Oh no, you're thinking, yet another cookie pop-up. Well, sorry, it's the law. We measure how many people read us, and ensure you see relevant ads, by storing cookies on your device. If you're cool with that, hit “Accept all Cookies”. For more info and to customize your settings, hit “Customize Settings”.

Review and manage your consent

Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them. You can also change your choices at any time, by hitting the “Your Consent Options” link on the site's footer.

Manage Cookie Preferences
  • These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features. Without these cookies we cannot provide you with the service that you expect.

  • These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. They perform functions like preventing the same ad from continuously reappearing, ensuring that ads are properly displayed for advertisers, and in some cases selecting advertisements that are based on your interests.

  • These cookies collect information in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used. They allow us to count visits and traffic sources so that we can measure and improve the performance of our sites. If people say no to these cookies, we do not know how many people have visited and we cannot monitor performance.

See also our Cookie policy and Privacy policy.

This article is more than 1 year old

Au gummint, opposition: site blocks just FINE

There's too much of that pesky Internet, anyway

The Australian government has resisted calls to limit its agencies' ability to demand that telcos and ISPs block Websites it reckons are committing crimes. Rather, the government, with opposition support, wants blocking “guidelines” to be written at some point.

The government initiated an inquiry into the use of “section 313” notices after the hapless Australian Securities and Investment Commission owned up to blocking thousands of innocent Web servers as collateral damage to shut down a couple of fraud operations.

Under a Section 313 notice, telcos and ISPs have to comply with a request to help prevent a crime.

The inquiry was instituted in light of fears that the notices were being over-used and badly-used. Its conclusion? That there aren't enough sites being blocked.

The use of Section 313 notices should, the agency recommends, be subject to all-of-government guidelines, and says agencies need “the requisite level of technical expertise”, and follow “established procedures for drawing on the expertise of other agencies”.

The Register can only hope that nobody considers ASIC's “established procedures” to request site blocks.

Committee chair Jane Prentice cited Telstra's statement, that it had prevented 84,000 Australians from accessing child abuse Websites, as evidence the block was needed.

(Vulture South would counter that such content is already illegal in Australia and can be blocked industry-wide under the ACMA-administered site blocking scheme.)

The report, unironically entitled Balancing Freedom and Protection, is here. ®

 

Similar topics

Similar topics

Similar topics

TIP US OFF

Send us news


Other stories you might like