16 telco heads request data retention funding info from Turnbull, Brandis

At least tell us what per cent you'll pay, cry carriers


The chief executive officers of 16 Australian telcos have written to the nation's attorney-general George Brandis and communications minister Malcolm Turnbull with a call for dialog on how much money they can expect to fund the development of metadata retention systems.

“We write as the Chief Executive Officers/Senior Executives of a broad spectrum of Australian telecommunications carriers and carriage service providers (C/CSPs) to seek clarity as to the Government’s stated intention to provide a contribution to the upfront capital expenses that may fall on our industry sector following the anticipated debate and potential passage of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment (Data Retention) Bill 2014,” the letter opens.

The authors beef is that “We note that the Government has variously indicated it will make a 'reasonable' or 'substantial' contribution to these costs,” but that there's no indication of how much money the government attaches to either term. Australia's government has said it feels AU$319.1 million quoted as the upper limit to costs required to implement metadata retention “is less than 1 per cent of the $43 billion in revenue generated by the telecommunications industry annually”, the implication being that carriers can absorb a one per cent hit without much pain, or passing on price rises to customers.

The letter addresses that issue by making a request that “ … the Government provide to industry, the Parliament and the wider community a degree of certainty as to the size of the Government’s planned contribution (and the planned methodology for apportioning those funds between C/CSPs of differing types and market shares) in advance of the Bill being debated and potentially passed into law.”

“It is evident that the extent to which the Government’s contribution falls short of the total cost to industry will determine the quantum of additional costs to be absorbed by C/CSPs or passed on to Australian telecommunications users,” the letter says. “In light of these factors, we believe it would be a reasonable action on the part of Government to – at the very least – provide a firm indication of the Government contribution, expressed as a percentage of the final determined cost.”

The letter asks for an “early response” on how much money the government will contribute, given that the bill will be debated this week.

Prime Minister Tony Abbott, for his part, has previously expressed a belief that Australia's food importers should be relieved of some regulations to compensate them for new food-labelling regulations. The carriers who put their name to this letter haven't tested the that principle of now new regulation.

Meanwhile, it's also emerged that the planned data retention laws will be amended to make issue of a warrant essential before probing journalists' metadata. ®

Similar topics

Broader topics


Other stories you might like

  • Samsung fined $14 million for misleading smartphone water resistance claims
    Promoted phones as ready for a dunking – forgot to mention known problems with subsequent recharges

    Australia’s Competition and Consumer Commission has fined Samsung Electronics AU$14 million ($9.6 million) for making for misleading water resistance claims about 3.1 million smartphones.

    The Commission (ACCC) says that between 2016 and 2018 Samsung advertised its Galaxy S7, S7 Edge, A5, A7, S8, S8 Plus and Note 8 smartphones as capable of surviving short submersions in the sea or fresh water.

    As it happens The Register attended the Australian launch of the Note 8 and watched on in wonder as it survived a brief dunking and bubbles appeared to emerge from within the device. Your correspondent recalls Samsung claiming that the waterproofing reflected the aim of designing a phone that could handle Australia's outdoors lifestyle.

    Continue reading
  • Five Eyes alliance’s top cop says techies are the future of law enforcement
    Crims have weaponized tech and certain States let them launder the proceeds

    Australian Federal Police (AFP) commissioner Reece Kershaw has accused un-named nations of helping organized criminals to use technology to commit and launder the proceeds of crime, and called for international collaboration to developer technologies that counter the threats that behaviour creates.

    Kershaw’s remarks were made at a meeting of the Five Eyes Law Enforcement Group (FELEG), the forum in which members of the Five Eyes intelligence sharing pact – Australia, New Zealand, Canada, the UK and the USA – discuss policing and related matters. Kershaw is the current chair of FELEG.

    “Criminals have weaponized technology and have become ruthlessly efficient at finding victims,” Kerhsaw told the group, before adding : “State actors and citizens from some nations are using our countries at the expense of our sovereignty and economies.”

    Continue reading
  • Police lab wants your happy childhood pictures to train AI to detect child abuse
    Like the Hotdog, Not Hotdog app but more Kidnapped, Not Kidnapped

    Updated Australia's federal police and Monash University are asking netizens to send in snaps of their younger selves to train a machine-learning algorithm to spot child abuse in photographs.

    Researchers are looking to collect images of people aged 17 and under in safe scenarios; they don't want any nudity, even if it's a relatively innocuous picture like a child taking a bath. The crowdsourcing campaign, dubbed My Pictures Matter, is open to those aged 18 and above, who can consent to having their photographs be used for research purposes.

    All the images will be amassed into a dataset managed by Monash academics in an attempt to train an AI model to tell the difference between a minor in a normal environment and an exploitative, unsafe situation. The software could, in theory, help law enforcement better automatically and rapidly pinpoint child sex abuse material (aka CSAM) in among thousands upon thousands of photographs under investigation, avoiding having human analysts inspect every single snap.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022