Furious LastPass fans fear password wrangler's fate amid LogMeIn's gobble

Firm tells users to stop sweating it over $125m buyout


LastPass has been acquired by LogMeIn, and people are deeply unhappy about the deal.

The password manager announced on Friday that it was being gobbled up by the remote-desktop software biz LogMeIn for $125m. It's expected that the deal will close over the next several weeks.

LogMeIn didn't provide details about what it would do with LastPass, but did say the password vault could be integrated with its previously acquired Meldium password manager.

"We believe this transaction instantly gives us a market-leading position in password management, while also providing a highly favorable foundation for delivering the next generation of identity and access management solutions to individuals, teams, and companies," LogMeIn CEO Michael Simon said.

Shortly after news of the buyout broke, LastPass fans quickly began complaining about their beloved password vault joining forces with LogMeIn. The LastPass forum has been beset with angry folks voicing their displeasure.

"I simply will not have anything to do with LogMeIn and will now start looking for an alternative," wrote one user. "It's too bad, as I really appreciate LastPass and its multi-platform functionality and am/was a Premium subscriber."

"Can't think of anything worse for LastPass. What's the best alternative now?" asked another. "I shudder at the thought of LogMeIn having ANY details of mine. Ever."

The outpouring of anger drove LastPass chief Joe Siegrist to issue a statement to calm down his disgruntled peeps.

"First of all, we (LogMeIn/LastPass) have no plans to change our existing business model," he said. "Secondly, this acquisition provides us with access to resources that will enable us to innovate faster, as we continue to strive to deliver an even better product than the one you have come to know and love."

Many, however, have already begun making plans to look elsewhere for their password lockers. If you're wondering why LogMeIn has such a bad rep, here's some previous coverage for starters. ®

Similar topics

Narrower topics


Other stories you might like

  • Venezuelan cardiologist charged with designing and selling ransomware
    If his surgery was as bad as his opsec, this chap has caused a lot of trouble

    The US Attorney’s Office has charged a 55-year-old cardiologist with creating and selling ransomware and profiting from revenue-share agreements with criminals who deployed his product.

    A complaint [PDF] filed on May 16th in the US District Court, Eastern District of New York, alleges that Moises Luis Zagala Gonzalez – aka “Nosophoros,” “Aesculapius” and “Nebuchadnezzar” – created a ransomware builder known as “Thanos”, and ransomware named “Jigsaw v. 2”.

    The self-taught coder and qualified cardiologist advertised the ransomware in dark corners of the web, then licensed it ransomware to crooks for either $500 or $800 a month. He also ran an affiliate network that offered the chance to run Thanos to build custom ransomware, in return for a share of profits.

    Continue reading
  • China reveals its top five sources of online fraud
    'Brushing' tops the list, as quantity of forbidden content continue to rise

    China’s Ministry of Public Security has revealed the five most prevalent types of fraud perpetrated online or by phone.

    The e-commerce scam known as “brushing” topped the list and accounted for around a third of all internet fraud activity in China. Brushing sees victims lured into making payment for goods that may not be delivered, or are only delivered after buyers are asked to perform several other online tasks that may include downloading dodgy apps and/or establishing e-commerce profiles. Victims can find themselves being asked to pay more than the original price for goods, or denied promised rebates.

    Brushing has also seen e-commerce providers send victims small items they never ordered, using profiles victims did not create or control. Dodgy vendors use that tactic to then write themselves glowing product reviews that increase their visibility on marketplace platforms.

    Continue reading
  • Oracle really does owe HPE $3b after Supreme Court snub
    Appeal petition as doomed as the Itanic chips at the heart of decade-long drama

    The US Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear Oracle's appeal to overturn a ruling ordering the IT giant to pay $3 billion in damages for violating a decades-old contract agreement.

    In June 2011, back when HPE had not yet split from HP, the biz sued Oracle for refusing to add Itanium support to its database software. HP alleged Big Red had violated a contract agreement by not doing so, though Oracle claimed it explicitly refused requests to support Intel's Itanium processors at the time.

    A lengthy legal battle ensued. Oracle was ordered to cough up $3 billion in damages in a jury trial, and appealed the decision all the way to the highest judges in America. Now, the Supreme Court has declined its petition.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022