Docker part 4: Microsoft CAN'T ignore it. Aux armes, citoyens!

Prognostication, Redmond and the Red Wedding


It's clear that Docker is here to stay, but we must temper our enthusiasm with pragmatism and a careful analysis of history. There are many pieces on the chessboard to consider, and each of them has a mind of its own.

Docker is simultaneously a big fish (thanks to the hype around it) and a relative minnow compared to the tech titans it proposes to disrupt. Understanding its likely evolution requires understanding the people involved and circumstances under which they labour.

At VMworld 2014 the hype surrounding Docker was tangible. Since VMware held a VMworld and basically forgot to show up, tens of thousands of people were left looking for something to talk about over beers. Everyone oohed and aahed about Data Gravity for about five minutes, then talked non-stop about Docker for days.

Love me!

Understanding the Docker hype means understanding something about Silicon Valley. The storage infrastructure wars are functionally over: server SANs won. Growth in arrays will halt, reverse, and traditional centralised storage will begin its long slide into zombie tech status alongside mainframes.

Along with this goes a huge pile of cheap-to-the-point-of-free cash to be had making startups based on what amounts to "a feature of a good storage product". Vendors are completing their Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) for this cycle. It'll be years before they've finished extracting the profit from their new acquisitions, and thus years before they go on another inflated buying spree. Big companies tend to want to get value of the millions and billions they spend.

Software as a Service is running into a few walls too. Developers have proven to suck at coding for scale. The public cloud computing isn't as cheap as the marketing droids said it would be. Worst of all, those pesky foreigners care about issues like "data sovereignty", so the precept of unlimited expansion that ensures continual investor funding is being challenged.

Silicon Valley desperately needs something to believe in.

This need for something to believe in goes a long way towards explaining why Docker is a much bigger affair inside than valley than outside it. Entrepreneurs need to know what the next big thing is so that they can string together the right marketing buzzwords and attract venture capital. Venture capitalist need hope in something – anything, really – that promises to prevent the bubble from collapsing, and thus gives them a direction to roll the dice in.

Docker has filled the void in the valley.

Docker is getting a lot of hype within Silicon Valley because Docker is really useful to the sorts of (web based) projects that the Valley does rather a lot of. It is new and shiny but still comfortable and familiar. It drives up utilization of a given server meaning that those increasingly bored – or unemployed – storage nerds now have a new puzzle to solve.

Until very recently, this was the narrative. Docker was getting mad hype within the Silicon Valley because Docker was getting mad hype within Silicon Valley. It is today's Paris Hilton of tech: famous for being famous, but only within certain circles. Outside the echo chamber, everyone else just sort of wondered what the fuss is about. And then Microsoft intervened


Other stories you might like

  • Nutanix reshuffles product portfolio into bigger bundles
    Plan calls for this to end in tiers

    Nutanix has rearranged its portfolio by placing different tools into newly named bundles and buckets, and creating different tiers for the new products.

    If you're a Nutanix customer and don't want to change the way you interact with the company, or pay for its wares, feel free to stop reading now because current arrangements will persist if you want to carry on as you do today.

    For the rest of you, Nutanix now offers five different bundles of products:

    Continue reading
  • VMware fixes vSphere release it pulled, sorts out Log4j while it's at it
    Driver drama is done, new dev practices should prevent repeats, says Virtzilla

    VMware has restored availability of vSphere 7 Update, a release that it withdrew in late 2021 after driver dramas derailed deployments.

    Paul Turner, Virtzilla's veep for vSphere product management, told The Register that the source of the problem was Intel driver updates that arrived out of sync with VMware's pre-release testing program. When users adopted the new drivers – one of which had been renamed – vSphere produced errors that meant virtual server fleet managers could not sustain high availability operations.

    Turner said around 30,000 customers had adopted the release, of which around eight per cent encountered the issue. That collection of around 2,400 impacted users was enough for VMware to pull the release before the other 270,000 vSphere users hit trouble. That level of potential problems, Turner admitted, was considered a sufficient threshold to justify a do-over and the embarrassment of a pulled release.

    Continue reading
  • Parallels: Purveyors of decent virtualization software... and occasionally iffy checksums
    La la la, we're not listening

    For some, an MD5 checksum is the sequence of letters and numbers that shows up next to the file they want to download. For others, it's a handy pointer that the file you've downloaded is the one you were expecting.

    A Register reader got in touch after noticing something a bit odd on the Parallels downloads page. The company helpfully provides the MD5 checksum for its Desktop for Mac images, but what got downloaded apparently had an entirely different value. We checked and confirmed that the DMG file linked did not have the same checksum.

    This would ordinarily set off alarm bells. After all, there have been a good few examples over the years of poisoned files being sneakily deposited on servers by miscreants seeking their next victim. Could Parallels, purveyors of virtualization tech, have been similarly targeted?

    Continue reading
  • Docker Desktop no longer free for large companies: New 'Business' subscription is here
    Search for sustainable business model continues, but most usage will still be free

    Docker will restrict use of the free version of its Docker Desktop utility to individuals or small businesses, and has introduced a new more expensive subscription, as it searches for a sustainable business model.

    The company has renamed its Free plan to "Personal" and now requires that businesses with 250 or more employees, or higher than $10m in annual revenue, must use a paid subscription if they require Docker Desktop. There are no changes to the command-line Docker Engine. The $5/month Pro and $7/month Teams subscriptions continue as before, but a new $21/month Business subscription adds features including centralized management, single sign-on, and enhanced security.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022