Splunk, Rocana trade blows in blog 'libel' spat

Don't like something on the internet? Why not send a little ‘cease and desist’ order


Data analysis biz Splunk and rival Rocana are going toe-to-toe after a blog post by the latter questioned the ability of the former's products.

The post, headlined "Rocana vs. Splunk: IT Operations Showdown", compared Rocana's gear with Splunk's.

Splunk did not see the funny side in having its package sized up by a smaller competitor. It promptly sent a serious-sounding cease-and-desist letter to the biz, advising it to take down the article.

The demand [PDF] stated: "Splunk welcomes the opportunity to discuss these issues with Rocana to assure itself that Rocana does not tolerate, and will not participate in, acts of false advertising, unfair competition, trade libel and defamation.

"If Rocana does not immediately cease and desist from these acts, then the continuation of this conduct must be considered either to be acts attributable to Rocana and the individuals making the false statements undertaken with conscious disregard of Splunk's rights, or that Rocana has authorized or ratified the wrongful conduct described in this letter."

In response to Splunk, Rocana shot back a letter [PDF] stating it "categorically rejected" each statement Splunk made.

Rocana added: "If Splunk pursues any legal action against Rocana for opportunistic or malicious reasons, Rocana will not back down and will pursue all rights and remedies against Splunk and any affiliated parties."

Isn't this supposed to be the season of good will? The Register has contacted Splunk for further comment. ®

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Splunk dabbles in edgy hardware, lowers data ingestion
    'Puck' hardware demoed with customers including Royal Dutch Shell to address big concern: cost

    Splunk has released a major update to its core data-crunching platform, emphasizing reductions in the quantity of data ingested and therefore the cost of operations.

    It also addresses a few security flaws that may not be fixable in earlier editions. The release is called Splunk 9.0.

    As explained to The Register by Splunk senior vice president Garth Fort, the changes reflect users' concerns that Splunk sucked up so much data that using the application had become very expensive. Fort even cited a joke that did the rounds when Cisco was said to have $20 billion earmarked to spend on Splunk and observers couldn't be sure if that was the sum needed to buy the company or just pay for licences.

    Continue reading
  • SpaceX: 5G expansion could kill US Starlink broadband
    It would be easier to take this complaint seriously if Elon wasn't so Elon

    If the proposed addition of the 12GHz spectrum to 5G goes forward, Starlink broadband terminals across America could be crippled, or so SpaceX has complained. 

    The Elon Musk biz made the claim [PDF] this week in a filing to the FCC, which is considering allowing Dish to operate a 5G service in the 12GHz band (12.2-12.7GHz). This frequency range is also used by Starlink and others to provide over-the-air satellite internet connectivity.

    SpaceX said its own in-house study, conducted in Las Vegas, showed "harmful interference from terrestrial mobile service to SpaceX's Starlink terminals … more than 77 percent of the time, resulting in full outages 74 percent of the time." It also claimed the interference will extend to a minimum of 13 miles from base stations. In other words, if Dish gets to use these frequencies in the US, it'll render nearby Starlink terminals useless through wireless interference, it was claimed.

    Continue reading
  • DMCA can't be used to sidestep First Amendment, court rules
    Anonymous speech protections apply online too, and copyright can't diminish that

    It's been a good week for free speech advocates as a judge ruled that copyright law cannot be used to circumvent First Amendment anonymity protections.

    The decision from the US District Court for the Northern District of California overturns a previous ruling that compelled Twitter to unmask an anonymous user accused of violating the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). 

    The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), which filed a joint amicus brief with the ACLU in support of Twitter's position, said the ruling confirms "that copyright holders issuing subpoenas under the DMCA must still meet the Constitution's test before identifying anonymous speakers." 

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022