US senators lean on ICANN, tell it to quit squirming and open up

Letter comes as organization meets to decide changes


Two leading US senators have warned domain name overseer ICANN to stop resisting accountability changes in return for control over the internet's DNS.

John Thune, chairman of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Technology, and ranking member Brian Schatz signed a letter [PDF] warning that without "significant accountability reforms that empower the community," Congress will not support the transition of the IANA contract from the US government to ICANN.

"In legislation, letters, and hearings, we have called for robust accountability reforms to ICANN as a necessary pre-condition to any possible lANA transition," it notes. "Our support for these reforms has not wavered."

Thune and Schatz were cosponsors of the recent Dotcom Act that gives Congress a 30-day review window of the transition plan. As such, Congress will have final say over the move.

The reason for the letter is that after a year of work by an internet community working group, the ICANN Board has refused to accept its core recommendation: that the internet community be given a legal right to direct the organization under specific circumstances.

Instead, the Board has heavily pushed its own alternative of putting future disputes through an ICANN-controlled arbitration process under which the Board would be expected, though not obliged, to follow the result.

That approach angered many in the internet community who pointed out that the Board's efforts to maintain its absolute authority were a clear indicator of why there needed to be a legal right to overrule it.

Which side you on?

The letter from Congressmen Thune and Schatz makes it clear on which side they stand: "We understand the Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability has been diligently developing such a package of reforms to ensure that the stakeholder community can exercise the stewardship role historically played by NTIA. Significant accountability reforms that empower the community and are developed by the community are necessary for Congressional support of any such transition."

Their letter follows a similar one sent by European governments and registry operators two weeks ago which noted: "The requirements set forth by the proposals from the CWG and ICG groups [the two community groups working on the IANA transition] can only be met if implemented by credible, enforceable powers in the ultimate interest of all stakeholder groups."

That reference to "credible, enforceable powers" gets back to the same point: which model is introduced to make sure that ICANN cannot continue to put off real reforms into its accountability and transparency, as it has done now for over a decade, and which has led to the organization being compared to football organization FIFA.

Resistance

ICANN's resistance to losing absolute control has been fierce. The organization's legal team has developed and commissioned a series of legal opinions, only some of which have been made public, that paint the proposed changes in the most catastrophic terms.

An early memo argued that any proposal that gave the internet community the right to force the Board to act was in fact illegal. That assertion was struck down when it was revealed ICANN's lawyers had simply chosen to ignore a key part of California corporate law.

A later memo argued that giving the community the collective power to force the Board to act risked giving a small group of people the ability to dissolve the organization altogether. That argument was also swiftly dismissed.

And then in a spreadsheet produced by ICANN's staff, the argument was made that if the transition didn't occur next year, the organization itself would be torn apart and the internet could be taken over by the United Nations.

Such over-the-top efforts have also been made by ICANN Board members. Chair Steve Crocker refused to accept the "single member" model, implying he would rather stay under US government control than sign up to it. Then in an effort to strengthen his hand, he also refused to accept the weaker "designator model."

He wrote: "To be clear, the concerns that the Board raised on the Sole Member model still apply to a Designator model. The Designator model still introduces a new legal structure with powers that are intrinsically beyond the structure we have been using."

Unfortunately for Crocker, a legal analysis done by the working group's independent lawyers revealed that ICANN currently runs under a designator model. So the chair of the organization was in fact refusing to accept his own organization's governance model.

Adding to the sense of farce, Crocker – who has been on the ICANN Board for 14 of its 17 years – and vice-chair Bruce Tonkin then argued that the overseer's supporting organization and advisory committees should not be given a legal right to challenge their decisions because they were not sufficiently representative of the internet community.

That claim led to others pointing out that the Board itself was chosen by the exact same community, and so they were in effect arguing against their own legitimacy.

A third Board member, Chris Disspain, has also been forcefully resisting the change by trying to pick holes in every recommendation while claiming to support its overall goals. His interventions alone have led to dozens of legal opinions and responses for the working group's lawyers. Disspain is expected to take over as ICANN chair when Crocker is obliged to step down in 2016.

The accountability working group hard at work in Dublin

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Who would cross the Bridge of Death? Answer me these questions three! Oh and you'll need two-factor authentication

    I'm not the robot, pal, you are

    Something for the Weekend, Sir? I have failed the Turing test – again. Apparently I am unable to exhibit intelligent behaviour equivalent to that of a human being.

    I am trying to sign into some services I set up ages ago but the Login Lords are having none of it. Quite possibly they are punishing me for having the temerity to disable two-factor authentication, triggering a Spitefulness subroutine which requires them to express their consequential existential crisis by taking it out on me. You're not who you claim to be, they whisper. We think you're lying.

    Great. It's 4:00am and I'm being dissed by uppity electrons 6,000 miles away.

    Continue reading
  • Ouch! When the IT equipment is sound, but the setup is hole-y inappropriate

    Let me draw a picture for you

    On Call The week may be over, but the capacity of users to stick things where they shouldn't is far from exhausted. Welcome to another edition of On Call.

    Today's tale takes us back to when we worked in offices and the concept of "hot desking" was a fashionable thing that did not require the attention of hazmat-clad workers between sessions.

    "Ben," for that is not his name, regularly travelled from city to city as part of his job and, being a conscientious type, popped into company offices along the route to deal with any callouts. He and a colleague would arrive early in the morning to diagnose complaints and deal with IT issues faced by staff.

    Continue reading
  • UK cuts ribbon on OpenRAN security and resiliency testing hubs to make sure kit works with 5G infrastructure

    SONIC the, er, edge... hog?

    The Ministry of Fun* has (virtually) cut the ribbon on its latest 5G testing centre to verify the security and resilience of OpenRAN kit seeking a place among the UK's 5G network infrastructure.

    Backed with £1m of central government taxpayer funding, the SONIC Labs (SmartRAN Open Network Interoperability Centre) in Brighton and London will serve as a testing centre for 5G RAN equipment. The the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) has tipped Digital Catapult and Ofcom to administer the facilities.

    The facility was conceived to accelerate the UK's adoption of OpenRAN technology. Although in its early stages, OpenRAN has been touted as a potential solution to the UK's bleakly homogenous 5G infrastructure.

    Continue reading
  • AWS offers you the opportunity to pay cloud bills before they’ve been issued

    Whatever happened to cloud being a super way to preserve cashflow?

    Amazon Web Services has started allowing its customers to pay in advance.

    As the name implies, a facility called “Advanced Pay” will let you send money to Jeff Bezos before your bill for cloud services has been issued. “Once you add funds to Advance Pay, AWS will automatically use them to pay for your invoices when they become due for payment,” states AWS’s announcement of the service.

    Amazon’s product pages explain that the service only operates in US dollars, and only applies to AWS’s own services — third-party software you buy from the AWS Marketplace is billed as usual.

    Continue reading
  • USA bars imports of Chinese polysilicon due to human rights violations

    Made-in-Xinjiang feedstock for solar panels and semiconductors is under scrutiny

    The USA's Customs and Border Patrol on Thursday banned imports of silica products widely used in solar panels, but also useful for other silicon wafers, on grounds they were made in the Chinese province of Xinjiang, where it is alleged Muslim-minority Uyghur population conduct forced labor.

    A White House statement attributed the actions to the united front against forced labor expressed at the recent G7 summit. The White House stated that bans force Beijing to play fairer, but also are important for competing American businesses that do not exploit workers.

    The ban named one company - Xinjiang-based Hoshine Silicon Industry Co., Ltd and its subsidiaries. All US ports of entry were instructed to detain shipments made by or derived from Hoshine silica.

    Continue reading
  • Google creates 'optimized' Android for one smartphone — that will only be sold in India

    No word on what this means for Android Go or Android One, but Indian mega-carrier Jio is excited about over-the-air updates, Google Assistant and more

    Google has revealed that it has created an “optimised” version of Android designed specifically for one phone — a device to be launched in September by Indian carrier Jio. But the ads giant has not said what the new phone means for its other efforts to create a version of Android tailored to deployment in hardware at prices accessible for people in developing nations.

    “Our teams have optimised a version of our Android OS especially for this device” wrote Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai, adding that the device “will open up new possibilities for millions of new users who will experience the internet for the very first time”.

    Another Google post and Jio’s statement on the matter state that the device will include the Play Store, multi-lingual Google Assistant, over-the-air updates, and an AI-infused camera. Jio’s own apps will be integrated with the Google Assistant.

    Continue reading
  • What’s the big deal with service meshes? Think of them as SDN at Layer 7

    A technical yet demystifying dive into networking tech you can’t avoid

    Systems Approach I remember when I first heard about Service Meshes in 2017, and wondering what the big deal was. Building cloud applications as a graph of microservices was commonplace, and telcos were hard at work inventing yet other ways to chain together virtualized network functions. Service graphs, service chains, service meshes … how many ways do we really need to talk about composing complex systems from a collection of smaller components?

    It wasn’t until I recognised a familiar pattern that I got it: a Service Mesh is just SDN at Layer 7. That’s probably what happens when SDN is the hammer you keep hitting nails with, but I’ve come to believe there is value in that perspective.

    The figure below highlights the similarities between the two scenarios, both of which include a centralised controller that issues directives to a distributed set of connectors (physical/virtual switches in one case, and a sidecar container in the other case) — based on a combination of policy intents from above and monitoring data reported from below. The primary difference is that the SDN controller on the left is controlling L2/3 connectivity and the Service Mesh on the right is controlling L7 connectivity.

    Continue reading
  • Mars race: China dreams of nuclear rockets, manned bases, and space elevators

    We're looking forward to the late 21st-century colony wars

    Over the next quarter century, China wants to set up a permanent base on Mars for "large scale development of the Red Planet," and install a sci-fi carbon-nanotube elevator to shuttle goods between the surface and spacecraft in orbit.

    That’s according to the China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology (CALT), the country’s largest rocket maker, which described a road-map outlining the Middle Kingdom's ambition to explore the unforgiving dust world. Missions to Mars are planned for 2033, 2035, 2037, 2041, and 2043 quite possibly using nuclear-propelled spacecraft.

    In a speech, CALT’s President Wang Xiaojun said his state-owned organization first intends to send robots to Mars to collect samples of material to study back on Earth. These machines will also scout out good locations to develop a human settlement.

    Continue reading
  • Bridging the observability gap

    Trace the journey through all those microservices in the background

    Sponsored In modern IT, visibility is everything. IT admins and Site Reliability Engineers (SRE) survive on their ability to see what's happening in their systems. Unfortunately, as systems get more sophisticated, it has become harder to see what they're doing. That's why the industry is promoting observability as the evolution of existing concepts like monitoring and metrics. Vendors are stepping up with tools to address a growing visibility gap.

    Continue reading
  • Google: About that whole getting rid of third-party cookies thing – we're gonna need another year or so

    Plan to reinvent advertising turns out to be more difficult than expected

    Google, which makes the only major browser not blocking third-party cookies by default, has revised its commitment to phase out third-party cookies by 2022.

    The super-corp's biscotticide is now scheduled to begin in mid-2023 and run through late 2023.

    Third-party cookies refer to tracking files deposited in one's browser when visiting a website that includes code interacting with third-party domains. The firms associated with these domains, typically marketing and analytics businesses, check for the presence of their cookies across different websites and use this information to build marketing profiles and to target ads based on behavior.

    Continue reading
  • These six proposed bipartisan antitrust laws put Big Tech in the cross-hairs – and a House committee just OK'd them

    Well, it's a start

    The US House Judiciary Committee this week approved half a dozen major bipartisan antitrust bills aimed at clamping down on the growing power of Big Tech and its monopolization of some markets.

    The panel, led by Jerry Nadler (D-NY), debated for nearly 30 hours on Wednesday and Thursday to advance the wide-sweeping six-bill package. The proposed laws includes all sorts of measures to prevent companies like Google, Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, Facebook, and others from dominating their sectors of the technology industry.

    There was likely plenty of lobbying and other wrangling going on in the back and foreground over the exact wording of the package. For instance, there was a concern by some lawmakers that Microsoft would end up avoiding certain provisions in the proposed acts that would otherwise hit Google and Apple. Tweaks were made – such as removing "mobile" from "mobile operating system" in the fine-print – to ensure no one was wriggling out.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021