Uber exec wanted to sic private dicks on critics ... Hey, Emil Michael, COME AT US, bro

Exec sorry after dreaming of exposing journos' private lives

18 Reg comments Got Tips?

Car hire upstart Uber has apologized after a top exec suggested hiring investigators to expose the personal lives of its critics.

Senior veep of business Emil Michael said at a private dinner in New York City that Uber could blow "a million dollars" assembling a crack team of gumshoes and journalists to find dirt on the startup's numerous detractors in the press.

The private dicks would then spread whispers and stories to smear the company's enemies, Michael told the room, according to a BuzzFeed editor who was present.

One reporter, Pando.com's Sarah Lacy, in particular was singled out by Michael. This is disappointing on many levels – the pettiness, for one thing, but also because The Register is far more rude about Uber than Pando:

And so on and so forth.

San Francisco-headquartered Uber has today thrown itself into reverse gear: it issued an apology from Michael, who said the comments "do not reflect my actual views and have no relation to the company’s views or approach." Uber also noted that the dinner date was "off the record."

To clarify, "off the record" means "don't quote me on that" not "don't write that down." And in any case, BuzzFeed said it was not aware of the off-the-record nature of the nosh night, and did not agree to such conditions at the door.

Dealing with pushy or intimidating PRs and execs comes with the territory of being a journalist; if you're not causing trouble, you're not doing it right.

PR agencies keep files on hacks – who's been naughty and who's been nice, etc – but threatening to probe into reporters' private lives is another level. It's ethically bankrupt, and legally dicey depending on the methods used to obtain the sensitive information.

HP tried such tactics in the mid-2000s, by obtaining reporters' phone records, and the result was a scandal of epic proportions.

What's most damning for Uber in all of this, is that Michael's comments came as absolutely no surprise to us. ®


Keep Reading

University of California San Francisco pays ransomware gang $1.14m as BBC publishes 'dark web negotiations'

Publicity-hungry crims find new way of pressuring victims

Oracle leaves its heart in San Francisco – or it would do if, you know, Oracle had a heart

OpenWorld moving to Vegas, baby: SF now too expensive not to mention the filthy streets, open drug use...

Internet use up 40 per cent in San Francisco Bay Area – but you know what’s even higher? Yep, alcohol, weed use

Techies, non-techies respond to COVID-19 by self-medicating at home

Lyft pulls its e-bike fleet from San Francisco Bay Area after exploding batteries make them the hottest seat in town

Super Cali 'leccy bikes are proving quite atrocious, even though the biz insists they really quite precocious

San Francisco trial of Russian bloke extradited and accused of hacking LinkedIn, Dropbox, Formspring stalls again amid pandemic lockdown

Case that has rumbled on since 2016 may have to be started again from scratch

San Francisco votes no to facial-recognition tech for cops, govt – while its denizens create it

Alternative headline: Face-rec tech rekt – wham ban, thank you, San Fran

Lyft dumps 17% of staff, furloughs 5%, cuts pay as people stay home, avoid rides in possibly virus-ridden cars

Uber is reportedly thinking about laying off 5,000-plus, too

Tech hub blames tech: San Francisco fingers Uber, Lyft rides for its growing traffic headache

Nothing to do with lousy infrastructure, poor public transport, etc etc etc

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2020