We're hyperconverged too, says Riverbed as it issues SteelFusion 4

ESXi injection brings bare metal excitement to branch offices


Hyperconverged infrastructure is the buzzphrase of the moment, and Riverbed's decided it wants some of that buzz by decreeing thath the fourth iteration of its SteelFusion appliances are, indeed, hyperconverged.

SteelFusion is a server and WAN optimisation box in one package. The idea is to put the smaller versions of the box at the edge of a network – say in a branch office – and bigger ones in your data centre.

Data synchronises between the edge and the core, but the boxes have enough grunt to run a decent app out on the edge inside a virtual machine. Apps on the edge point at LUNs in the data centre, and those LUNs reside on whatever storage array you fancy.

WAN optimisation, a Riverbed speciality, makes the arrangement tolerable from the latency point of view.

SteelFusion 4.0, announced today, advances this argument by adding ESXi to the mix, so that edge locations can now operate virtual machines on bare metal instead of pfaffing about with operating systems to host hypervisors. Core counts out at the edge now rise to twenty, and they're all Ivy Bridge cores if you're willing to pay. RAM can rise to 256GB, which means more VMs and faster everything.

There's also a dedicated server for WAN optimisation, so that servers running apps are no longer asked to lend a few cycles to networking duties.

Storage is now tiered, with flash in the box so that frequently-accessed data gets in users' faces faster. Tiering also helps with data synchronisation: the stuff that edge users really want is shuttled to remote SteelFusions and popped on the right medium. Other stuff stays back on the LUN in the data centre. It's also possible to do file and print services at the edge, with local storage doing the heavy lifting.

Failover can now span two data centres: if your core SteelFusion rig goes down, flick the switch to another in second bit barn. Or to a virtual SteelFusion in a cloud.

SteelFusion remains a decent way to do branch office IT. Whether it is hyperconvergence as the likes of Nutanix, VMware or Simplivity define it is another matter. That gang of three probably don't care: they're going after the data centre core while Riverbed's playing at the edges.

So if someone decides to pop some SteelFusions at the edge and run up a virtual SteelFusion core on an EVO:RAIL or Nutanix box, everyone wins. See? Hyperconvergence can solve everything. ®


Other stories you might like

  • VMware customers have watched Broadcom's acquisitions and don't like what they see
    It's not hard to find unpleasant precedents for what might happen to Virtzilla

    VMware customers have seen companies acquired by Broadcom Software emerge with lower profiles, slower innovation, and higher prices - a combination that makes them nervous about the virtualization giant’s future.

    The Register offers that assessment after spending the day at a VMware user group conference in Melbourne, Australia, where we interviewed over a dozen VMware customers to ascertain their reaction to Broadcom’s surprise acquisition of the virtualisation giant. The customers all requested that The Register not use their names, or those of their employers, as none were authorized to speak to the media.

    One of those customers was a sysadmin at a sporting organisation that has decided to drop Symantec products because product evolution has slowed under Broadcom’s ownership. The sysadmin has also heard, from multiple sources including Broadcom partners, that the company uses price hikes to discourage customers it does not want.

    Continue reading
  • Confirmed: Broadcom, VMware agree to $61b merger
    Unless anyone out there can make a better offer. Oh, Elon?

    Broadcom has confirmed it intends to acquire VMware in a deal that looks set to be worth $61 billion, if it goes ahead: the agreement provides for a “go-shop” provision under which the virtualization giant may solicit alternative offers.

    Rumors of the proposed merger emerged earlier this week, amid much speculation, but neither of the companies was prepared to comment on the deal before today, when it was disclosed that the boards of directors of both organizations have unanimously approved the agreement.

    Michael Dell and Silver Lake investors, which own just over half of the outstanding shares in VMware between both, have apparently signed support agreements to vote in favor of the transaction, so long as the VMware board continues to recommend the proposed transaction with chip designer Broadcom.

    Continue reading
  • Broadcom to 'focus on rapid transition to subscriptions' for VMware
    Offers comforting vision for core customers, products, channel – though warns efficiencies are coming

    Broadcom has signaled its $61 billion acquisition of VMware will involve a “rapid transition from perpetual licenses to subscriptions.”

    That's according to Tom Krause, president of the Broadcom Software Group, on Thursday's Broadcom earnings call. He was asked how the semiconductor giant plans to deliver on its guidance that VMware will add approximately $8.5 billion of pro forma EBITDA to Broadcom within three years of the deal closing – significant growth given VMware currently produces about $4.7 billion. And subscriptions was the answer.

    Krause also repeatedly said Broadcom intends to invest in VMware’s key product portfolio and is pleased to be acquiring a sales organization and channel relationships that give it reach Broadcom does not currently enjoy.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022