Assange™ lawyers demand Swedish prosecution files or no London interview

Our client is happy to stew in his own juice some more


Lawyers for Julian Assange™ have said they want access to all files held by Swedish prosecutors on their client before they can grant an interview with him.

According to an AFP report, Assange's defence is to demand access to the Swedish officials' "förundersökningsprotokoll", a dossier normally only made available to the defence when the investigation phase has been completed, before a trial indictment "stämningsansökan" is filed.

The prosecutors wish to question Assange regarding allegations of sexual misconduct in Sweden while he was visiting the country in 2010. Having subsequently travelled to the UK, where he faced attempts to extradite him back to Sweden, Assange breached British bail conditions by taking sanctuary in the Ecuadorian embassy in London. He has now remained there for four years. Assange and his legal team have always maintained that he is at greater risk of extradition to the USA (over the Wikileaks/Manning affair which brought him to fame) in Sweden than he would be in Britain.

It was thought that the long-running deadlock which has seen Assange confined to the small Ecuadorian diplomatic premises in London for years might be at an end, with the recent suggestion that Swedish prosecutors would be willing to interview him there. But it remains unclear that this will take place.

Mark Klamberg, a legal expert at Uppsala University, told the Reg today:

"The Swedish prosecutor wants to question Assange before they complete the investigation – when this is done, Assange has the right to access the prosecution files."

Baltasar Garzón, head of Assange's legal team, told the AFP:

"We need to be provided access to the entirety of the proceedings, which for four and half years has been in the hands of the Swedish prosecution and not in the hands of the defence."

Garzón stated that the Assange defence team had yet to respond to the Swedish authorities' request for an interrogation to take place at the embassy.

"Of course we will agree to the interrogation, but they have to guarantee minimum prerequisites," he said, stressing that giving the defence access to the investigation files was "simply the minimum rights of any person subjected to a judicial process".

The request for full disclosure of the case file is non-standard procedure under Swedish law at this stage and has drawn criticism that Assange is actually seeking to avoid the interview. Klamberg, an expert in international law, told the Reg that Baltasar Garzón's request "lacks legal basis at this stage of the proceedings.

"Under Swedish law, and it follows from international human rights law, a defendant has the right to access or get hold of evidence and other material that prosecutor intends to use or has in his/her possession. However, this right may be derogated from to protect ongoing investigations provided that the defendant at a later point of time - but prior to the commencement of a trial - can access the information. Part of the rationale for this is that a suspect should not be able to adjust his/her story when questioned by the police."

Swedish Prosecution Authority spokesperson Karin Rosander told The Register that the prosecution's "normal procedure in interview situations is to provide some information to the defence team, but not everything relating to the matter," adding that "No formal request [from Assange's defence] has yet been made."

The Swedish prosecutor's statement regarding the possible London interview can be read here.

Klamberg told us that in his estimation several parties bore the responsibility for the current situation, but he was firm in stating that:

"Assange is responsible for breaching UK bail conditions and seeking asylum at the Ecuadorian embassy."

El Reg will update with a WikiLeaks response when and if one is received. ®


Other stories you might like

  • Twitter founder Dorsey beats hasty retweet from the board
    As shareholders sue the social network amid Elon Musk's takeover scramble

    Twitter has officially entered the post-Dorsey age: its founder and two-time CEO's board term expired Wednesday, marking the first time the social media company hasn't had him around in some capacity.

    Jack Dorsey announced his resignation as Twitter chief exec in November 2021, and passed the baton to Parag Agrawal while remaining on the board. Now that board term has ended, and Dorsey has stepped down as expected. Agrawal has taken Dorsey's board seat; Salesforce co-CEO Bret Taylor has assumed the role of Twitter's board chair. 

    In his resignation announcement, Dorsey – who co-founded and is CEO of Block (formerly Square) – said having founders leading the companies they created can be severely limiting for an organization and can serve as a single point of failure. "I believe it's critical a company can stand on its own, free of its founder's influence or direction," Dorsey said. He didn't respond to a request for further comment today. 

    Continue reading
  • Snowflake stock drops as some top customers cut usage
    You might say its valuation is melting away

    IPO darling Snowflake's share price took a beating in an already bearish market for tech stocks after filing weaker than expected financial guidance amid a slowdown in orders from some of its largest customers.

    For its first quarter of fiscal 2023, ended April 30, Snowflake's revenue grew 85 percent year-on-year to $422.4 million. The company made an operating loss of $188.8 million, albeit down from $205.6 million a year ago.

    Although surpassing revenue expectations, the cloud-based data warehousing business saw its valuation tumble 16 percent in extended trading on Wednesday. Its stock price dived from $133 apiece to $117 in after-hours trading, and today is cruising back at $127. That stumble arrived amid a general tech stock sell-off some observers said was overdue.

    Continue reading
  • Amazon investors nuke proposed ethics overhaul and say yes to $212m CEO pay
    Workplace safety, labor organizing, sustainability and, um, wage 'fairness' all struck down in vote

    Amazon CEO Andy Jassy's first shareholder meeting was a rousing success for Amazon leadership and Jassy's bank account. But for activist investors intent on making Amazon more open and transparent, it was nothing short of a disaster.

    While actual voting results haven't been released yet, Amazon general counsel David Zapolsky told Reuters that stock owners voted down fifteen shareholder resolutions addressing topics including workplace safety, labor organizing, sustainability, and pay fairness. Amazon's board recommended voting no on all of the proposals.

    Jassy and the board scored additional victories in the form of shareholder approval for board appointments, executive compensation and a 20-for-1 stock split. Jassy's executive compensation package, which is tied to Amazon stock price and mostly delivered as stock awards over a multi-year period, was $212 million in 2021. 

    Continue reading
  • Confirmed: Broadcom, VMware agree to $61b merger
    Unless anyone out there can make a better offer. Oh, Elon?

    Broadcom has confirmed it intends to acquire VMware in a deal that looks set to be worth $61 billion, if it goes ahead: the agreement provides for a “go-shop” provision under which the virtualization giant may solicit alternative offers.

    Rumors of the proposed merger emerged earlier this week, amid much speculation, but neither of the companies was prepared to comment on the deal before today, when it was disclosed that the boards of directors of both organizations have unanimously approved the agreement.

    Michael Dell and Silver Lake investors, which own just over half of the outstanding shares in VMware between both, have apparently signed support agreements to vote in favor of the transaction, so long as the VMware board continues to recommend the proposed transaction with chip designer Broadcom.

    Continue reading
  • Perl Steering Council lays out a backwards compatible future for Perl 7
    Sensibly written code only, please. Plus: what all those 'heated discussions' were about

    The much-anticipated Perl 7 continues to twinkle in the distance although the final release of 5.36.0 is "just around the corner", according to the Perl Steering Council.

    Well into its fourth decade, the fortunes of Perl have ebbed and flowed over the years. Things came to a head last year, with the departure of former "pumpking" Sawyer X, following what he described as community "hostility."

    Part of the issue stemmed from the planned version 7 release, a key element of which, according to a post by the steering council "was to significantly reduce the boilerplate needed at the top of your code, by enabling a lot of widely used modules / pragmas."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022