Corrective lenses needed for Gartner's flashy array vision

Dell and HDS missing from excessively proscriptive market snapshot

Comment Gartner's gnomes gnosticated on all flash array sales (AFA) and revenues recently. Dell did not appear at all in its charts or revenue numbers and neither did HDS, leading us to suppose Dell revenues were lower than any of the eight AFA vendors mentioned. Yes, really.

What's happened is a consequence of Gartner's requirements for AFA vendor inclusion. These say that a vendor's AFA product should not have the capability of having disk storage as well.

It must not be a hybrid array or be upgradable to a hybrid array within its product category. Any hybrid array sold configured just with flash does not qualify for inclusion in Gartner's somewhat arbitrary AFA definition.

Its AFA MQ effectively requires a vendor to have a separate AFA product identifier and order number – the SKU (Stock Keeping Unit). HP illustrates one distorting effect of this.

It has announced the 3PAR StoreServ 20800 products. The 20850 is the all-flash array while the 20800 is the same enclosure – virtually the same array, in fact – with both flash drives and disk drives available. HP calls it a converged array and it uses the same SSDs as the 20850 – but if you buy an all-flash 20800, Gartner wouldn't count it as an AFA, whereas a 20850 with the same SSDs, controller, software, power supplies, etc, would count. HP is adept at playing the Gartner MQ game.

Both Dell and HDS, like HP, have produced all-flash array versions of their existing VSP and Storage Centre (SC) arrays, but have not turned them into logically (using Gartner MQ logic) separate product lines with their own SKUs and artificial prevention of an upgrade with disks.

Neither supplier appears in Gartner's AFA MQ and reports. How bizarre. Although NetApp appears in the MQ dcument, we understand it is only for its EF-series of all-flash systems, not the all-flash FAS systems which can have disk as well. So NetApp's all-flash array sales are under-reported in that sense,

Any document purporting to assess the all-flash array market, while excluding Dell and HDS AFAs and all-flash FAS arrays from NetApp, obviously has its own internal logic. However, its use as a general guide to the AFA market should be verboten.

We would not be surprised if the Gartner AFA vendor rankings – supposing they did include all all-flash arrays – showed Dell and HDS selling $100m or more each in 2014, with NetApp selling more again.

In fact, Dell says it outsold Kaminario, Nimble, Violin, Nimbus, SolidFire and Pure Storage combined in 2014, which would rank it second only to EMC.

It's not just El Reg that feels this way about the distorting effect of the Gartner AFA MQ – commentators like Howard Marks think Gartner's AFA reporting is skewed as well:

These [Gartner AFA] criteria mean that EMC VNX-F qualifies as an all-flash array, while the all-flash versions of NetApp’s flagship FAS don't, even though the VNX-F and all-flash FAS are as directly competitive, and comparable, as any two storage systems on the market...

Who the heck – and those of you who know me know that heck was not my first choice of words – is Gartner to tell vendors they have to name their products in a specific way, and worse, that they must reduce the flexibility they offer their customers?

Come on Gartner; 'fess up. You got it wrong and are doing people a disservice. ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • Governments opt for XaaS, dump datacenters in droves
    Outsource all the things! To whom? The lowest bidder of course, says Gartner

    The world's governments are eager to let someone else handle their IT headaches, according to a recent Gartner report, which found a healthy appetite for "anything-as-a-service" (XaaS) platforms to cut the costs of bureaucracy.

    These trends will push government IT spending to $565 billion in 2022, up 5 percent from last year, the analyst house claims. Gartner believes the majority of new government IT investments will be on service platforms by 2026.

    "The pandemic sped up public-sector adoption of cloud solutions and the XaaS model for accelerated legacy modernization and new service implementations," Gartner analyst Daniel Snyder said in a release. "Fifty-four percent of government CIOs responding to the 2022 Gartner CIO survey indicated that they expect to allocate additional funding to cloud platforms in 2022, while 35 percent will decrease investments in legacy infrastructure and datacenter technologies."

    Continue reading
  • Renegotiating a Salesforce software agreement? It could take up to two years
    Salesforce complexity can be 'difficult and expensive to govern', especially for multicloud, warns Gartner

    The set of enterprise technologies acquired by Salesforce in recent years, together with its own applications, have proved "more difficult and expensive to govern than expected for many customers," says Gartner.

    The global tech analyst offered a balanced view of the SaaS company in a research report, saying Salesforce was "strong" in both its strategy and corporate viability. However, its overall rating had fallen from "strong" to "positive".

    For context, Gartner offers a five step rating, with the first three being "weak", "caution" and "variable." Salesforce's rating for products and services also slid, dropping from "strong" to "positive."

    Continue reading
  • Oracle contracts and pricing a 'challenge', says Gartner
    While heaping praise on Big Red, analysts find room to criticize licensing, negotiations, and integration

    Oracle's pricing models and contracts can be "challenging to navigate" and "frustrating for customers," according to a Gartner report that otherwise heaps praise on the omnipresent enterprise software company.

    The global analyst has published its vendor rating report on Big Red, judging the Larry Ellison-founded company to have a broad and competitive technology portfolio, a vertically integrated and mostly self-developed platform, and a proven track record in revenue retention, growth, and profitability.

    But elsewhere Gartner found cause for concern. "Oracle's pricing models and contracts can be challenging to navigate, which, coupled to Oracle's focus on increasing cloud product revenue, can be frustrating for customers who wish to only maintain their existing on-premises commitments," the report said.

    Continue reading
  • Mobile-based ID wallets for government are coming
    Among top 10 government tech trends, claims Gartner

    Gartner's latest set of public sector technology trends predicts, among other things, that a third of national governments (and half of US states) will have mobile-based identity wallets on offer by 2024.

    Many of its other findings will come as no surprise for the enterprise technology world: cut down on the siloed quick-fixes and focus instead a modularity and integration.

    Gartner reckons the 10 trends to look out for include "Anything as a Service" (XaaS), with 95 per cent of new IT investments being made in XaaS over the next three years.

    Continue reading
  • Party on Semiconductor Street as worldwide 2021 revenues top record half a trillion dollars
    Gartner reports 25.1% growth off the back of supply chain pain

    Semiconductor giants enjoyed soaring revenues in 2021 as global sales topped the half-trillion-dollar mark for the first time against a backdrop of squeezed supply chains.

    Preliminary numbers by tech analyst Gartner put revenues at $583.5bn for 2021, a jump of 25.1 per cent on the previous year with demand and raw material costs pushing up average selling prices (ASPs).

    There was also change at the top as Intel's crown was snatched back by Samsung. The US chipmaker's revenues were almost static, growing by a mere half a per cent (the lowest among the top 25 vendors) to $73.1bn. Sammy, on the other hand, leapt by 31.6 per cent to $75.95bn.

    Continue reading
  • Gartner Gartner on the wall, which is the hypest cycle of them all?
    Omnipresent analyst house returns to the source

    Comment It always comes around sooner than you think. With a large slice of fantasy, cultural mythology, and suspension of disbelief, it's time to get out the tinsel and celebrate the arrival of this year's Gartner hype cycle.

    Officially the "Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies, 2021", the research documents trends the tech industry would like to talk about, even if few emerge fully formed into anything we would understand as the real world.

    Top of the gift list this year are nonfungible tokens (NFT), sovereign cloud, data fabric, generative AI, and composable networks, all supposedly arriving to help beat the competition in some way or other, the omnipresent analyst organisation said.

    Continue reading
  • Where on Gartner's Hype Cycle is Gartner's Hype Cycle?
    That's the way uh-huh uh-huh, I hype it

    Column Gartner is an odd fish. A very big odd fish, making some $4bn a year out of its 16,000 souls beavering away in its shiny belly. It acts as soothsayer to the troubled monarchs of industry and whichever of their courtiers can afford a subscription to its reports.

    The company has an admirably sustainable business model that comes close to the fabled circular supply chain. It gets its raw material from confidential conversations with its paying clients, mixes that data up in its giant cauldron of proprietary analytics, and then sells it back to them and their peers. Rinse and repeat. It has considerable influence on the market with its Magic Quadrants of who's in and who's out, and as these people tend to be those clients again, we have to take it on trust that no undue influence comes attached to large cheques. Which, of course, we do.

    But what if sceptical types want to check? Gartner has branched out from its initial IT focus to providing research and advice to all aspects of business – customer care, legal, HR, you name it. Perhaps we can use some analytics of our own to judge the priorities it offers. The words "strategy" and "strategic" occur nearly 200,000 times on its website; "ethics" just 3,600. But that's an unfair comparison as most of the latter references are to "data ethics"; the other sort, the ones at the core of your company, score just 460 – that's a 438:1 ratio, the square root of strategy.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022