Oh no, you're thinking, yet another cookie pop-up. Well, sorry, it's the law. We measure how many people read us, and ensure you see relevant ads, by storing cookies on your device. If you're cool with that, hit “Accept all Cookies”. For more info and to customize your settings, hit “Customize Settings”.

Review and manage your consent

Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them. You can also change your choices at any time, by hitting the “Your Consent Options” link on the site's footer.

Manage Cookie Preferences
  • These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features. Without these cookies we cannot provide you with the service that you expect.

  • These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. They perform functions like preventing the same ad from continuously reappearing, ensuring that ads are properly displayed for advertisers, and in some cases selecting advertisements that are based on your interests.

  • These cookies collect information in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used. They allow us to count visits and traffic sources so that we can measure and improve the performance of our sites. If people say no to these cookies, we do not know how many people have visited and we cannot monitor performance.

See also our Cookie policy and Privacy policy.

This article is more than 1 year old

Putin's lapdog? Zuckerberg questioned over quisling claims

Zuck denies censorship – it's just a policy content issue

Facebook chief Mark Zuckerberg has publicly denied that he is Vladimir Putin's stooge, after Ukrainian Facebookers complained about posts and accounts being deleted, even though they didn't break the site's rules (according to them, at least).

After President Petro Poroshenko joined in with calls for a separate Ukrainian Facebook workspace – believing that a Russian Facebook office was responsible for the perceived censorship – Zuck waded into the debate personally.

In a live-streamed Townhall Q&A with the Facebook founder, Ukraine topped the agenda, with the appeal to create a Ukrainian Facebook office garnering a large number of likes.

The CEO announced that he "did some research" in expectation that Ukrainian issues would be raised, to "make sure he had the right answer" for complainants.

Addressing the content removals and accusations of politically motivated moderation, Zuck noted that his advertising machine doesn't "allow content that is overtly hateful, contains ethnic slurs, or incites violence. There were a few posts that tripped that rule, and I think we did the right thing according to our policies by taking down that content".

Then he accused the Ukrainians of propagating the meme (Zuck's word) that Ukrainian Facebook content was controlled from a Russian office by Putin stooges. Zuck remained adamant that there is no Russian Facebook office. Ukrainian content is actually reviewed in Dublin.

Responding directly to requests for a Ukrainian outpost, the Facebook chief said:

Are we willing to put an office in Ukraine? Over time, it's something we might consider. There are advantages to people working for Facebook not spread out around the world, but in a smaller number of offices.

It makes sense to have local teams for sales, marketing, but for engineering and things like that it makes sense to centralise.

But as we look to expand over time, we will, of course, consider all of these countries.

Having casually strolled into the conflict between India and Pakistan, Zuck celebrated his 31st birthday yesterday. ®

 

Similar topics

TIP US OFF

Send us news


Other stories you might like