Apple GOBBLE: GPS startup Coherent may make Maps somewhat more so

Execs go to Cupertino, possibly using an atlas to get there


Apple is making efforts to improve its locationware by acquiring Coherent Navigation, a startup developing a "high-precision navigation service" using GPS.

Founded in 2008, Coherent Navigation had been developing commercial navigation services, based on partnerships with companies such as Boeing and Iridium, which it intended would outperform consumer-grade navigation systems.

The New York Times reports that the company has "worked on autonomous navigation and robotics projects, according to previous company job listings, as well as projects for the Defense Department."

Apple has made a number of acquisitions in recent years as it attempts to curb its dependence upon competitor Google's mapping.

In response to rumours suggesting the acquisition on Sunday, the fruity folk's PR machine rolled into action, providing the press with its standard non-confirmation comment: "Apple buys smaller technology companies from time to time, and we generally do not discuss our purpose or plans."

No other details regarding the acquisition have been made public.

The deal also sees Coherent Navigation's executives transported to Cupertino. As LinkedIn-scanning hacks at Macrumours report, CEO Paul Lego, along with the co-founders William Bencze and Brett Ledvina, are all now displaying their employment with Apple on the social network for suits.

Apple is still being linked with Nokia's HERE, although may face competition from ride-sharers Uber as the map wars continue. ®

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Venezuelan cardiologist charged with designing and selling ransomware
    If his surgery was as bad as his opsec, this chap has caused a lot of trouble

    The US Attorney’s Office has charged a 55-year-old cardiologist with creating and selling ransomware and profiting from revenue-share agreements with criminals who deployed his product.

    A complaint [PDF] filed on May 16th in the US District Court, Eastern District of New York, alleges that Moises Luis Zagala Gonzalez – aka “Nosophoros,” “Aesculapius” and “Nebuchadnezzar” – created a ransomware builder known as “Thanos”, and ransomware named “Jigsaw v. 2”.

    The self-taught coder and qualified cardiologist advertised the ransomware in dark corners of the web, then licensed it ransomware to crooks for either $500 or $800 a month. He also ran an affiliate network that offered the chance to run Thanos to build custom ransomware, in return for a share of profits.

    Continue reading
  • China reveals its top five sources of online fraud
    'Brushing' tops the list, as quantity of forbidden content continue to rise

    China’s Ministry of Public Security has revealed the five most prevalent types of fraud perpetrated online or by phone.

    The e-commerce scam known as “brushing” topped the list and accounted for around a third of all internet fraud activity in China. Brushing sees victims lured into making payment for goods that may not be delivered, or are only delivered after buyers are asked to perform several other online tasks that may include downloading dodgy apps and/or establishing e-commerce profiles. Victims can find themselves being asked to pay more than the original price for goods, or denied promised rebates.

    Brushing has also seen e-commerce providers send victims small items they never ordered, using profiles victims did not create or control. Dodgy vendors use that tactic to then write themselves glowing product reviews that increase their visibility on marketplace platforms.

    Continue reading
  • Oracle really does owe HPE $3b after Supreme Court snub
    Appeal petition as doomed as the Itanic chips at the heart of decade-long drama

    The US Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear Oracle's appeal to overturn a ruling ordering the IT giant to pay $3 billion in damages for violating a decades-old contract agreement.

    In June 2011, back when HPE had not yet split from HP, the biz sued Oracle for refusing to add Itanium support to its database software. HP alleged Big Red had violated a contract agreement by not doing so, though Oracle claimed it explicitly refused requests to support Intel's Itanium processors at the time.

    A lengthy legal battle ensued. Oracle was ordered to cough up $3 billion in damages in a jury trial, and appealed the decision all the way to the highest judges in America. Now, the Supreme Court has declined its petition.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022