Oh no, you're thinking, yet another cookie pop-up. Well, sorry, it's the law. We measure how many people read us, and ensure you see relevant ads, by storing cookies on your device. If you're cool with that, hit “Accept all Cookies”. For more info and to customize your settings, hit “Customize Settings”.

Review and manage your consent

Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them. You can also change your choices at any time, by hitting the “Your Consent Options” link on the site's footer.

Manage Cookie Preferences
  • These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features. Without these cookies we cannot provide you with the service that you expect.

  • These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. They perform functions like preventing the same ad from continuously reappearing, ensuring that ads are properly displayed for advertisers, and in some cases selecting advertisements that are based on your interests.

  • These cookies collect information in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used. They allow us to count visits and traffic sources so that we can measure and improve the performance of our sites. If people say no to these cookies, we do not know how many people have visited and we cannot monitor performance.

See also our Cookie policy and Privacy policy.

This article is more than 1 year old

Apple spared from paying a day's revenue in patent damages bout

Judge bins jury's award in iTunes software showdown

Apple will not have to cough up the $533m (£347.61m) in damages it was on the hook for after losing a patent infringement battle.

Judge Rodney Gilstrap of the Texas US Eastern District Court said the jury in an iTunes software patent trial was wrong to come up with the nine-digit sum. He said the figure should be reconsidered, and issued a motion throwing out the half-a-billion-dollar award.

Apple was facing the huge bill after its iTunes software infringed patents held by a company called Smartflash. The iPhone maker wasn't happy with that, and demanded a new trial to recalculate the damages. Smartflash had wanted $852m when it dragged Apple into court.

"The court agrees with Apple’s argument that a new trial on damages is necessary," the judge said on Tuesday. He said the figure was not correctly calculated after bad advice was given to the jury back in February.

"The court is persuaded, in the clarity of post-trial hindsight, that such instruction may have created a skewed damages horizon for the jury," Judge Gilstrap explained.

"It is the court’s duty to view any and all proposed instructions critically and with an eye toward accurate compliance with the law, coupled with effective and fair guidance for the jury."

The three "data storage and access" patents Apple infringed are:

They describe "data storage and access systems ... for downloading and paying for data such as audio and video data, text, software, games and other types of data."

A $533m payout is not a crippling financial blow for Apple. The Cupertino idiot-tax operation reeled in $58bn (£378.26bn) of revenues during its latest financial quarter, and has tens of billions in the bank. Still, Apple has said it will challenge the verdict through an appeals court.

Apple did not respond to a request for comment on the decision. The damages retrial is due to start on September 14 in Tyler, Texas, where Smartflash is headquartered. ®

 

Similar topics

TIP US OFF

Send us news


Other stories you might like