Oh no, you're thinking, yet another cookie pop-up. Well, sorry, it's the law. We measure how many people read us, and ensure you see relevant ads, by storing cookies on your device. If you're cool with that, hit “Accept all Cookies”. For more info and to customize your settings, hit “Customize Settings”.

Review and manage your consent

Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them. You can also change your choices at any time, by hitting the “Your Consent Options” link on the site's footer.

Manage Cookie Preferences
  • These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features. Without these cookies we cannot provide you with the service that you expect.

  • These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. They perform functions like preventing the same ad from continuously reappearing, ensuring that ads are properly displayed for advertisers, and in some cases selecting advertisements that are based on your interests.

  • These cookies collect information in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used. They allow us to count visits and traffic sources so that we can measure and improve the performance of our sites. If people say no to these cookies, we do not know how many people have visited and we cannot monitor performance.

See also our Cookie policy and Privacy policy.

This article is more than 1 year old

Australia's smut-shocked senators seek net censorship (again)

Politicians worry pr-n's getting nastier, so fire up committee to learn how just how nasty

A perennial silly season story has resurfaced for the umpteenth time, with a cross-party gaggle of Australian senators fretting about Internet pornography.

A motion passed nearly unnoticed by the Senate last week will establish an inquiry into the impact of pornography on Australian children. The full motion, here, was backed by the Australian Labor Party's Senator Joe Bullock, the Democratic Labor Party's John Madigan, and Liberals Joanna Lindgren and Chris Back.

The motion claims pornography is easy to get online, and is becoming more violent (for which “citation needed” might be a reasonable response).

It calls on the Environment and Communications Legislation Committee to hold an inquiry, with a December 2016 report date, looking at the trend of children's consumption of porn, how various jurisdictions handle this, and what measures could be implemented in Australia.

Australia already has a block-list administered by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA). Under that regime, the ACMA can order a take-down of material that the Office of Film and Literature Classification considers “refused classification”.

The ACMA's footprint does not, naturally enough, extend overseas, which makes the Senate's motion look like there will be renewed calls in 2016 for some kind of smut-filter applied to the Australian Internet. ®

 

Similar topics

Similar topics

Similar topics

TIP US OFF

Send us news


Other stories you might like