Citizenfour director Laura Poitras sues US for years of border security harassment

Snowden's pal SSSSick of getting TSA shakedowns

Filmmaker Laura Poitras, who won an Oscar for the Edward Snowden documentary Citizenfour, is suing the US government to find out why she spent six years being repeatedly harassed by border security guards.

"I'm filing this lawsuit because the government uses the US border to bypass the rule of law," said Poitras. "This simply should not be tolerated in a democracy. I am also filing this suit in support of the countless other less high-profile people who have also been subjected to years of Kafkaesque harassment at the borders. We have a right to know how this system works and why we are targeted."

Between 2006 and 2012 Poitras, who also won the 2014 Pulitzer for Public Service for reporting on the NSA and a MacArthur Foundation "genius" grant, was stopped at the US borders every time she crossed them – more than 50 times in total. Questioning typically took hours, and during it her electronic devices were copied and confiscated, sometimes for over a month.

The reason for the searches was down to Poitras having the dreaded SSSS (Secondary Security Screening Selection) marking added to her boarding pass. The SSSS notation alerts US border guards that the traveler is considered a danger and needs thorough screening before getting on an airplane.

Laura Poitras

Tell me why, I don't like borders

Poitras submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the government to find out why this was going on but has either been stonewalled, ignored, or refused documents explaining quite why she was considered such a dangerous individual by US border security.

"The government used its power to detain people at airports, in the name of national security, to target a journalist whose work has focused on the effects of the U.S. war on terror," said David Sobel, EFF senior counsel.

"In refusing to respond to Poitras' FOIA requests and wrongfully withholding the documents about her that it has located, the government is flouting its responsibility to explain and defend why it subjected a law-abiding citizen – whose work has shone a light on post-9/11 military and intelligence activities – to interrogations and searches every time she entered her country."

On one occasion Poitras was told that the searches were due to her being a convicted felon, despite the fact that she's never been arrested, while another border guard told her that she was on a no-fly list. In one bizarre encounter she was threatened with handcuffs while taking notes about the interview because the pen could be used as a weapon.

Last year Poitras filed FOIA requests with the Department of Homeland Security, FBI, TSA, US Customs and Border Protection, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and others to find out what was going on. She's still waiting for details; most agencies either ignored her requests or sent her a form letter, although the FBI did say that it had six pages of data that are currently being withheld.

"We are suing the government to force it to disclose any records that would show why security officials targeted Poitras for six years, even though she had no criminal record and there was no indication that she posed any security risk," said EFF attorney Jamie Lee Williams.

"By spurning Poitras' FOIA requests, the government leaves the impression that her detentions were a form of retaliation and harassment of a journalist whose work has focused on U.S. policy in the post-9/11 world." ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • Experts: AI should be recognized as inventors in patent law
    Plus: Police release deepfake of murdered teen in cold case, and more

    In-brief Governments around the world should pass intellectual property laws that grant rights to AI systems, two academics at the University of New South Wales in Australia argued.

    Alexandra George, and Toby Walsh, professors of law and AI, respectively, believe failing to recognize machines as inventors could have long-lasting impacts on economies and societies. 

    "If courts and governments decide that AI-made inventions cannot be patented, the implications could be huge," they wrote in a comment article published in Nature. "Funders and businesses would be less incentivized to pursue useful research using AI inventors when a return on their investment could be limited. Society could miss out on the development of worthwhile and life-saving inventions."

    Continue reading
  • Declassified and released: More secret files on US govt's emergency doomsday powers
    Nuke incoming? Quick break out the plans for rationing, censorship, property seizures, and more

    More papers describing the orders and messages the US President can issue in the event of apocalyptic crises, such as a devastating nuclear attack, have been declassified and released for all to see.

    These government files are part of a larger collection of records that discuss the nature, reach, and use of secret Presidential Emergency Action Documents: these are executive orders, announcements, and statements to Congress that are all ready to sign and send out as soon as a doomsday scenario occurs. PEADs are supposed to give America's commander-in-chief immediate extraordinary powers to overcome extraordinary events.

    PEADs have never been declassified or revealed before. They remain hush-hush, and their exact details are not publicly known.

    Continue reading
  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022