Ukraine PM: Hacktivists? C'mon! Russian spies attacked Gov.DE

Bundestag, Merkel websites blockaded for hours


A pro-Russian group has claimed responsibility for attacks that floored German government websites on Wednesday, although Ukraine's PM is pointing the figure at Russia itself.

‪Hacktivists from CyberBerkut‬1 blockaded the websites of the Bundestag and Chancellor Merkel's office, demanding Berlin end support for the Ukrainian government.

The assault left the sites largely inaccessible from around from 09:00 GMT until early evening.

Assaults against German government websites are a daily occurrence. The severity and duration of Wednesday's assaults were however unusual.

Ukraine's prime minister Arseny Yatseniuk blamed Russian intelligence rather than hacktivists for orchestrating the assault. "I strongly recommend that the Russian secret services stop spending taxpayer money for cyber attacks against the Bundestag and Chancellor Merkel's office," he told ZDF TV, Reuters reports.

Yatsenyuk was due to meet Merkel in Berlin today (8 January), with sanctions against Russia and the ongoing conflict in the east of Ukraine expected to be high on the agenda. Russian state-funded cable and satellite television channel RT argues that CyberBerkut is solely behind the assault, which it attributes to anger at Yatsenyuk's "plans to use billions from the EU to fund war in the east of the country rather than rebuild it".

Attribution for attacks in cyberspace is a difficulty, and the issue is becoming more pressing as the internet is increasingly turning into an arena for sniping between nations.

The idea that the Russian state rather then pro-Russian activists might be behind the assault on German government websites is "possible, plausible & even probable" but this does not equal proven, noted Prof Alan Woodward of the University of Surrey, in a Twitter update.

Chris McIntosh, chief exec of secure communications outfit ViaSat UK, commented: "The fact that Russia’s alleged cyber attack against Germany is supposedly in response to its continued support of the Ukrainian government shows that these attacks are becoming the first weapon of choice for countries in conflict."

"This is further supported by the recent Sony hack, with North Korea taking the blame and subsequent counter-attacks taking down that country’s internet ascribed to the US," he added.

"The lines between private, public and military targets are blurring, and cyber attacks are now being looked to as an effective way of influencing other countries’ foreign policy. In this new landscape of threats, organisations in all sectors will need to be vigilant against a wider range of threats; not only from countries with significant resources at their disposal and the incentives to use them, but also from other actors working in hostile nations’ interests," he concluded.

Bootnote

1Ukraine's former (pro-Russian) president Viktor Yanukovich used "Berkut" riot squads against protesters prior to losing grip on power following violent protests last February. The ‪CyberBerkut‬ name deliberately references Yanukovich's controversial policing force.

The grouping has previously been linked to attacks on NATO websites and US private military companies but its main target has been Ukrainian government agencies and Kiev politicians.

Narrower topics


Other stories you might like

  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading
  • Big Tech loves talking up privacy – while trying to kill privacy legislation
    Study claims Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft work to derail data rules

    Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft often support privacy in public statements, but behind the scenes they've been working through some common organizations to weaken or kill privacy legislation in US states.

    That's according to a report this week from news non-profit The Markup, which said the corporations hire lobbyists from the same few groups and law firms to defang or drown state privacy bills.

    The report examined 31 states when state legislatures were considering privacy legislation and identified 445 lobbyists and lobbying firms working on behalf of Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft, along with industry groups like TechNet and the State Privacy and Security Coalition.

    Continue reading
  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022