UK.gov can't get farmers onto its Verify service – even to claim subsidies

It's oo-er not oo-arr down at the Government Digital Service


Significantly fewer farmers are registering online for the Common Agricultural Policy payments scheme than last year, despite government plans to create an online-only exemplar digital service, Freedom of Information numbers reveal.

As of 10 February, just 1,300 farmers have so far registered online with the Rural Payments Agency through the new identity assurance system Verify, compared with 32,000 who have used the alternative telephone system.

The deadline for all farmers to register for CAP payments is May.

In contrast, 70,000 farmers registered online last year. However, the RPA switched off the Government Gateway online identity system in October.

El Reg understands the major stumbling block with Verify is its failure to recognise businesses and third-party agents, such as accountants. This is a problem for many farmers.

The UK's Cabinet Office said it expects take-up to increase as the rural payments exemplar moves into public beta later this year.

But the service had originally intended to be fully live by next month.

According to the Government Digital Service Dashboard, 54 per cent of the users to have registered through Verify have successfully completed the process. There have so far been 17,000 verifications, which also include HMRC's self-assessment and PAYE.

By March 2016, GOV.UK Verify is intended to be the default way for people to prove their identity when using all government digital services.

However, there are currently 42 million Gateway online users, according to another Freedom of Information response sent to El Reg.

While it is likely that individuals will be registered for a number of Gateway services, the scale of moving all these users over to Verify by next year's deadline is clearly enormous.

A Cabinet Office spokesperson said:

GOV.UK Verify is a new, innovative way for people to verify their identity online when using government services. It forms a key part of our work to transform government services to make them digital by default.

The service is in the early phase of public use and is yet to go "live". We're collecting feedback from users and continuing to test, monitor, and improve the system. We’re also working with a range of identity providers to ensure we offer choice, control and privacy for users.

®


Other stories you might like

  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading
  • Big Tech loves talking up privacy – while trying to kill privacy legislation
    Study claims Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft work to derail data rules

    Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft often support privacy in public statements, but behind the scenes they've been working through some common organizations to weaken or kill privacy legislation in US states.

    That's according to a report this week from news non-profit The Markup, which said the corporations hire lobbyists from the same few groups and law firms to defang or drown state privacy bills.

    The report examined 31 states when state legislatures were considering privacy legislation and identified 445 lobbyists and lobbying firms working on behalf of Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft, along with industry groups like TechNet and the State Privacy and Security Coalition.

    Continue reading
  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022