What is this river nonsense? Give .amazon to Bezos, says US Congress

US government tells ICANN to ignore government attempts at influence. Um…


The US Congress has had a second stab at trying to get Amazon its own internet extension in a letter to the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN).

The Congressional Trademark Caucus has written to the domain name overseer's CEO and chair complaining about the decision to deny the online retailer its namesake top-level domain: dot-amazon.

The letter [PDF] even holds the transition of the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) contract over ICANN's head - a process that Congress will soon have final say over.

"At this critical stage in which the United States Government prepares to transition stewardship of the IANA functions, we believe it is incumbent upon ICANN to resolve this issue," the letter, eschewing any effort at subtlety.

Demonstrating the self-awareness that the Congress have become famous for, the letter castigates ICANN for falling under the influence of governments who only push arguments for their own self-interest.

"Neither Brazil nor Peru has any legally recognized rights - let alone intellectual property rights - in the term 'Amazon' and there is no basis in international law for either country to assert rights in the term 'Amazon'," it argues.

This letter follows an earlier one a week ago [PDF] from 11 members of Congress, many of whom sit on the committee that oversees the internet, and hence IANA and ICANN, in which it complains about government interference and the decision by the Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) of ICANN to reject Amazon's application "without any legal basis".

"The ICANN Board succumbed to political pressure from several governments," it complains bitterly, before again trying to leverage the IANA contract to make ICANN succumb to political pressure.

"As the plans for the IANA transition develop, it is critical ICANN's rules and policies not be subverted by government interference," it notes with not a touch of irony.

What's the deal?

The subject of the application for '.amazon' by US online retailer Amazon is an intriguing one that cuts along multiple lines of power.

While the rules for massively expanding the number of internet extensions were being developed, the world's governments were very vocal about being given the right to veto any applications that they didn't approve of.

While this was taken by some as undue government interference, in reality what happened was that the governments used their significant expertise in public policy matters to develop a "score card" of concerns that ended up filing a number of significant holes in ICANN's policies.

Broadly, the compromise reached was that if the GAC as a whole disapproved of a particular name then ICANN would be obliged to ban it. For the GAC to reach a consensus on something is not easy (these are the world's governments, after all) but if there are one or two members that feel very strongly about something and no one is that bothered, it can become a consensus position.

Banned

This is what happened with a number of applications. They included: '.wine' and '.vin' which the French and Italian governments were very unhappy about but recently reached a compromise; '.islam' and '.halal' which have been put on a sort of indefinite hold; '.guangzhou' and '.shenzhen' which the Chinese government objected to and the applicants simply withdrew; and two Amazon applications (among a number of others: .thai, .ram…)

One of Amazon's applications objected to was for '.yun' - roughly Chinese for "cloud" - which the Chinese government had a problem with, prompting Amazon to withdraw and leaving it in the hands of Chinese company Qihoo 360.

And then of course '.amazon' - as well as both Japanese and Chinese language equivalents of the name.

Amazon passed all of ICANN's criteria for '.amazon' and the application appeared approved when a number of South American governments - particularly the Brazilian government - suddenly started making noises about it.

On 18 July 2013, at ICANN's Durban meeting, '.amazon' went from approved to formally disapproved by the GAC.

Many felt it was not entirely a coincidence that just two weeks earlier, documents supplied by Edward Snowden revealed that the NSA had spied extensively on Brazilian citizens and on the Brazilian president herself, tapping her phone.

Dilma Rousseff would later lambast the United States in a speech at the United Nations but the first signs of Brazilian fury were felt at the ICANN meeting in Durban. Despite determined diplomatic efforts by Amazon's representatives, the Brazilian government was not to be moved and the ban on '.amazon' was reaffirmed in November 2013.

The US government meanwhile, having said previously that it would remain neutral in any decisions that it did not actively disapprove of, did not object to the Brazilian government's stance and so it became a matter of formal GAC advice to the ICANN Board.

The ICANN Board didn't much like it but duly resolved that the '.amazon' application should not go forward while noting that Amazon was still in discussions with the South American governments.

By adopting the GAC advice, the NGPC notes that the decision is without prejudice to the continuing efforts by Amazon and members of the GAC to pursue dialogue on the relevant issues.

So who has a case?

The issue of whether Amazon, the corporation, has a case is up for debate.

Strictly speaking, the Brazilian and Peruvian governments do not have rights over the name "Amazon" even though it is the world's longest and possibly most famous river and it runs through their territories.

But at the same time, ICANN did create rules that would allow governments to object to particular applications, and that happened in this case. It is official GAC advice that the bid for '.amazon' not proceed. And that also happened with a number of other applications that governments also have no real rights over.

The difference is that while the other affected applications decided to simply walk away, Amazon's representatives were infuriated by what they say as being caught up in a purely political play over NSA spying and decided to keep fighting.

It's worth bearing in mind that it's not as if there is a burgeoning online community built up around the Amazon river. And of course Amazon the retailer was the only one that applied for the '.amazon' name.

The ICANN Board is allowed to reject GAC advice but it needs to provide a strong rationale for doing so. As such, the ICANN Board has to weigh up whether to annoy Amazon the corporation (which also multiple contracts now with ICANN to run other top-level domains) as well as annoy the US Congress at a critical time; or risk upsetting the Brazilian government and many other members of its governmental advisory committee by caving in to US government pressure.

In other words, it is caught between a rock and a hard place. Typically in these situations, ICANN makes the wrong decision. As to what that wrong decision is, well, who knows?

Narrower topics


Other stories you might like

  • NASA's InSight doomed as Mars dust coats solar panels
    The little lander that couldn't (any longer)

    The Martian InSight lander will no longer be able to function within months as dust continues to pile up on its solar panels, starving it of energy, NASA reported on Tuesday.

    Launched from Earth in 2018, the six-metre-wide machine's mission was sent to study the Red Planet below its surface. InSight is armed with a range of instruments, including a robotic arm, seismometer, and a soil temperature sensor. Astronomers figured the data would help them understand how the rocky cores of planets in the Solar System formed and evolved over time.

    "InSight has transformed our understanding of the interiors of rocky planets and set the stage for future missions," Lori Glaze, director of NASA's Planetary Science Division, said in a statement. "We can apply what we've learned about Mars' inner structure to Earth, the Moon, Venus, and even rocky planets in other solar systems."

    Continue reading
  • The ‘substantial contributions’ Intel has promised to boost RISC-V adoption
    With the benefit of maybe revitalizing the x86 giant’s foundry business

    Analysis Here's something that would have seemed outlandish only a few years ago: to help fuel Intel's future growth, the x86 giant has vowed to do what it can to make the open-source RISC-V ISA worthy of widespread adoption.

    In a presentation, an Intel representative shared some details of how the chipmaker plans to contribute to RISC-V as part of its bet that the instruction set architecture will fuel growth for its revitalized contract chip manufacturing business.

    While Intel invested in RISC-V chip designer SiFive in 2018, the semiconductor titan's intentions with RISC-V evolved last year when it revealed that the contract manufacturing business key to its comeback, Intel Foundry Services, would be willing to make chips compatible with x86, Arm, and RISC-V ISAs. The chipmaker then announced in February it joined RISC-V International, the ISA's governing body, and launched a $1 billion innovation fund that will support chip designers, including those making RISC-V components.

    Continue reading
  • FBI warns of North Korean cyberspies posing as foreign IT workers
    Looking for tech talent? Kim Jong-un's friendly freelancers, at your service

    Pay close attention to that resume before offering that work contract.

    The FBI, in a joint advisory with the US government Departments of State and Treasury, has warned that North Korea's cyberspies are posing as non-North-Korean IT workers to bag Western jobs to advance Kim Jong-un's nefarious pursuits.

    In guidance [PDF] issued this week, the Feds warned that these techies often use fake IDs and other documents to pose as non-North-Korean nationals to gain freelance employment in North America, Europe, and east Asia. Additionally, North Korean IT workers may accept foreign contracts and then outsource those projects to non-North-Korean folks.

    Continue reading
  • Google opens the pod doors on Bay View campus
    A futuristic design won't make people want to come back – just ask Apple

    After nearly a decade of planning and five years of construction, Google is cutting the ribbon on its Bay View campus, the first that Google itself designed.

    The Bay View campus in Mountain View – slated to open this week – consists of two office buildings (one of which, Charleston East, is still under construction), 20 acres of open space, a 1,000-person event center and 240 short-term accommodations for Google employees. The search giant said the buildings at Bay View total 1.1 million square feet. For reference, that's less than half the size of Apple's spaceship. 

    The roofs on the two main buildings, which look like pavilions roofed in sails, were designed that way for a purpose: They're a network of 90,000 scale-like solar panels nicknamed "dragonscales" for their layout and shimmer. By scaling the tiles, Google said the design minimises damage from wind, rain and snow, and the sloped pavilion-like roof improves solar capture by adding additional curves in the roof. 

    Continue reading
  • Pentester pops open Tesla Model 3 using low-cost Bluetooth module
    Anything that uses proximity-based BLE is vulnerable, claim researchers

    Tesla Model 3 and Y owners, beware: the passive entry feature on your vehicle could potentially be hoodwinked by a relay attack, leading to the theft of the flash motor.

    Discovered and demonstrated by researchers at NCC Group, the technique involves relaying the Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) signals from a smartphone that has been paired with a Tesla back to the vehicle. Far from simply unlocking the door, this hack lets a miscreant start the car and drive away, too.

    Essentially, what happens is this: the paired smartphone should be physically close by the Tesla to unlock it. NCC's technique involves one gadget near the paired phone, and another gadget near the car. The phone-side gadget relays signals from the phone to the car-side gadget, which forwards them to the vehicle to unlock and start it. This shouldn't normally happen because the phone and car are so far apart. The car has a defense mechanism – based on measuring transmission latency to detect that a paired device is too far away – that ideally prevents relayed signals from working, though this can be defeated by simply cutting the latency of the relay process.

    Continue reading
  • Google assuring open-source code to secure software supply chains
    Java and Python packages are the first on the list

    Google has a plan — and a new product plus a partnership with developer-focused security shop Snyk — that attempts to make it easier for enterprises to secure their open source software dependencies.

    The new service, announced today at the Google Cloud Security Summit, is called Assured Open Source Software. We're told it will initially focus on some Java and Python packages that Google's own developers prioritize in their workflows. 

    These two programming languages have "particularly high-risk profiles," Google Cloud Cloud VP and GM Sunil Potti said in response to The Register's questions. "Remember Log4j?" Yes, quite vividly.

    Continue reading
  • Rocket Lab is taking NASA's CAPSTONE to the Moon
    Mission to lunar orbit is further than any Photon satellite bus has gone before

    Rocket Lab has taken delivery of NASA's CAPSTONE spacecraft at its New Zealand launch pad ahead of a mission to the Moon.

    It's been quite a journey for CAPSTONE [Cislunar Autonomous Positioning System Technology Operations and Navigation Experiment], which was originally supposed to launch from Rocket Lab's US launchpad at Wallops Island in Virginia.

    The pad, Launch Complex 2, has been completed for a while now. However, delays in certifying Rocket Lab's Autonomous Flight Termination System (AFTS) pushed the move to Launch Complex 1 in Mahia, New Zealand.

    Continue reading
  • Alibaba Cloud adds third datacenter in Germany
    More Euro-presence than any other Chinese company, but still nowhere near Google or AWS

    Alibaba has pulled ahead of its Chinese rivals in Europe with the opening of a third datacenter in Germany.

    The company said the Frankfurt datacenter serves cloud computing products to Europe and "adheres to the highest security standards and the strict compliance regulations set out in the Cloud Computing Compliance Controls Catalog (C5) in Germany."

    The addition brings Alibaba Cloud to a network of 84 availability zones in 27 regions worldwide. The company's first European cloud center arrived in Frankfurt in 2016.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022