Oh no, you're thinking, yet another cookie pop-up. Well, sorry, it's the law. We measure how many people read us, and ensure you see relevant ads, by storing cookies on your device. If you're cool with that, hit “Accept all Cookies”. For more info and to customize your settings, hit “Customize Settings”.

Review and manage your consent

Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them. You can also change your choices at any time, by hitting the “Your Consent Options” link on the site's footer.

Manage Cookie Preferences
  • These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features. Without these cookies we cannot provide you with the service that you expect.

  • These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. They perform functions like preventing the same ad from continuously reappearing, ensuring that ads are properly displayed for advertisers, and in some cases selecting advertisements that are based on your interests.

  • These cookies collect information in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used. They allow us to count visits and traffic sources so that we can measure and improve the performance of our sites. If people say no to these cookies, we do not know how many people have visited and we cannot monitor performance.

See also our Cookie policy and Privacy policy.

This article is more than 1 year old

Pandora ordered to pay up extra royalties in BMI row

Streamers will have to fork over more cash to publishers

Pandora has lost a legal decision that will see the company fork out more money to performing rights clearing house group BMI to pay for its content.

A court in New York found the streaming music giant to be liable for additional royalties, bumping the fees it owes to BMI up from 1.7 per cent to 2.5 per cent of revenues. The ruling is expected to have a deleterious effect on the amount of money Pandora will sink into paying off the publishers who provide its songs.

Pandora said it planned for the ruling and will be able to take the financial hit. Still, the streamer says it will be appealing the ruling.

"We remain confident in our legal position. We disagree with the Court’s ruling and will appeal to the same court that ruled in Pandora's favor in the ASCAP case last week," a spokesperson told El Reg.

"We strongly believe the benchmarks cited by the court do not provide an appropriate competitive foundation for a market rate."

Pandora added that it currently shells out 50 per cent more money to song publishers than over-the-air radio broadcasters. But there's a world of difference in the business models between the two types of service.

Royalty fees have long been an issue of contention between Pandora and song publishers. Pandora argues that it already pays a hefty fee for the songs it offers customers, while record labels and musicians have charged Pandora with trying to short-change musicians.

Earlier this month, Pandora was given approval to acquire a radio station in South Dakota, a move that could allow Pandora to challenge its status as an internet music service rather than a radio station operator, the latter of which carries lower music royalty fees. ®

 

Similar topics

TIP US OFF

Send us news


Other stories you might like