W3C's failed Do Not Track crusade tumbles to ad-blockers' Vietnam

Worst outcome ever for clueless online admen

The World Wide Web Consortium’s (W3C) Do Not Track (DNT) proposal, to give users a way to tell web sites not to track them, recently reached its "Last Call" stage.

Last call is what comes just before a standard becomes “recommended”, which is W3C-speak for “done”. Indeed, most browsers have already implemented at least some aspects of the proposed Do Not Track standard.

Unfortunately, the DNT standard and the tools already available in web browsers are useless because, by and large, the advertising industry ignores them.

There are a handful of sites that will respect your DNT settings, should you turn them on. Twitter and Medium are among the biggest sites to do so. But the largely unknown ad networks that load cookies in the background on your favourite sites have, thus far, totally ignored the DNT header.

Despite the seeming clarity built into the name, many advertisers claim they're befuddled by it. Yahoo’s former chief trust officer Anne Toth (now at Slack) once claimed that: "When a consumer puts Do Not Track in the header, we don't know what they mean."

This profound lack of respect for users is a large part of both why the web needs something like DNT and why it has thus far been largely been ignored by the ad industry.

Conceived by Mozilla, DNT has lacked teeth because there's no way to enforce it. Your browser can broadcast the DNT header to websites all it likes, but it's up to the goodwill of the sites to honour it. It's a bit like politely asking the wolf not to eat the sheep.

When Mozilla unveiled DNT in 2011, most users were blissfully unaware of how closely they were being tracked and how much that data could tell advertisers about them.

Thankfully, that’s no longer the case. A Pew Internet survey earlier this year found users care about online privacy. In fact, a whopping 93 per cent of US adults say that being in control of who can get information about them is "important" and 74 per cent go further and call it "very important."

Most publishers, though, have embraced an advertising-based revenue model that works much better – for readers and advertisers – when ads are tailored to users' interests. The only way to tailor to user interest is to discover what those interests are.

This leaves the web at something of an impasse.

Users don't want to be tracked, but neither do they seem willing to pay for content. If there's no revenue, there's no content.

What the web really needs is some magical third way. In lieu of that, DNT could have offered a middle road for the time being. Instead, so far, it has been an abject failure.

Still, it's not users who need to lament the failure of DNT. It's the advertisers – and by extension, publishers – who missed an opportunity. By failing to support DNT, the advertising industry is going to end up getting something with much more far-reaching consequences – ad blockers.

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021