you improve or hit milestones.

Nothing to worry about there: myriad gadgets and services will do that for you.

But things get interesting when you consider that Oracle says “The application provides recommendations to employees on behaviors that can increase their well-being as well as links between their well-being and their work life.”

In other words, HR can tell you to lay off the pies and three-beer lunches.

Things get more interesting still because Oracle suggests “Benefits professionals can create games and competitions to foster adoption and increase participation in wellness programs, enabling employees, benefits providers, and the deploying company to jointly participant and take responsibility for employee well-being.”

If the "benefits" under consideration are employer-provided gym memberships and the intention is to help benefits professionals to assess if they're a good investment, fair enough. And there are worse ways to generate esprit de corps than internal competitions.

If the benefits are health insurance, and the application can collect data an organisation could use to drive down health insurance premiums - and perhaps mean lazy lardies find themselves rated insufficiently committed to wellness during performance reviews - then this is very scary stuff indeed.

Oracle Wellness tool

Work is just a game for Oracle. A game in which HR tracks your every move.

Oracle says it's currently doing usability testing for the application. Let's hope they choose a workplace with a well-organised workforce for those tests: this one has a high “what could possibly go wrong with that” quotient that may well justify a bit of push-back. ®

Similar topics

Broader topics


Other stories you might like

  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading
  • Big Tech loves talking up privacy – while trying to kill privacy legislation
    Study claims Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft work to derail data rules

    Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft often support privacy in public statements, but behind the scenes they've been working through some common organizations to weaken or kill privacy legislation in US states.

    That's according to a report this week from news non-profit The Markup, which said the corporations hire lobbyists from the same few groups and law firms to defang or drown state privacy bills.

    The report examined 31 states when state legislatures were considering privacy legislation and identified 445 lobbyists and lobbying firms working on behalf of Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft, along with industry groups like TechNet and the State Privacy and Security Coalition.

    Continue reading
  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022