Net neutrality? Meh. But don't you dare slow my video streaming

EU study finds hifalutin language interests folk less than practical effects

Advisors to the European Commission have found that consumers do grasp the principles of net neutrality and make choices based on it — even when they don’t really know how traffic management, which is key to net neutrality, works.

“Attributes of an internet access service offer that relate to traffic management and net neutrality play a significant role in consumers’ purchase choice decisions," according to BEREC, the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications.

BEREC bases this assertion on a study it carried out in Croatia, the Czech Republic, Greece and Sweden.

Respondents were asked to choose between pairs of hypothetical internet access service offers with varying combinations of price, speed and traffic management.

Five of the ten attributes employed were concerned with traffic management and net neutrality.

BEREC said its descriptions included “brief, clear, effects-based explanations” of the end-users’ experience such as “slowed-down video streaming” or “prioritised VoIP”.

“This suggests that clear, transparent and effects-based information can be effective in helping users to take traffic management practices into account when choosing an internet access service," it said.

"It's encouraging that, in the research, it did not prove necessary for consumers to have been educated about the technical nature and operation of traffic management to be able to take account of relevant ISP practices in choosing a service provider," added the report.

A majority of respondents – between 70-86 per cent – agreed with the statement: “If my internet provider decreased the speed for video streaming unless I paid extra, I would switch provider.”

Indeed, video-streaming was one of the most significant factors in the responses.

Zero-rating, where consumers are able to access certain content, services or applications without it counting towards any monthly data caps, was seen as most desirable for video services – particularly when coupled with a low data cap.

The report shows that it has “limited effect” when teamed with a 50GB cap.

Between 60-80 per cent of respondents were happy for ISPs to manage data traffic in order to keep their net experience stable, but slightly fewer, 50-70 per cent, were happy for applications to be prioritised for users who pay extra for this type of service. ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021