Oh no, you're thinking, yet another cookie pop-up. Well, sorry, it's the law. We measure how many people read us, and ensure you see relevant ads, by storing cookies on your device. If you're cool with that, hit “Accept all Cookies”. For more info and to customize your settings, hit “Customize Settings”.

Review and manage your consent

Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them. You can also change your choices at any time, by hitting the “Your Consent Options” link on the site's footer.

Manage Cookie Preferences
  • These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features. Without these cookies we cannot provide you with the service that you expect.

  • These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. They perform functions like preventing the same ad from continuously reappearing, ensuring that ads are properly displayed for advertisers, and in some cases selecting advertisements that are based on your interests.

  • These cookies collect information in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used. They allow us to count visits and traffic sources so that we can measure and improve the performance of our sites. If people say no to these cookies, we do not know how many people have visited and we cannot monitor performance.

See also our Cookie policy and Privacy policy.

This article is more than 1 year old

Marriott: The TRUTH about personal Wi-Fi hotel jam bid

We'll just block conference and convention areas instead

The Marriott hotel chain – slammed for jamming guests' personal Wi-Fi hotspots – has tried to explain why it's asking for permission to interfere with wireless networks.

Marriott, Hilton, and the American Hotel & Lodging Association, had together petitioned US watchdog the Federal Communications Commission for clarification – they had asked if it was OK to limit either standalone Wi-Fi hotspots or wireless-tethered smartphones on the grounds they can hamper the hotel's own network.

Said jamming would not be performed by banned equipment and techniques, but by spamming Wi-Fi channels with dissociation packets, which require no authentication and effectively boot everyone off a particular network, for example.

The trio say the use of such personal hotspots is fine in guests' rooms, but not in other areas of the hotel. They claim this has nothing to do with protecting cash trousered from selling expensive Wi-Fi access in such areas, just that the hotspots could cause networking problems and open up security holes, allegedly.

Not surprisingly their petition was opposed by the likes of Microsoft and Google, and judging from the Reg forums quite a lot of readers are disgruntled at the suggestion. Now Marriott has issued a statement seeking to calm people down and explain itself.

"We understand there have been concerns regarding our position on the FCC petition filing, perhaps due to a lack of clarity about the issue. To be clear, this matter does not involve in any way Wi-Fi access in hotel guestrooms or lobby spaces," it said.

"The question at hand is what measures a network operator can take to detect and contain rogue and imposter Wi-Fi hotspots used in our meeting and conference spaces that pose a security threat to meeting or conference attendees or cause interference to the conference guest wireless network."

El Reg wonders what Marriott's IT admins are doing, if their networks are so flimsy that they can be disrupted by a $50 Wi-Fi hotspot.

So far there's no indication the FCC will listen to the poor, starving hotel chains. In October the agency fined the Marriott Gaylord Opryland in Nashville, Tennessee, $600,000 for blocking personal hotspots. ®

 

Similar topics

Similar topics

Similar topics

TIP US OFF

Send us news


Other stories you might like