Oh no, you're thinking, yet another cookie pop-up. Well, sorry, it's the law. We measure how many people read us, and ensure you see relevant ads, by storing cookies on your device. If you're cool with that, hit “Accept all Cookies”. For more info and to customize your settings, hit “Customize Settings”.

Review and manage your consent

Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them. You can also change your choices at any time, by hitting the “Your Consent Options” link on the site's footer.

Manage Cookie Preferences
  • These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features. Without these cookies we cannot provide you with the service that you expect.

  • These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. They perform functions like preventing the same ad from continuously reappearing, ensuring that ads are properly displayed for advertisers, and in some cases selecting advertisements that are based on your interests.

  • These cookies collect information in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used. They allow us to count visits and traffic sources so that we can measure and improve the performance of our sites. If people say no to these cookies, we do not know how many people have visited and we cannot monitor performance.

See also our Cookie policy and Privacy policy.

This article is more than 1 year old

UK MPs have right old whinge about ‘defunct’ Wilson Doctrine

Home Secretary: Er, we could spy on you anyway

Parliamentarians have hit out against a ruling by the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT) that GCHQ is allowed to collect the communications of MPs, a move which seemingly ends the so-called Wilson Doctrine. Or does it?

During parliamentary debate this week, Labour MP Chris Bryant said: "Until last Wednesday, it was thought that the Wilson doctrine was still in force."

"Even after the introduction of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, Governments repeatedly made it clear that the Wilson doctrine remained in place ... [but last Wednesday the IPT] revealed that a completely different regime is now in operation under this home secretary," he continued.

"From the evidence given to the tribunal, it is clear that the Wilson Doctrine has been altered beyond recognition without Parliament being told, and that [it is] to all intents and purposes, defunct," added Bryant.

Tory MP David Davis said he was "not impressed by the IPT’s understanding of the technology that is available to the [intelligence] agencies to enable them to sift and limit the damage that is done by their intrusion of privacy".

He said MPs should "not tolerate the government intercepting or interfering in any way with any of our communications."

"[Parliament] should be unsurprised that agencies use their powers to the limit. If I were working for MI5, MI6 or GCHQ, I would use every power that I was given to the limit, just as I would if I were a policeman," he added. "The tendency is to stretch the limits or for those limits gradually to move."

However, Home Secretary Theresa May told MPs there were a "number of misconceptions" about the ruling.

"It seems that there has been an element of confusion about what the Wilson doctrine actually means. On that, let me say first that it cannot be the case that MPs can never be the subject of interception," she said, speaking in House of Commons earlier this week.

"Members of this House are not above the law or beyond the scope of investigatory powers," she added. ®

 

Similar topics

Similar topics

Similar topics

TIP US OFF

Send us news


Other stories you might like