NFC chips lie unused

+Comment Oh, what a surprise. NFC has failed to ignite the imagination of iPhone users, with 90 per cent of them shunning the payment method of the future.

This is among the findings of stats-loving website InfoScout, which reports that of the approximately 20 million or so iPhone 6s which have been sold, 18 million have never been used with ApplePay.

Infoscout reports that those remaining two million users who have lost their bonking virginity think of it as quick, easy, convenient and safe but only use it as a transaction method half of the time. When they choose not to pay for goods and services with ApplePay, it is mainly because they didn’t know that bonking was on offer or they simply forgot, they told the survey-slingers.

Within the majority who have never tried it, many say ApplePay is a mystery to them and they either didn’t know how it worked or hadn’t even heard of it. Nearly a third were quite happy with the way they paid.

This compares quite well with the experience of Transport for London (TfL), which found that in the first million contactless card – as opposed to Oyster – transactions, 0.01 per cent used phones. Those 10,000 transactions might sound like a lot, but that's the total over two weeks when TfL does many millions of transactions a day and could represent as few as a thousand individuals out of the millions on the buses and tube.

It’s not a technical issue: only five per cent of the 50 per cent of the 10 per cent group of people who "sometimes" used NFC on iPhones (that’s 50,000 – or 0.25 per cent of the 20 million users surveyed) didn’t use Apple Pay when they could on Black Friday, because they had tried registering with ApplePay and couldn’t get it to work. That’s still more people than would fill the Chelsea stadium. ®


Three years ago Franco Bernabè – former CEO of Telecom Italia Group and ex-chairman of the GSMA – predicted that NFC would be using the Single Wire Protocol and we’d see $50bn of transactions (a year) in three years' time.

When he said, that I pointed out that it was a rash statement. Apple’s move means Single Wire Protocol is dead and the lack of acceptance of even ApplePay means that contactless in phones is as much an “experiment” as it was a decade ago. Weve, for example, has seen a lot of failures. My prediction is that in March we’ll see new high-end phones at Mobile World Congress which do not have NFC, the start of the slide which will condemn the technology to the same fate as Push To Talk and Universal Mobile Access, which were also passing enthusiasms for the mobile networks. ®

Other stories you might like

  • Venezuelan cardiologist charged with designing and selling ransomware
    If his surgery was as bad as his opsec, this chap has caused a lot of trouble

    The US Attorney’s Office has charged a 55-year-old cardiologist with creating and selling ransomware and profiting from revenue-share agreements with criminals who deployed his product.

    A complaint [PDF] filed on May 16th in the US District Court, Eastern District of New York, alleges that Moises Luis Zagala Gonzalez – aka “Nosophoros,” “Aesculapius” and “Nebuchadnezzar” – created a ransomware builder known as “Thanos”, and ransomware named “Jigsaw v. 2”.

    The self-taught coder and qualified cardiologist advertised the ransomware in dark corners of the web, then licensed it ransomware to crooks for either $500 or $800 a month. He also ran an affiliate network that offered the chance to run Thanos to build custom ransomware, in return for a share of profits.

    Continue reading
  • China reveals its top five sources of online fraud
    'Brushing' tops the list, as quantity of forbidden content continue to rise

    China’s Ministry of Public Security has revealed the five most prevalent types of fraud perpetrated online or by phone.

    The e-commerce scam known as “brushing” topped the list and accounted for around a third of all internet fraud activity in China. Brushing sees victims lured into making payment for goods that may not be delivered, or are only delivered after buyers are asked to perform several other online tasks that may include downloading dodgy apps and/or establishing e-commerce profiles. Victims can find themselves being asked to pay more than the original price for goods, or denied promised rebates.

    Brushing has also seen e-commerce providers send victims small items they never ordered, using profiles victims did not create or control. Dodgy vendors use that tactic to then write themselves glowing product reviews that increase their visibility on marketplace platforms.

    Continue reading
  • Oracle really does owe HPE $3b after Supreme Court snub
    Appeal petition as doomed as the Itanic chips at the heart of decade-long drama

    The US Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear Oracle's appeal to overturn a ruling ordering the IT giant to pay $3 billion in damages for violating a decades-old contract agreement.

    In June 2011, back when HPE had not yet split from HP, the biz sued Oracle for refusing to add Itanium support to its database software. HP alleged Big Red had violated a contract agreement by not doing so, though Oracle claimed it explicitly refused requests to support Intel's Itanium processors at the time.

    A lengthy legal battle ensued. Oracle was ordered to cough up $3 billion in damages in a jury trial, and appealed the decision all the way to the highest judges in America. Now, the Supreme Court has declined its petition.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022