Firms will have to report OWN diverted profits under 'Google Tax' law

It's reporting yourself to cops, then having to defend yourself, quips beancounter

Under the so-called "Google tax" regime due to come in next year, multi-nationals will have to "self-report" any diverted profits to HMRC and then defend their own activities, according to draft legislation on the Diverted Profits Tax published today.

Last week chancellor George Osborne pledged to slap a 25 per cent tax on company whose profits were made in UK but diverted abroad, as large multinational technology companies are perceived to be the most aggressive UK tax avoiders.

The legislation, currently in its draft form (PDF), will be introduced in Finance Bill 2015.

However, Chas Roy-Chowdhury, head of taxation at the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, said there is still little administrative detail provided to help companies prepare for the new rules, which will be introduced in just four months.

A spokesman from HMRC said officials are working hard on getting out the Tax Information and Impact Notes (TIIN) for the new draft law "ASAP".

Under the section "duty to notify if potentially within scope of tax" (page 126 of the explanatory notes to the 552-page draft bill), companies will have to report where they devise a tax scheme that involves economic activity that would otherwise be attributable to tax derived from the UK.

Roy-Chowdhury said: "It's a bit like reporting yourself to the police and then having to defend yourself."

He added: "It seems strange that multinationals would have to report themselves and the the onus is on them to defend their [tax activities.]"

The Treasury estimates the Google tax will raise £25m in 2015-16, rising incrementally to £355m by 2019-20.

HMRC said it will need to makes changes to IT systems to deliver this change, at an estimated one-off cost of £300,000. Additional staff costs are estimated to be in the region of £2.3m for 2015-16 to 2017-18 and then £1m thereafter.

A Treasury briefing recently quoted the "double Irish" tax structure – where companies route UK profits to Ireland. "It is clear which European member states are being targeted," said Roy-Chowdhury.

Many large technology companies are based in Ireland due to the country's low corporation tax of 12.5 per cent. Corporation tax in the UK is 20 per cent. ®

Similar topics

Narrower topics

Other stories you might like

  • DigitalOcean tries to take sting out of price hike with $4 VM
    Cloud biz says it is reacting to customer mix largely shifting from lone devs to SMEs

    DigitalOcean attempted to lessen the sting of higher prices this week by announcing a cut-rate instance aimed at developers and hobbyists.

    The $4-a-month droplet — what the infrastructure-as-a-service outfit calls its virtual machines — pairs a single virtual CPU with 512 MB of memory, 10 GB of SSD storage, and 500 GB a month in network bandwidth.

    The launch comes as DigitalOcean plans a sweeping price hike across much of its product portfolio, effective July 1. On the low-end, most instances will see pricing increase between $1 and $16 a month, but on the high-end, some products will see increases of as much as $120 in the case of DigitalOceans’ top-tier storage-optimized virtual machines.

    Continue reading
  • GPL legal battle: Vizio told by judge it will have to answer breach-of-contract claims
    Fine-print crucially deemed contractual agreement as well as copyright license in smartTV source-code case

    The Software Freedom Conservancy (SFC) has won a significant legal victory in its ongoing effort to force Vizio to publish the source code of its SmartCast TV software, which is said to contain GPLv2 and LGPLv2.1 copyleft-licensed components.

    SFC sued Vizio, claiming it was in breach of contract by failing to obey the terms of the GPLv2 and LGPLv2.1 licenses that require source code to be made public when certain conditions are met, and sought declaratory relief on behalf of Vizio TV owners. SFC wanted its breach-of-contract arguments to be heard by the Orange County Superior Court in California, though Vizio kicked the matter up to the district court level in central California where it hoped to avoid the contract issue and defend its corner using just federal copyright law.

    On Friday, Federal District Judge Josephine Staton sided with SFC and granted its motion to send its lawsuit back to superior court. To do so, Judge Staton had to decide whether or not the federal Copyright Act preempted the SFC's breach-of-contract allegations; in the end, she decided it didn't.

    Continue reading
  • US brings first-of-its-kind criminal charges of Bitcoin-based sanctions-busting
    Citizen allegedly moved $10m-plus in BTC into banned nation

    US prosecutors have accused an American citizen of illegally funneling more than $10 million in Bitcoin into an economically sanctioned country.

    It's said the resulting criminal charges of sanctions busting through the use of cryptocurrency are the first of their kind to be brought in the US.

    Under the United States' International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEA), it is illegal for a citizen or institution within the US to transfer funds, directly or indirectly, to a sanctioned country, such as Iran, Cuba, North Korea, or Russia. If there is evidence the IEEA was willfully violated, a criminal case should follow. If an individual or financial exchange was unwittingly involved in evading sanctions, they may be subject to civil action. 

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022