Oh no, you're thinking, yet another cookie pop-up. Well, sorry, it's the law. We measure how many people read us, and ensure you see relevant ads, by storing cookies on your device. If you're cool with that, hit “Accept all Cookies”. For more info and to customize your settings, hit “Customize Settings”.

Review and manage your consent

Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them. You can also change your choices at any time, by hitting the “Your Consent Options” link on the site's footer.

Manage Cookie Preferences
  • These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features. Without these cookies we cannot provide you with the service that you expect.

  • These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. They perform functions like preventing the same ad from continuously reappearing, ensuring that ads are properly displayed for advertisers, and in some cases selecting advertisements that are based on your interests.

  • These cookies collect information in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used. They allow us to count visits and traffic sources so that we can measure and improve the performance of our sites. If people say no to these cookies, we do not know how many people have visited and we cannot monitor performance.

See also our Cookie policy and Privacy policy.

This article is more than 1 year old

TOP500 Supers make boffins more prolific

Universities with big iron become bigger publishers, better PhD factories

A comparative analysis of supercomputer ownership by US universities seems to suggest that TOP500-class iron gives institutions a quantifiable edge in physics, chemistry, civil engineering and evolutionary biology.

In the kind of rational decision-making that will upset HPC sales teams, the Clemson University research is designed to help US universities make the purchase decision based on economics rather than the more usual “whose super is more super?”

The researchers divided 212 institutions into haves and have-nots according to whether they had a TOP500 entry, and evaluated research efficiency against the number and academic performance of researchers, the number of publications, and the number of PhDs awarded.

Supers double the efficiency of chemistry research, the study found; in civil engineering the payoff was about 35 per cent greater efficiency, while evolutionary biology got an 11 per cent boost and physics was nine per cent more efficient.

Perhaps surprisingly, research output in computer sciences didn't improve with HPC ownership, nor english or economics.

As economist Paul Wilson explains in the university's canned release, the research provides a “first step in creating a model for evaluating investments in high-performance computing”.

The research has been published in the journal Empirical Economics (abstract here). ®

 

Similar topics

Similar topics

Similar topics

TIP US OFF

Send us news


Other stories you might like