Google Images: EU Commish opens new front against Chocolate Factory

Latest RFIs ask awkward questions about copyright

In its latest round of questions sent to rivals regarding the activities and workings of Google, the European Commission has turned the spotlight on the search giant’s image grabbing facilities.

Its most recent questionnaires (RFIs, or requests for information) contain five pages of detailed questions on the issue, revealed one recipient to El Reg this week.

One question asks if companies can exert control over the use of their images on Google Images “without the need to entirely prohibit their use”. The source described Google’s activity as a “systematic disrespect of copyright as an anti-competitive weapon”.

The competition case against the search monster has rumbled on for more than five years, but took on more impetus this year when the new EU Competition Chief Margrethe Vestager sent an official charge sheet to the Chocolate Factory in April.

Google was charged with favouring its own comparison shopping services in search. But the original complaints also included allegations of content scraping – that’s copying to you and me – exclusivity in its agreements with advertising partners, and undue restrictions on advertisers’ ability to use competing advertising platforms.

However, although Google is accused of both content scraping and preferring its own services in search, the issue of image search had not previously been addressed.

Google is preparing its response to a wide array of allegations and concerns raised by the Commish, and had nothing more to add when contacted by The Register. It was recently given an extension until 31 August to respond to the charge sheet sent in April.

Getty Images was formally registered as an “interested third party” in the investigation in June, after it complained that changes to Google’s image search interface in 2013 saw large-format, high-resolution imagery scraped from third parties.

“Google has succeeded in driving additional traffic to itself and created a captive environment that ensures that traffic on Google almost never diverts to the source sites of the images,” Getty said.

With Google holding around 90 per cent of the image search market in the EU, Getty argues that Google Images’ display of photos from sites and publishers, instead of original licensed content, is also bad for consumers.

CEPIC (Centre of the Picture Industry) has also received an RFI – more than 20 months after it lodged its complaint in November 2013. Executive Director Sylvie Fodor said its position remains the same.

“Our view is that the best copyright laws are ineffective on an anti-competitive market as there is no level playing field between stakeholders. Google Images benefits from the visual content for free; however, since introduction of the latest Google Images features, traffic on the image source websites has dropped,” she said. ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021