Yes, AT&T, you do have to go to court with the FTC

Judge declines to make throttling charges go away

AT&T will be forced to go to court with the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) over its handling of unlimited data plans.

Judge Edward Chen has struck down (PDF) AT&T's motion to have the FTC complaint dismissed, an order that will force the US telco giant to face charges of violating the Federal Trade Commission Act.

Last October the FTC sued AT&T, alleging the carrier tricked customers in describing its data plans as unlimited. AT&T allows customers to access as much data as they want, but slows connection speeds by up to 90 per cent once the user passes 2GB in a one-month period.

The complaint argues that AT&T does not do enough to warn customers of its policy and charges excessive fees when users ask to cancel their plans.

AT&T has maintained that its policies are perfectly legal and in line with practices used by other major US carriers. Lawyers for AT&T had asked Judge Chen to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that its 'common carrier' status exempts AT&T from the FTC rules, a motion the San Francisco district court shot down on Tuesday.

The phone giant argued that as a common carrier, it is exempted from the Federal Trade Commission Act and should instead answer to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Because of this, AT&T believes the FTC does not have jurisdiction in the matter and cannot sue.

Chen noted that the data service AT&T offers is not currently a common carrier service, and even when the FCC moves forward with its reclassification plan, the FTC would have a case that is not actually suing AT&T over the practice of throttling, but its handling of the policy.

"The problem with AT&T’s position is that, even though the FTC has characterized Count I as implicating an unfair practice, the gravamen of the FTC’s complaint is based on AT&T’s failure to disclose its throttling practice to certain customers," the judge wrote.

No date for the trial has been given as yet. ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • The future: Windows streaming through notched Apple screens

    Choice is the word for Jamf's Dean Hager

    Interview As Apple's devices continue to find favour with enterprise users, the fortress that is Windows appears to be under attack in the corporate world.

    Speaking to The Register as the Jamf Nation User Conference wound down, the software firm's CEO, Dean Hager, is - unsurprisingly - ebullient when it comes to the prospects for Apple gear in the world of suits.

    Jamf specialises in device management and authentication, and has long been associated with managing Apple hardware in business and education environments. In recent years it has begun connecting its products with services such as Microsoft's Azure Active Directory as administrators face up to a hybrid working future.

    Continue reading
  • There’s a wave of ransomware coming down the pipeline. What can you do about it?

    AI can help. Here’s how…

    Sponsored The Colonial Pipeline attack earlier this year showed just how devastating a ransomware attack is when it is targeted at critical infrastructure.

    It also illustrated how traditional security techniques are increasingly struggling to keep pace with determined cyber attackers, whether their aim is exfiltrating data, extorting organisations, or simply causing chaos. Or, indeed an unpleasant combination of all three.

    So, what are your options? More people looking for more flaws isn’t going to be enough – there simply aren’t enough skilled people, there are too many bugs, and there are way too many attackers. So, it’s clear that smart cyber defenders need to be supplemented by even smarter technology incorporating AI. You can learn what this looks like by checking out this upcoming Regcast, “Securing Critical Infrastructure from Cyber-attack” on October 28 at 5pm.

    Continue reading
  • Ransomware criminals have feelings too: BlackMatter abuse caused crims to shut down negotiation portal

    Or so says infsec outfit Emsisoft

    Hurling online abuse at ransomware gangs may have contributed to a hardline policy of dumping victims' data online, according to counter-ransomware company Emsisoft.

    Earlier this month, the Conti ransomware gang declared it would publish victims' data and break off ransom negotiations if anyone other than "respected journalist and researcher personalities" [sic] dared publish snippets of ransomware negotiations, amid a general hardening of attitudes among ransomware gangs.

    Typically these conversation snippets make it into the public domain because curious people log into ransomware negotiation portals hosted by the criminals. The BlackMatter (aka DarkSide) gang's portal credentials (detailed in a ransom note) became exposed to the wider world, however, and the resulting wave of furious abuse hurled at the crims prompted them to pull up the virtual drawbridge.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021