IBM: We're the reassuringly expensive cloud

Gartner's first DR-as-a-service Magic Quadrant puts Sungard and Big Blue on top


Ahead of Amazon.com breaking out results for Amazon Web Services last week, IBM wrote to let us know that not only does it haul in about US$7.7 billion a year with cloud and software-as-a-service but that it does so with “higher-value, higher profit cloud opportunities” rather than “low-end commoditized cloud offerings.”

We mention that stance in light of the debut of Gartner's first ever Magic Quadrant for Disaster Recovery as a Service (DraaS) which, as the graphic at bottom shows, just about puts Big Blue on top.

Gartner reckons that “By 2018, the number of organizations using disaster recovery as a service will exceed the number of organizations using traditional, syndicated recovery services.” Hence the new quadrant, which considers three flavours of DRaaS:

  • Disaster recovery as a service (DRaaS): The service provider manages virtual machine (VM) replication and, optionally, physical machine (PM) replication from the production data center into the cloud, VM/PM activation inside the cloud and recovery exercising within the cloud.
  • Recovery using infrastructure as a service (IaaS): The customer manages VM replication from the production data center into the cloud, the provider manages VM activation inside the cloud and the customer manages recovery exercising within the cloud.
  • Recovery using backup as a service (BaaS): The provider manages VM backup from the production data center into the cloud, the customer requests VM restoration (either inside or outside the cloud) and the customer manages recovery exercising (either inside or outside of the cloud).

The new quadrant only considers services that had been operating for a year as of September 1st, 2014. Which explains why the likes of Azure Site Recovery don't get a mention.

On IBM, Gartner notes that Big Blue's DraaS is about as comprehensive as it gets and IBM has extensive services to back its offering. But the analyst also cautions that “IBM's recurring monthly service pricing for VMs and the supporting storage can command a premium over other providers.” There's also a warning that “Reference customers cited the need for improvement in IBM's service billing transparency” and another suggesting a “need for improvement from IBM in supporting recovery time SLAs.”

Which sounds pretty much like the messaging we were sent: IBM seems to be offering a higher-value, higher-margin service.

Among the other players, the best-positioned player Sungard wins praise for its comprehensive range of DraaS services and impressive multitenancy arrangements, with a little concern expressed about the current paucity of integration with on-premises backup. NTT's ease of use gets a big tick, as does Seagate's arrangements whereby “Virtual CPU and storage capacity can be burst up to 15% beyond the allocated capacity at no extra charge.”

That's not unique: the study reports “Verizon's customers can burst as much additional CPU and RAM as they need, to support an actual disaster declaration, at no extra charge.”

Verizon also has an interesting arrangement whereby 'little integration exists between Verizon's VDR operations management software and customers' on-premises management utilities”. That's a feature, not a bug, as it is designed “to allow … customers to retain full management accountability for their security environment.”

Maybe that's given users the experience to suggest “... the need for Verizon to improve its operations security and end-user privacy management.”

VMware is considered a niche player and to be in its early days, but wins praise for simple pricing and short – one month – commitment requirements.

Disaster Recovery as a Service magic quadrant April 2015

Your correspondent was a little surprised to see Acronis on the Quadrant, but Gartner praises it for customer satisfaction and a good user console. The company's geographic spread is also good – it has three bit barns in the USA and the same number in Europe, plus one with a partner in Japan.

As we've noted above, the quadrant doesn't mention Azure. Which is a pity because Microsoft is evolving its service rapidly. If Redmond had made the list, it might not have gone well as Gartner reckons “ … that in many cases, fixed recurring pricing per VM per month can sometimes be prohibitively costly, especially when an in-scope configuration consists of hundreds of VMs”

Per-VM pricing is Microsoft's current play.

IBM, meanwhile, can not only get away with being quite expensive but brag about it. Unless you, dear readers, remind them of the quotes above and ask if they're really worth it! ®


Other stories you might like

  • Gartner predicts 9.5% drop in PC shipments
    Stark contrast to 11 percent increase year-over-year in 2021 shipments

    The party is over for PC makers as figures from Gartner suggest the market is on course for a breathtaking decline this year.

    According to the analysts, worldwide PC shipments will decline by 9.5 percent, with consumer demand leading the way – a 13.5 percent drop is forecast, far greater than business PC demand, which is expected to drop by 7.2 percent year on year.

    The PC market in the EMEA region is forecast to fare even worse, with a 14 percent decline on the cards for 2022. Gartner pointed the finger of blame at uncertainty caused by conflicts, price increases and simple unavailability of products. Lockdowns in China were also blamed for an impact in consumer demand.

    Continue reading
  • Mega's unbreakable encryption proves to be anything but
    Boffins devise five attacks to expose private files

    Mega, the New Zealand-based file-sharing biz co-founded a decade ago by Kim Dotcom, promotes its "privacy by design" and user-controlled encryption keys to claim that data stored on Mega's servers can only be accessed by customers, even if its main system is taken over by law enforcement or others.

    The design of the service, however, falls short of that promise thanks to poorly implemented encryption. Cryptography experts at ETH Zurich in Switzerland on Tuesday published a paper describing five possible attacks that can compromise the confidentiality of users' files.

    The paper [PDF], titled "Mega: Malleable Encryption Goes Awry," by ETH cryptography researchers Matilda Backendal and Miro Haller, and computer science professor Kenneth Paterson, identifies "significant shortcomings in Mega’s cryptographic architecture" that allow Mega, or those able to mount a TLS MITM attack on Mega's client software, to access user files.

    Continue reading
  • Small in Japan: Hitachi creates its own (modest) cloud
    VMware-powered sovereign cloud not going to challenge hyperscalers, and won't be repeated beyond Japan

    Updated Hitachi has taken a modest step towards becoming a public cloud provider, with the launch of a VMware-powered cloud in Japan that The Register understands may not be its only such venture.

    The Japanese giant has styled the service a "sovereign cloud" – a term that VMware introduced to distinguish some of its 4,000-plus partners that operate small clouds and can attest to their operations being subject to privacy laws and governance structures within the nation in which they operate.

    Public cloud heavyweights AWS, Azure, Google, Oracle, IBM, and Alibaba also offer VMware-powered clouds, at hyperscale. But some organizations worry that their US or Chinese roots make them vulnerable to laws that might allow Washington or Beijing to exercise extraterritorial oversight.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022