They’re FAT. They’re ROUND. They’re worth almost a POUND. Smart waaatch, smart waaatch

Samsung, world+dog unveil more wrist jobs


IFA 2015 Samsung teased its Gear S2 smartwatch at IFA on Thursday night. Like others I’ve seen here, it looks really handsome: expensive, well made, and well designed. Makers now realise they have to look like luxury goods to justify the price. But the Gear S2 is no exception to the fundamental challenge they all face.

They’re all, still, a solution looking for a problem to fix. Which isn’t exactly news.

Apple sold more Watches in a day than Android Wear vendors shifted in a year. And even Apple is struggling to convince us that it’s a must-buy. Ben Evans' recent “counterintuitive” defence of the smartwatch concept, justified it by its marginal convenience, is really a reminder that we can get the same utility from a Pebble.

Evans works for the noisy Silicon Valley speculator Andreessen Horowitz, which bet big (stupidly big, in fact) on Google Glass. Sunny-side-up analysts – such as IHS, quoted here – think Apple is “educating consumers”.

But what if the consumers are already educated, thank you very much, and don’t simply find £400 of utility from a demanding new piece of gadgetry? Perhaps, rather than the public missing something obvious, they're well aware of the pros and cons.

Here at IFA new watches appeared from, among others, Samsung, Motorola, Huawei and Sony. Sony’s Wena is by far the most unusual and interesting, and is completely at odds with the rest of the industry. Wena is an employee skunkworks project (that moves the “smart” part to the bracelet – the watch is a conventional analogue timepiece. The bracelet will have NFC and notify you via vibrations and an LED light. It will only be available in Japan from next spring.

Sony Wena smartwatch

Sony's Wena smartwatch will

It’s basically an admission that everyone has got it wrong, and that if payments and notifications are all people want, you don’t need a quad-core processor and power guzzling display to deliver them.

Oh Sammy, what can the matter be?

On to the Gear S2, which is much better than Samsung’s previous efforts. It’s using Samsung's own Tizen but impressively, has more apps than Wear. The S2’s major “innovation” (I use the term generously) is a rotating bezel, giving you three input methods: buttons, screentaps, and the bezel dial. Perhaps that’s one too many.

Samsung Gear 2 smartwatch

Twiddler: You can rotate the Gear S2's bezel, and that's an innovation these days

The conventional wisdom is that Samsung has a struggle to maintain a platform when Google and Apple are already entrenched. But last night's launch showed it already has half a yard's lead, and perhaps it's quality, not quantity, that counts for smartphone apps? Perhaps you only need a few key ones – the rest will be on your phone anyway. Samsung has done a decent job with developers, for sure.

Huawei the lads

Huawei spent a fortune on catwalk models to launch the watch it announced months ago. Like the swanky LG Urbane, it looks great – both companies realising that tech on its own isn’t enough to sell a smartwatch. But like the Urbane, it’s simply bog standard Android Wear inside.

Huawei Watch

The Huawei Watch, as first announced back in March

So where does this leave us? I don’t anticipate Apple's, or any of these watches, to break through beyond a niche. The luxury watch business looks impervious to this kind of clumsy “disruption”. I expect niche products like Fitbit, Pebble and TomTom to continue to keep afloat, while something completely left-field, like the Wena but not the Wena, may make more headway.

But so far, I haven’t seen what this might be. ®


Other stories you might like

  • It's 2022 and there are still malware-laden PDFs in emails exploiting bugs from 2017
    Crafty file names, encrypted malicious code, Office flaws – ah, it's like the Before Times

    HP's cybersecurity folks have uncovered an email campaign that ticks all the boxes: messages with a PDF attached that embeds a Word document that upon opening infects the victim's Windows PC with malware by exploiting a four-year-old code-execution vulnerability in Microsoft Office.

    Booby-trapping a PDF with a malicious Word document goes against the norm of the past 10 years, according to the HP Wolf Security researchers. For a decade, miscreants have preferred Office file formats, such as Word and Excel, to deliver malicious code rather than PDFs, as users are more used to getting and opening .docx and .xlsx files. About 45 percent of malware stopped by HP's threat intelligence team in the first quarter of the year leveraged Office formats.

    "The reasons are clear: users are familiar with these file types, the applications used to open them are ubiquitous, and they are suited to social engineering lures," Patrick Schläpfer, malware analyst at HP, explained in a write-up, adding that in this latest campaign, "the malware arrived in a PDF document – a format attackers less commonly use to infect PCs."

    Continue reading
  • New audio server Pipewire coming to next version of Ubuntu
    What does that mean? Better latency and a replacement for PulseAudio

    The next release of Ubuntu, version 22.10 and codenamed Kinetic Kudu, will switch audio servers to the relatively new PipeWire.

    Don't panic. As J M Barrie said: "All of this has happened before, and it will all happen again." Fedora switched to PipeWire in version 34, over a year ago now. Users who aren't pro-level creators or editors of sound and music on Ubuntu may not notice the planned change.

    Currently, most editions of Ubuntu use the PulseAudio server, which it adopted in version 8.04 Hardy Heron, the company's second LTS release. (The Ubuntu Studio edition uses JACK instead.) Fedora 8 also switched to PulseAudio. Before PulseAudio became the standard, many distros used ESD, the Enlightened Sound Daemon, which came out of the Enlightenment project, best known for its desktop.

    Continue reading
  • VMware claims 'bare-metal' performance on virtualized GPUs
    Is... is that why Broadcom wants to buy it?

    The future of high-performance computing will be virtualized, VMware's Uday Kurkure has told The Register.

    Kurkure, the lead engineer for VMware's performance engineering team, has spent the past five years working on ways to virtualize machine-learning workloads running on accelerators. Earlier this month his team reported "near or better than bare-metal performance" for Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) and Mask R-CNN — two popular machine-learning workloads — running on virtualized GPUs (vGPU) connected using Nvidia's NVLink interconnect.

    NVLink enables compute and memory resources to be shared across up to four GPUs over a high-bandwidth mesh fabric operating at 6.25GB/s per lane compared to PCIe 4.0's 2.5GB/s. The interconnect enabled Kurkure's team to pool 160GB of GPU memory from the Dell PowerEdge system's four 40GB Nvidia A100 SXM GPUs.

    Continue reading
  • Nvidia promises annual updates across CPU, GPU, and DPU lines
    Arm one year, x86 the next, and always faster than a certain chip shop that still can't ship even one standalone GPU

    Computex Nvidia's push deeper into enterprise computing will see its practice of introducing a new GPU architecture every two years brought to its CPUs and data processing units (DPUs, aka SmartNICs).

    Speaking on the company's pre-recorded keynote released to coincide with the Computex exhibition in Taiwan this week, senior vice president for hardware engineering Brian Kelleher spoke of the company's "reputation for unmatched execution on silicon." That's language that needs to be considered in the context of Intel, an Nvidia rival, again delaying a planned entry to the discrete GPU market.

    "We will extend our execution excellence and give each of our chip architectures a two-year rhythm," Kelleher added.

    Continue reading
  • Amazon puts 'creepy' AI cameras in UK delivery vans
    Big Bezos is watching you

    Amazon is reportedly installing AI-powered cameras in delivery vans to keep tabs on its drivers in the UK.

    The technology was first deployed, with numerous errors that reportedly denied drivers' bonuses after malfunctions, in the US. Last year, the internet giant produced a corporate video detailing how the cameras monitor drivers' driving behavior for safety reasons. The same system is now apparently being rolled out to vehicles in the UK. 

    Multiple camera lenses are placed under the front mirror. One is directed at the person behind the wheel, one is facing the road, and two are located on either side to provide a wider view. The cameras are monitored by software built by Netradyne, a computer-vision startup focused on driver safety. This code uses machine-learning algorithms to figure out what's going on in and around the vehicle.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022