New US bill aims to zap patent trolls with transparency demands

VC club prez complains he doesn't wanna go back under his bridge


The US Senate Judiciary Committee has recommended that the "Protecting American Talent and Entrepreneurship Act 6 of 2015" be accepted.

The committee voted 16-4 in favour of the bill (Patent bill S.1137, PDF), which aims to reduce patent trolling and, it is said, uncover who is taking an action and why.

The bill stipulates that claims must detail not just which patents are being infringed, but how. This removes the opportunity to file vague claims in the hope that the company being sued will pay the troll to go away. Giving specific details opens the way for defendants to debunk claims.

If passed into law, the bill also delays the expensive process of discovery until prosecution has progressed, so that those being sued don’t have to get embroiled in expensive research before deciding what to do.

Under the bill, claimants cannot hide behind shell companies set up for trolling because all parties who stand to gain from the action must be listed in it. If the action fails, there could be recourse to those companies for costs. The act stipulates a higher burden of costs on claimants and looks at the history of similar claims from the claimant and associated companies.

It also aims to protect customers of those companies being sued. One tactic trolls use is to go after manufacturers or even end users of disputed technology. Under the new act they could not be approached if the supplier is also involved in federal court litigation.

The US National Venture Capital Association has reacted strongly, opposing the act by claiming that it damages startups. Bobby Franklin, president and CEO of the NVCA, said: “We remain concerned that the changes to the patent litigation system being proposed will make it harder for any patent-reliant startup to defend its intellectual property, and must be moderated to avoid the unintended consequences that will impact investment in innovation and entrepreneurship.”

It’s good to know that his loyalty is to small startups and not to venture capitalists who are taking a bath as the result of backing patent trolls which have failed in their actions. ®


Other stories you might like

  • India reveals home-grown server that won't worry the leading edge

    And a National Blockchain Strategy that calls for gov to host BaaS

    India's government has revealed a home-grown server design that is unlikely to threaten the pacesetters of high tech, but (it hopes) will attract domestic buyers and manufacturers and help to kickstart the nation's hardware industry.

    The "Rudra" design is a two-socket server that can run Intel's Cascade Lake Xeons. The machines are offered in 1U or 2U form factors, each at half-width. A pair of GPUs can be equipped, as can DDR4 RAM.

    Cascade Lake emerged in 2019 and has since been superseded by the Ice Lake architecture launched in April 2021. Indian authorities know Rudra is off the pace, and said a new design capable of supporting four GPUs is already in the works with a reveal planned for June 2022.

    Continue reading
  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021