Oh no, you're thinking, yet another cookie pop-up. Well, sorry, it's the law. We measure how many people read us, and ensure you see relevant ads, by storing cookies on your device. If you're cool with that, hit “Accept all Cookies”. For more info and to customize your settings, hit “Customize Settings”.

Review and manage your consent

Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them. You can also change your choices at any time, by hitting the “Your Consent Options” link on the site's footer.

Manage Cookie Preferences
  • These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features. Without these cookies we cannot provide you with the service that you expect.

  • These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. They perform functions like preventing the same ad from continuously reappearing, ensuring that ads are properly displayed for advertisers, and in some cases selecting advertisements that are based on your interests.

  • These cookies collect information in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used. They allow us to count visits and traffic sources so that we can measure and improve the performance of our sites. If people say no to these cookies, we do not know how many people have visited and we cannot monitor performance.

See also our Cookie policy and Privacy policy.

This article is more than 1 year old

Hawk like an Egyptian: Google is HOPPING MAD over fake SSL certs

How the world of certificate authorities is broken, part 94

Updated Google says security biz MCS Holdings has created unauthorized SSL certificates for some Google-owned websites.

Anyone with these dodgy certificates could, in theory, set up a web server that masquerades as a legit Google site, and redirect people to the fake site by hijacking their DNS. Chrome and the latest Firefox web browsers should detect the interception, and refuse to talk to the server, but other browsers may have continued to the bogus websites none the wiser, allowing passwords, emails, and other details to slip into the wrong hands.

MCS is an intermediate certificate authority based in Egypt. The dodgy Google certificates could be sold to corporate IT departments, allowing admins to intercept and inspect employees' encrypted internet traffic to Google servers while at work. There is no suggestion at this stage that the certificates were used for malicious purposes.

The Google certs were crafted using an intermediate certificate issued by the major Chinese certification authority CNNIC, which is trusted by browsers and operating systems.

If you or I were to create a gmail.com SSL certificate, and plonk it on a website dressed up to look like a Gmail login page, no browser would trust it because it is disconnected from the chain of trust that holds the world of SSL together – the HTTPS connection would be rejected. But in the case of MCS, the Google domain certs were ultimately backed by a trusted authority – CNNIC. It's feared MCS has issued certs for other websites so bosses can snoop on staff; the ease at which bogus certificates can be issued, and perhaps stolen and used in the wild, concerns security experts.

It's yet another example of a fundamental problem with cryptographic certificate authorities. In the end, Chrome and Firefox's certificate pinning sidestepped the mess of trusting intermediates.

"CNNIC is included in all major root stores and so the mis-issued certificates would be trusted by almost all browsers and operating systems," Google security engineer Adam Langley blogged.

"Chrome on Windows, OS X, and Linux, ChromeOS, and Firefox 33 and greater, would have rejected these certificates because of public-key pinning, although mis-issued certificates for other sites likely exist."

Google spotted the problem on March 20, and alerted the Chinese cert body, which dealt with the issue on March 22 by revoking MCS' intermediate certificate. Google and Firefox-maker Mozilla have instructed their software to reject the dodgy certificates.

"We have no indication of abuse and we are not suggesting that people change passwords or take other action," Langley said. "At this time we are considering what further actions are appropriate." ®

Updated to add

MCS has said in a statement "the reported issue is a human mistake that took place unintentionally through a single PC inside MCS Lab which had been dedicated for testing purposes."

 

Similar topics

TIP US OFF

Send us news


Other stories you might like