Security world chuckles at Hacking Team’s 'virus torrent' squeals

Pull the other one, security pros implore eggfaced biz

Controversial spyware maker Hacking Team claims a torrent purporting to contain source code and other documents stolen from its systems is riddled with a "virus" – a claim laughed at by independent security experts in the industry.

Some 400GB of Hacking Team's internal emails, source code, and other files were published via BitTorrent early on Monday morning. The Italian firm’s Twitter feed was also hijacked as part of the comprehensive pwnage, as previously reported on The Register.

The torrent file reportedly also includes login credentials and passwords for their support site for Egypt, Mexico and Turkey.

Nobody has yet claimed credit for the hack.

Hacking Team's Christian Pozzi claims the leak of sensitive internal material contains a virus, a statement security experts are treating as an attempt at damage limitation.

“No, the torrent contains all of your viruses, which you sell, and which will get patched,” said John Adams, an ex-operations and security worker at Twitter, in an update that’s typical of the general industry response to the breach.

Pozzi denied selling malware, describing its wares as “custom software solutions” before his account was also seized.

Hacking Team re-established control of its Twitter account late on Monday morning. Its main site appeared to be having problems at the time of writing.

Hacking Team sells its Da Vinci malware/surveillanceware to law enforcement and governments. Critics argue that the kit is used by countries with patchy human rights records to spy on activists and journalists.

Analysis of the leak is ongoing, with early attention focusing on directory listings for the leak. These imply that the Italian firm’s customers included commercial firms and banks.

Hacking Team is not the first governmental malware contractor to get hacked. Something similar happened to Gamma International (suppliers of FinFisher) last year. Security breaches normally attract some sympathy, but Hacking Team's business means that its problems have provoked a very different response.

“Apparently the Italian equivalent of schadenfreude is gioia maligna,” said security expert Kenn White, on Twitter. ®

Broader topics

Narrower topics

Other stories you might like

  • DigitalOcean tries to take sting out of price hike with $4 VM
    Cloud biz says it is reacting to customer mix largely shifting from lone devs to SMEs

    DigitalOcean attempted to lessen the sting of higher prices this week by announcing a cut-rate instance aimed at developers and hobbyists.

    The $4-a-month droplet — what the infrastructure-as-a-service outfit calls its virtual machines — pairs a single virtual CPU with 512 MB of memory, 10 GB of SSD storage, and 500 GB a month in network bandwidth.

    The launch comes as DigitalOcean plans a sweeping price hike across much of its product portfolio, effective July 1. On the low-end, most instances will see pricing increase between $1 and $16 a month, but on the high-end, some products will see increases of as much as $120 in the case of DigitalOceans’ top-tier storage-optimized virtual machines.

    Continue reading
  • GPL legal battle: Vizio told by judge it will have to answer breach-of-contract claims
    Fine-print crucially deemed contractual agreement as well as copyright license in smartTV source-code case

    The Software Freedom Conservancy (SFC) has won a significant legal victory in its ongoing effort to force Vizio to publish the source code of its SmartCast TV software, which is said to contain GPLv2 and LGPLv2.1 copyleft-licensed components.

    SFC sued Vizio, claiming it was in breach of contract by failing to obey the terms of the GPLv2 and LGPLv2.1 licenses that require source code to be made public when certain conditions are met, and sought declaratory relief on behalf of Vizio TV owners. SFC wanted its breach-of-contract arguments to be heard by the Orange County Superior Court in California, though Vizio kicked the matter up to the district court level in central California where it hoped to avoid the contract issue and defend its corner using just federal copyright law.

    On Friday, Federal District Judge Josephine Staton sided with SFC and granted its motion to send its lawsuit back to superior court. To do so, Judge Staton had to decide whether or not the federal Copyright Act preempted the SFC's breach-of-contract allegations; in the end, she decided it didn't.

    Continue reading
  • US brings first-of-its-kind criminal charges of Bitcoin-based sanctions-busting
    Citizen allegedly moved $10m-plus in BTC into banned nation

    US prosecutors have accused an American citizen of illegally funneling more than $10 million in Bitcoin into an economically sanctioned country.

    It's said the resulting criminal charges of sanctions busting through the use of cryptocurrency are the first of their kind to be brought in the US.

    Under the United States' International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEA), it is illegal for a citizen or institution within the US to transfer funds, directly or indirectly, to a sanctioned country, such as Iran, Cuba, North Korea, or Russia. If there is evidence the IEEA was willfully violated, a criminal case should follow. If an individual or financial exchange was unwittingly involved in evading sanctions, they may be subject to civil action. 

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022