Storage firm Box: We're BIG enough... to FLOAT

IPO here we go, IPO ... IPO here we go, IPO, oh

Market concerns over the delayed public offering of personal cloud content manager Box could be easing, after it filed updated IPO documents showing reduced losses during a nine-month period in its fiscal 2015 year.

The offering, with the S1 document filed in March, was delayed initially as players saw the growing losses as counterbalancing increasing revenues, and making the stock financially unattractive. At that point, Box's financial picture looked, shall we say, challenging.

Losses, which were huge, and were growing as strongly as revenues. There was a train of thought that said a) file sync and share was a feature and not a product, and b) mainstream vendors would add it to their portfolio, such as EMC with Simplivity, and kill the 'sync and share' startups because of their enterprise presence and channel strength.


Upstarts such as Box quickly started adding value-added services on top of basic file sharing. This, together with (we suppose) tighter cost controls has caused a Box turnaround at the nine-month point for the current financial year (which ends 31 Jan, 2015), as can be seen below.


Here are the quarterly numbers:


In its latest third quarter revenues were $57m, 70 per cent more than the $33.6m reported a year ago. The net loss was $45.4m, lower than the year ago period's $51.4m.

The net loss has also reduced compared with the nine-month period a year ago. At this rate the full fiscal 2015 year numbers could show a reduced net loss compared with fiscal 2014's $168.6m.

Not only that, but revenues might, we stress "might", be more than the loss number. This is promising, and we might see the IPO in the first half of 2015.

However, all eyes will be on the revenue growth in its fourth quarter (and of course the net loss number). If it's less than a year ago then expect huge sighs of relief from all around, and people muttering "IPO here we go, IPO, IPO here we go, IPO, oh." ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • Tesla driver charged with vehicular manslaughter after deadly Autopilot crash

    Prosecution seems to be first of its kind in America

    A Tesla driver has seemingly become the first person in the US to be charged with vehicular manslaughter for a deadly crash in which the vehicle's Autopilot mode was engaged.

    According to the cops, the driver exited a highway in his Tesla Model S, ran a red light, and smashed into a Honda Civic at an intersection in Gardena, Los Angeles County, in late 2019. A man and woman in the second car were killed. The Tesla driver and a passenger survived and were taken to hospital.

    Prosecutors in California charged Kevin George Aziz Riad, 27, in October last year though details of the case are only just emerging, according to AP on Tuesday. Riad, a limousine service driver, is facing two counts of vehicular manslaughter, and is free on bail after pleading not guilty.

    Continue reading
  • AMD returns to smartphone graphics with new Samsung chip for your pocket computer

    We're back in black

    AMD's GPU technology is returning to mobile handsets with Samsung's Exynos 2200 system-on-chip, which was announced on Tuesday.

    The Exynos 2200 processor, fabricated using a 4nm process, has Armv9 CPU cores and the oddly named Xclipse GPU, which is an adaptation of AMD's RDNA 2 mainstream GPU architecture.

    AMD was in the handheld GPU market until 2009, when it sold the Imageon GPU and handheld business for $65m to Qualcomm, which turned the tech into the Adreno GPU for its Snapdragon family. AMD's Imageon processors were used in devices from Motorola, Panasonic, Palm and others making Windows Mobile handsets.

    Continue reading
  • Big shock: Guy who fled political violence and became rich in tech now struggles to care about political violence

    'I recognize that I come across as lacking empathy,' billionaire VC admits

    Billionaire tech investor and ex-Facebook senior executive Chamath Palihapitiya was publicly blasted after he said nobody really cares about the reported human rights abuse of Uyghur Muslims in China.

    The blunt comments were made during the latest episode of All-In, a podcast in which Palihapitiya chats to investors and entrepreneurs Jason Calacanis, David Sacks, and David Friedberg about technology.

    The group were debating the Biden administration’s response to what's said to be China's crackdown of Uyghur Muslims when Palihapitiya interrupted and said: “Nobody cares about what’s happening to the Uyghurs, okay? ... I’m telling you a very hard ugly truth, okay? Of all the things that I care about … yes, it is below my line.”

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022