Oh no, you're thinking, yet another cookie pop-up. Well, sorry, it's the law. We measure how many people read us, and ensure you see relevant ads, by storing cookies on your device. If you're cool with that, hit “Accept all Cookies”. For more info and to customize your settings, hit “Customize Settings”.

Review and manage your consent

Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them. You can also change your choices at any time, by hitting the “Your Consent Options” link on the site's footer.

Manage Cookie Preferences
  • These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features. Without these cookies we cannot provide you with the service that you expect.

  • These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. They perform functions like preventing the same ad from continuously reappearing, ensuring that ads are properly displayed for advertisers, and in some cases selecting advertisements that are based on your interests.

  • These cookies collect information in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used. They allow us to count visits and traffic sources so that we can measure and improve the performance of our sites. If people say no to these cookies, we do not know how many people have visited and we cannot monitor performance.

See also our Cookie policy and Privacy policy.

This article is more than 1 year old

Oh, OK then: Ireland will probe Max Schrems' Facebook complaints

Euro court verdict meant it couldn't say no any longer

Facebook crusader Max Schrems returned to the Irish courts today to hear the nation’s Data Protection Commissioner (the DPC) solemnly promise that yes, it would investigate data flows out of Europe.

The court ordered the DPC, which had refused to investigate, to pay Schrems' costs.

Four years ago Schrems filed 22 complaints about Facebook with the DPC, because Facebook’s European headquarters are in the Republic. Unsatisfied by the response, he then sued the DPC.

Following the revelations of the USA’s PRISM program, Schrems filed another salvo of lawsuits which culminated in a bombshell verdict by the European Court of Justice two weeks ago.

The ruling had the effect of taking concerns raised by European individuals into the hands of the data protection authorities in each of the EU’s 29 member states. Hence the Irish DPC’s decision that it should look into Schrems’ Facebook complaints after all.

The ECJ invalidated the ‘Safe Harbour’ legal arrangement that US companies have with the European superstate. The court ruled that because of permissive legislation in the USA, and the PRISM programme, Europeans couldn’t be ensured that their data was safe once transferred outside the EU, to the USA. Therefore the legal fudge of ‘Safe Harbour’ – a fudge worked out at EU level – couldn’t be maintained.

“The question of massive and indiscriminate surveillance is a key element of the Court’s analysis,” the Article 29 working group of member states’ DPRs stressed in a statement (pdf) issued on Friday.

Schrems’ NGO, Europe vs Facebook, has a handy timeline of events behind today’s judgement. ®

 

Similar topics

TIP US OFF

Send us news


Other stories you might like