Fujitsu presents the mighty ETERNUS as new disaster-proof hero

For when flashy failure is just not an option


Fujitsu’s ETERNUS DX200F all-flash array (AFA) is always up for it even in the face of catastrophes, the firm says.

The DX200 all-flash array was announced in April last year, offering the same performance – Fujitsu said – as specially-designed flash architectures, but for less money, due to its standard system architecture: meaning SSDs and no special hardware.

It then came out with an SPC-1 lowest-ever response time benchmark win.

That has since been beaten by Fujitsu’s own DX600 S3 array.

The DX200F is disaster proof according to Fujitsu, with data synced between two DX200F systems using storage clustering. Should one fail, the other automatically takes over, with users not seeing any downtime. All application access is maintained in real time.

Fujitsu DX200F

Fujitsu DX200F detail

Fujitsu says the DX200F’s all-flash array performance, combined with “complete disaster resilience... is currently unique in today’s market”. In other words, Fujitsu would have us understand no other all-flash array from any vendor offers complete disaster resilience. So the DX200F is presented as the only AFA suitable for mission-critical usage where system failure is not an option.

EMC might suggest that a combination of VPLEX and two XtremIO arrays could offer the same level of automated failover against disaster.

The DX200F array features 5-24 SSDs providing up to 38.4TB of capacity. Failover can be controlled manually, for scenarios such as planned power shutdowns, disaster recovery tests and non-disruptive upgrades.

The DX200F is available now from Fujitsu or its channel. Prices vary depending on configuration and region. ®

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Saved by the Bill: What if... Microsoft had killed Windows 95?

    Now this looks like a job for me, 'cos we need a little, controversy... 'Cos it feels so NT, without me

    Veteran Microsoft vice president, Brad Silverberg, has paid tribute to former Microsoft boss Bill Gates for saving Windows 95 from the clutches of the Redmond Axe-swinger.

    Silverberg posted his comment in a Twitter exchange started by Fast co-founder Allison Barr Allen regarding somebody who'd changed your life. Silverberg responded "Bill Gates" and, in response to a question from senior cybersecurity professional and director at Microsoft, Ashanka Iddya, explained Gates' role in Windows 95's survival.

    Continue reading
  • UK government opens consultation on medic-style register for Brit infosec pros

    Are you competent? Ethical? Welcome to UKCSC's new list

    Frustrated at lack of activity from the "standard setting" UK Cyber Security Council, the government wants to pass new laws making it into the statutory regulator of the UK infosec trade.

    Government plans, quietly announced in a consultation document issued last week, include a formal register of infosec practitioners – meaning security specialists could be struck off or barred from working if they don't meet "competence and ethical requirements."

    The proposed setup sounds very similar to the General Medical Council and its register of doctors allowed to practice medicine in the UK.

    Continue reading
  • Microsoft's do-it-all IDE Visual Studio 2022 came out late last year. How good is it really?

    Top request from devs? A Linux version

    Review Visual Studio goes back a long way. Microsoft always had its own programming languages and tools, beginning with Microsoft Basic in 1975 and Microsoft C 1.0 in 1983.

    The Visual Studio idea came from two main sources. In the early days, Windows applications were coded and compiled using MS-DOS, and there was a MS-DOS IDE called Programmer's Workbench (PWB, first released 1989). The company also came up Visual Basic (VB, first released 1991), which unlike Microsoft C++ had a Windows IDE. Perhaps inspired by VB, Microsoft delivered Visual C++ 1.0 in 1993, replacing the little-used PWB. Visual Studio itself was introduced in 1997, though it was more of a bundle of different Windows development tools initially. The first Visual Studio to integrate C++ and Visual Basic (in .NET guise) development into the same IDE was Visual Studio .NET in 2002, 20 years ago, and this perhaps is the true ancestor of today's IDE.

    A big change in VS 2022, released November, is that it is the first version where the IDE itself runs as a 64-bit process. The advantage is that it has access to more than 4GB memory in the devenv process, this being the shell of the IDE, though of course it is still possible to compile 32-bit applications. The main benefit is for large solutions comprising hundreds of projects. Although a substantial change, it is transparent to developers and from what we can tell, has been a beneficial change.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022