What Ashley Madison did and did NOT delete if you paid $19 – and why it may cost it $5m+

Owner ALM now sued in California as well as Canada


Add a multimillion-dollar US class-action lawsuit to the growing number of court battles facing the owner of the hacked Ashley Madison website.

A class-action complaint [PDF] filed in a US District Court in California this week alleges that Avid Life Media (ALM) neglected to properly secure the highly compromising personal information of its AshleyMadison.com users.

The suit notes that, among other claims, ALM offered a paid option in which people who created a profile could have their account scrubbed from the Tinder-for-adulterers website if they coughed up $19. When the massive data dump of Ashley Madison lust-hunters surfaced, it was found that while information was indeed removed when accounts were deleted, some details remained in the site's databases – and were splashed all over the web by miscreants.

Here's some example records from the leaked database of what appears to be a paid-for deleted account (on the left), and an active one (on the right). The active account user chose to keep some of their details private, such as their name and street address, but still handed over their GPS coordinates and email address.

Table cells in red have been censored by El Reg as they contain potentially identifying information; cells in green were deleted by Ashley Madison:

Deleted account Active account
ID number 271825 143760
Email address deleted@almlabs.com xxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx
Date created '2004-10-22 03:57:35' '2004-02-10 18:11:36'
Created by 0 0
Last updated '2015-03-19 11:04:08' '2015-06-11 10:59:49'
Updated by 0 10
Admin value 2 2
Status value 2 2
Account type 1 1
Membership status NULL NULL
Ad source 3 6
Profile number NULL 143760
Nickname '<271825>' xxxxxx
First name '<paid_delete>' NULL
Last name '<paid_delete>' NULL
Street address '<paid_delete>' ''
Street address '<paid_delete>' ''
City 'York' 'Trenton'
ZIP/Post code '<paid_delete>' xxxxx
State 39 31
Latitude xx.xxxxx xx.xxxxx
Longitude -xx.xxxxxx -xx.xxxxxx
Country code 1 1
Phone number '<paid_delete>' NULL
Work phone number '<paid_delete>' NULL
Mobile phone number '<paid_delete>' NULL
Gender 2 2
Date of birth 'xxxx-xx-xx' 'xxxx-xx-xx'
Profile caption '<paid_delete>' 'Seeking a long term FUN!'
Ethnicity 1 1
Weight xxx xxx
Height xxx xxx
Body type 4 4
Smoker? 1 1
Drinker? 1 1
Initially seeking? 6 5
Relationship status 2 2
Open to flags '|7|37|36|42|44|39|29|18|' '|7|17|18|40|31|48|43|29|30 |19|34|38|36|42|44|'
Open to others flags '<paid_delete>' ''
Abstract '<paid_delete>' 'I am seeking a woman for fun, laughs, dates and to enjoy each other's company. Just want to enjoy life again. Please be a real person, too many fake requests on here.'
Turn ons flags '|30|32|40|44|49|10|52|11|54|14|55|56|60|' '|4|11|12|14|16|18|30|32|48|6|10|56|45|'
Turn ons for others flags '<paid_delete>' ''
Turn ons abstract '<paid_delete>' ''
Looking for flags '||' '|47|50|56|71|75|77|78|80|55|57|67|74|'
Looking for others flags '<paid_delete>' ''
Looking for others abstract '<paid_delete>' 'I would like to meet a woman who likes to laugh, have fun and be happy. If you want to hang out with a smart, funny, sensual man, let's connect.'
Photo NULL NULL
Security question 2 2
Security answer '<paid_delete>' 'xxxxxxxx'

So it appears from the leaked databases that if you paid $19 to delete an account a number of columns in your record would be obliterated by a "<paid_delete>" entry – but, crucially, your GPS coordinates would not be removed, nor would your city, state, country, weight, height, date of birth, whether you smoke and/or like a drink, your gender, your ethnicity, what turns you on, and other bits and pieces.

And if you didn't pay the 19 bucks, everything was eventually leaked online by the website's hackers. According to the databases, just 185,948 accounts were marked as deleted.

Presumably ALM kept these details on file, even if you paid to delete your account, so it could get a picture of how old its users are, where they are from, what sort of person they are, and so on.

"Reportedly, among the 'dumped' data was data of individuals who paid a fee of $19 to have AshleyMadison.com scrub their profiles from the site, but whose profiles had apparently not been scrubbed," the lawsuit in California reads.

"Needless to say, this dumping of sensitive personal and financial information is bound to have catastrophic effects on the lives of the website's users."

Filed on behalf of American users of the site with the backing of an unnamed "John Doe" user from Los Angeles, the complaint would seek to collect unspecified damages 'in excess of $5,000,000' for the John Doe and other members who signed on to be part of the class action.

"This massive data breach could have been prevented had Defendants taken the necessary and reasonable precautions to protect its users' information by, for example, encrypting the data entrusted to it by its users on a database level so that any information hacked and downloaded appeared in the encrypted format," the complaint reads.

"Defendants were aware or should have been aware of the need to secure users' information, especially in light of the recent rise of massive security breaches on the Internet and the fact that the information contained on its servers is particularly sensitive."

ALM is already facing a class-action lawsuit in its home country of Canada. The Toronto-based company was hit last week with a class-action suit filed on behalf of 50 Canadian users exposed by the dump. ®

Broader topics

Narrower topics


Other stories you might like

  • GPL legal battle: Vizio told by judge it will have to answer breach-of-contract claims
    Fine-print crucially deemed contractual agreement as well as copyright license in smartTV source-code case

    The Software Freedom Conservancy (SFC) has won a significant legal victory in its ongoing effort to force Vizio to publish the source code of its SmartCast TV software, which is said to contain GPLv2 and LGPLv2.1 copyleft-licensed components.

    SFC sued Vizio, claiming it was in breach of contract by failing to obey the terms of the GPLv2 and LGPLv2.1 licenses that require source code to be made public when certain conditions are met, and sought declaratory relief on behalf of Vizio TV owners. SFC wanted its breach-of-contract arguments to be heard by the Orange County Superior Court in California, though Vizio kicked the matter up to the district court level in central California where it hoped to avoid the contract issue and defend its corner using just federal copyright law.

    On Friday, Federal District Judge Josephine Staton sided with SFC and granted its motion to send its lawsuit back to superior court. To do so, Judge Staton had to decide whether or not the federal Copyright Act preempted the SFC's breach-of-contract allegations; in the end, she decided it didn't.

    Continue reading
  • US brings first-of-its-kind criminal charges of Bitcoin-based sanctions-busting
    Citizen allegedly moved $10m-plus in BTC into banned nation

    US prosecutors have accused an American citizen of illegally funneling more than $10 million in Bitcoin into an economically sanctioned country.

    It's said the resulting criminal charges of sanctions busting through the use of cryptocurrency are the first of their kind to be brought in the US.

    Under the United States' International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEA), it is illegal for a citizen or institution within the US to transfer funds, directly or indirectly, to a sanctioned country, such as Iran, Cuba, North Korea, or Russia. If there is evidence the IEEA was willfully violated, a criminal case should follow. If an individual or financial exchange was unwittingly involved in evading sanctions, they may be subject to civil action. 

    Continue reading
  • Meta hires network chip guru from Intel: What does this mean for future silicon?
    Why be a customer when you can develop your own custom semiconductors

    Analysis Here's something that should raise eyebrows in the datacenter world: Facebook parent company Meta has hired a veteran networking chip engineer from Intel to lead silicon design efforts in the internet giant's infrastructure hardware engineering group.

    Jon Dama started as director of silicon in May for Meta's infrastructure hardware group, a role that has him "responsible for several design teams innovating the datacenter for scale," according to his LinkedIn profile. In a blurb, Dama indicated that a team is already in place at Meta, and he hopes to "scale the next several doublings of data processing" with them.

    Though we couldn't confirm it, we think it's likely that Dama is reporting to Alexis Bjorlin, Meta's vice president of infrastructure hardware who previously worked with Dama when she was general manager of Intel's Connectivity group before serving a two-year stint at Broadcom.

    Continue reading
  • Lithium production needs investment to keep pace with battery demand
    Report says $42b will need to be poured into industry over next decade

    Growing demand for lithium for batteries means the sector will need $42 billion of investment to meet the anticipated level of orders by the end of the decade, according to a report.

    Lithium is used in batteries that power smartphones and laptops, but there is also rising use in electric vehicles which is putting additional pressure on supplies.

    The report, Benchmark Mineral Intelligence, predicts that demand will reach 2.4 million tons of lithium carbonate equivalent by 2030, roughly four times the 600,000 tons of lithium forecast to be produced this year.

    Continue reading
  • Cars in driver-assist mode hit a third of cyclists, all oncoming cars in tests
    Still think we're ready for that autonomous future?

    Autonomous cars may be further away than believed. Testing of three leading systems found they hit a third of cyclists, and failed to avoid any oncoming cars.

    The tests [PDF] performed by the American Automobile Association (AAA) looked at three vehicles: a 2021 Hyundai Santa Fe with Highway Driving Assist; a 2021 Subaru Forester with EyeSight; and a 2020 Tesla Model 3 with Autopilot.

    According to the AAA, all three systems represent the second of five autonomous driving levels, which require drivers to maintain alertness at all times to seize control from the computer when needed. There are no semi-autonomous cars generally available to the public that are able to operate above level two.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022