'How a censorious and moralistic blogger ruined my evening'

Damn tech press. Reporting and stuff. Jesus

So you’re at an Uber-hosted dinner for New York media high-rollers, and the Uber exec - Emil Michael, senior VP for business - you’re talking to goes off on one, suggesting he could hire a million dollar team to dig up dirt on hostile journalists and their families. What do you do? This - apparently - depends on who you are.

It happened to Buzzfeed editor-in-chief Ben Smith a week ago, and he let the sucker have it with both barrels. Which is what we at The Register would do, although I’m not sure we’d ever get invited to such a gig even by accident. And I’m pretty sure Ben Smith will be fixing his own dinners a lot more in the future.

Michael Wolff on the other hand would likely have gone with something more sensitive and caring. Wolff is something of a lizard in the lounges of New York media high-rollers. He is the man who invited Smith to the dinner, and by his own admission has been to hundreds of these "media meet-and-greets" over the years. As likely have most of the other media leaders he names as being present - these are "Mort Zuckerman, owner of New York's Daily News; Clear Channel CEO Bob Pittman; Huffington Post chief Arianna Huffington, New Republic owner Chris Hughes; and an executive at Ronald Perelman's company, Chris Taylor".

Wolff has many appreciative readers

This particular meet and greet, Wolff tells us, was part of a series of background meetings Uber organised with journalists and "influentials". "Everybody" (apparently) knows these are off the record and in Wolff’s eyes, Smith not knowing is the core of the problem. But there’s a bigger problem, as we’ll see.

We take it there won’t be any more of these briefings for a while, and that this was one aimed at influentials, but into which Wolff accidentally inserted a real journalist. As far as we know, nothing of interest has emerged from any backgrounders for journalists that took place before it. Are the journalists OK with a nice meal and access in exchange for a tacit off the record agreement? We hope not.

You can read the whole of Wolff’s screed for yourself (not forgetting the excellent comments), but if we cut to the chase it goes something like this: jumped up attack-dog blogger was so gauche he didn’t know the rules (i.e. these gigs are strictly off the record) and blew what was quite possible a "half-bottle of wine rant" out of all proportion. And, darn it, when "I contacted Smith and told him it seemed unfair that Uber suffers for my lapse" he ignored me and went ahead and published anyway. Wolff is also miffed that Smith didn’t "deal with the issue on the spot" and thinks it curious that "Smith made no mention of his conversation with Michael to me after the dinner."

There’s really so much wrong with that, and I really do not think that last paragraph in any way exaggerates Wolff’s not-exactly-an-apologia. Here is what a British reporter would have done, and if it takes a jumped-up blogger to do it in New York, well, shame on the rest of them.

Smith may or may not have known that such meetings are off the record, but the rules are if nobody tells you beforehand and some dolt spills his guts, you’ve got them, it’s on the record. Furthermore, if you’re the only actual person within earshot prepared to commit an act of journalism, it’s an exclusive. So you’re going to pad up to CEO Travis Kalanick afterwards and tell him one of his execs is shooting his mouth off, is out of line, maybe you’d better deal with it? Or you’re going to ask him about it in an open Q&A in front of the whole room? Right… That seems to be what Michael Wolff would have done. Goodbye story, goodbye exclusive, hello media facilitator. Any sensible journalist that gets that kind of gold keeps their mouth shut till they’re well clear, not least because exiting might otherwise be challenging. Making sure there’s a phone line between you and whoever’s shouting at you is common prudence.

Wolff would also have taken a worried call from Uber saying Smith was asking questions and hadn’t he told him it was off the record, and would then have called Smith asking him to kill the story. Because that’s what he did do. That was really very kind of him, considering he tells us he doesn’t know the Uber people apart from that one dinner. Kindness to strangers is one of his redeeming features.

Fleet Street's finest are unimpressed

In defence of Uber and its consultant Ian Osborne, the former David Cameron adviser who hosted the dinner, Smith seems to have been the only actual reporter there. The rest of them were high-level execs who would no doubt assume that the dinner was off the record. As would Wolff, whose recent career has been built on rubbing shoulders with these people, and who has negligible detectable reporting experience in his resume.

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • EU-US Trade and Technology Council meets to coordinate on supply chains
    Agenda includes warning system for disruptions, and avoiding 'subsidy race' for chip investments

    The EU-US Trade and Technology Council (TTC) is meeting in Paris today to discuss coordinated approaches to global supply chain issues.

    This is only the second meeting of the TTC, the agenda for which was prepared in February. That highlighted a number of priorities, including securing supply chains, technological cooperation, the coordination of measures to combat distorting practices, and approaches to the decarbonization of trade.

    According to a White House pre-briefing for US reporters, the EU and US are set to announce joint approaches on technical discussions to international standard-setting bodies, an early warning system to better predict and address potential semiconductor supply chain disruptions, and a transatlantic approach to semiconductor investments aimed at ensuring security of supply.

    Continue reading
  • US cops kick back against facial recognition bans
    Plus: DeepMind launches new generalist AI system, and Apple boffin quits over return-to-work policy

    In brief Facial recognition bans passed by US cities are being overturned as law enforcement and lobbyist groups pressure local governments to tackle rising crime rates.

    In July, the state of Virginia will scrap its ban on the controversial technology after less than a year. California and New Orleans may follow suit, Reuters first reported. Vermont adjusted its bill to allow police to use facial recognition software in child sex abuse investigations.

    Elsewhere, efforts are under way in New York, Colorado, and Indiana to prevent bills banning facial recognition from passing. It's not clear if some existing vetoes set to expire, like the one in California, will be renewed. Around two dozen US state or local governments passed laws prohibiting facial recognition from 2019 to 2021. Police, however, believe the tool is useful in identifying suspects and can help solve cases especially in places where crime rates have risen.

    Continue reading
  • RISC-V needs more than an open architecture to compete
    Arm shows us that even total domination doesn't always make stupid levels of money

    Opinion Interviews with chip company CEOs are invariably enlightening. On top of the usual market-related subjects of success and failure, revenues and competition, plans and pitfalls, the highly paid victim knows that there's a large audience of unusually competent critics eager for technical details. That's you.

    Take The Register's latest interview with RISC-V International CEO Calista Redmond. It moved smartly through the gears on Intel's recent Platinum Membership of the open ISA consortium ("they're not too worried about their x86 business"), the interest from autocratic regimes (roughly "there are no rules, if some come up we'll stick by them"), and what RISC-V's 2022 will look like. Laptops. Thousand-core AI chips. Google hyperscalers. Edge. The plan seems to be to do in five years what took Arm 20.

    RISC-V may not be an existential risk to Intel, but Arm had better watch it.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022