Fast, wireless access to Tor? Just maybe

Watch blocked programs while recharging your phone – is this for real?

Portable Tor routers have a serious image problem. But one of only two companies to have actually done it right plans to fix that.Should you believe the hype this time around? Quite possibly, yes.

It was only a year ago that the tech community got excited about the idea of a small, lightweight router that would connect you with the Tor anonymizing service. Plug-and-play. No installing software or complex configurations.

Unfortunately, the Anonabox turned out to have some fundamental flaws, not least of which were its founders' habit of being less than truthful about their "custom" hardware and the product's failure to encrypt traffic.

The Anonabox finally made it onto the market after suffering an epic meltdown, and by banking US$600,000, it sparked a series of blunder-prone projects. There was TorFi, which was pulled off Kickstarter and disappeared; Project Sierra, which raised just $6,000 of a $150,000 goal; and Cloak, which raised just £7,000 of its £65,000 ($100,000) goal.

Also offering private browsing is USB plugin Wemagin, which did raise sufficient funds but last month started offering refunds, having completely missed its April shipping date. It still hasn't shipped.

And then there were two products that avoided scandal: Safeplug and Invizbox. These are both essentially the same: you plug a small box into your home router using an Ethernet cable, and then connect either wirelessly or through another Ethernet cable to the box. The box connects to the Tor network and away you go. They both cost $49.

But here's the rub: Even though both these products do what that say they will, they still have limited use. Why? Because a Tor router alone will not provide you with the kind of privacy that you clearly want if you are prepared to spend $50 on a piece of equipment just to get more privacy.

For one, if you are using your usual browser in the usual way, you are likely providing your IP address to websites even if you are running through Tor routers.

There is JavaScript, for one. Turn that off. If you are not going through HTTPS or SSL secure websites, you are also likely exposing your information. And if you aren't actively blocking ads, you are also likely exposing your data. And then there is the WebRTC bug in Firefox and Chrome that exposes your IP address.

What's more, the Tor network is slow – and often, really slow. Jumping between all those different relays takes a toll. Instant messaging and Skype are therefore out.

Many websites won't let you access content without JavaScript running. And the fact that you are actually using the Tor network is often visible, which has given many websites the option to cut you off if you are.

The BBC, for example, notes: "If you are using a Tor network you will not be able to play programmes in BBC iPlayer." And if a website is using CloudFlare to protect itself, you may find yourself forced to fill in a CAPTCHA just to gain access to a website.

It makes you wonder what's the point of having a Tor router at all.

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • North Korea pulled in $400m in cryptocurrency heists last year – report

    Plus: FIFA 22 players lose their identity and Texas gets phony QR codes

    In brief Thieves operating for the North Korean government made off with almost $400m in digicash last year in a concerted attack to steal and launder as much currency as they could.

    A report from blockchain biz Chainalysis found that attackers were going after investment houses and currency exchanges in a bid to purloin funds and send them back to the Glorious Leader's coffers. They then use mixing software to make masses of micropayments to new wallets, before consolidating them all again into a new account and moving the funds.

    Bitcoin used to be a top target but Ether is now the most stolen currency, say the researchers, accounting for 58 per cent of the funds filched. Bitcoin accounted for just 20 per cent, a fall of more than 50 per cent since 2019 - although part of the reason might be that they are now so valuable people are taking more care with them.

    Continue reading
  • Tesla Full Self-Driving videos prompt California's DMV to rethink policy on accidents

    Plus: AI systems can identify different chess players by their moves and more

    In brief California’s Department of Motor Vehicles said it’s “revisiting” its opinion of whether Tesla’s so-called Full Self-Driving feature needs more oversight after a series of videos demonstrate how the technology can be dangerous.

    “Recent software updates, videos showing dangerous use of that technology, open investigations by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and the opinions of other experts in this space,” have made the DMV think twice about Tesla, according to a letter sent to California’s Senator Lena Gonzalez (D-Long Beach), chair of the Senate’s transportation committee, and first reported by the LA Times.

    Tesla isn’t required to report the number of crashes to California’s DMV unlike other self-driving car companies like Waymo or Cruise because it operates at lower levels of autonomy and requires human supervision. But that may change after videos like drivers having to take over to avoid accidentally swerving into pedestrians crossing the road or failing to detect a truck in the middle of the road continue circulating.

    Continue reading
  • Alien life on Super-Earth can survive longer than us due to long-lasting protection from cosmic rays

    Laser experiments show their magnetic fields shielding their surfaces from radiation last longer

    Life on Super-Earths may have more time to develop and evolve, thanks to their long-lasting magnetic fields protecting them against harmful cosmic rays, according to new research published in Science.

    Space is a hazardous environment. Streams of charged particles traveling at very close to the speed of light, ejected from stars and distant galaxies, bombard planets. The intense radiation can strip atmospheres and cause oceans on planetary surfaces to dry up over time, leaving them arid and incapable of supporting habitable life. Cosmic rays, however, are deflected away from Earth, however, since it’s shielded by its magnetic field.

    Now, a team of researchers led by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) believe that Super-Earths - planets that are more massive than Earth but less than Neptune - may have magnetic fields too. Their defensive bubbles, in fact, are estimated to stay intact for longer than the one around Earth, meaning life on their surfaces will have more time to develop and survive.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022