Janet pulls open network info for good after DDoSers exploit it

'Unfortunate' move considered 'necessary to protect' online academic brains trust

Exclusive Jisc is permanently removing open public access to Janet (the UK government-funded educational network) information, The Register can reveal, after concluding that such access has been exploited to hobble the service.

The move, alongside several other large infrastructural changes – which the administrators have asked The Register not to publish for security and insurance reasons – followed a sustained reflective DDoS attack, causing Janet significant problems between the 1 December and 8 December.

Tim Kidd, executive director at Jisc – formerly the Joint Information Systems Committee, the non-departmental public body in the UK which administrates Janet – explained the decision to block diagnostic facilities (such as traceroute) to The Register.

Kidd told us that as the attacks were typical of reflective DDoS, and said the network's engineers began to suspect "that the visible aspects of Janet alongside public updates via Twitter and other channels were being used to inform the attacks".

Following this, Kidd told us, Jisc began to institute changes affecting customers access to such information.

"While it is unfortunate – and certainly we’re well aware of how valuable our customers found some of our network information being openly available for diagnostics – it was a necessary step to protect the network," Kidd said of the move, before adding:

I would also stress that work is already under way to offer an alternative solution, which would still allow customers to easily view end-to-end availability and ensure excellent performance.

Details of the attack show it did not utilise the same methods as those targeting Protonmail earlier this year, although at times the nuisance resource requests did crash in at a similar 100Gbps.

Asked if disabling such access would be certain to prevent future attacks, Kidd was hesitant: “Of course in any security incident you can never offer absolute certainly.”

“What we can say – at what is still a very early stage – is that the measures we have put in place are working effectively and customers do not appear to have received any further disruption,” offered Kidd. “Our efforts also continue to further secure the network and reduce the impact of future attacks. We remain, as I say, vigilant but cautiously optimistic.”

Kidd acknowledged that “the Janet network is used for a wide range of teaching, learning and research activities. Many of these are very specialised with extremely high data flows. We have worked hard to ensure that the measures we put in place will not adversely affect the pursuit of research and education in the UK".

"Our security team and engineers are working closely on future enhancements to the processes we have developed during these attacks," Kidd concluded. "These will make our network stronger. We will also be sharing this information with our network contacts to help them improve the resilience of their connection, such as helping them to move off any less appropriately configured services.” ®

Similar topics

Broader topics

Other stories you might like

  • IT staffing, recruitment biz settles claims it discriminated against Americans
    Foreign workers favored over US residents because that's what clients wanted, allegedly

    Amtex Systems Incorporated, an IT staffing and recruiting firm based in New York City, has agreed to settle claims it discriminated against American workers because company clients wanted workers with temporary visas.

    The US Department of Justice on Wednesday announced the agreement, which followed from a US citizen filing a discrimination complaint with the DoJ's Civil Rights Division’s Immigrant and Employee Rights Section (IER).

    "IT staffing agencies cannot unlawfully exclude applicants or impose additional burdens because of someone’s citizenship or immigration status," said Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, in a statement. "The Civil Rights Division is committed to enforcing the law to ensure that job applicants, including US workers, are protected from unlawful discrimination."

    Continue reading
  • Will this be one of the world's first RISC-V laptops?
    A sneak peek at a notebook that could be revealed this year

    Pic As Apple and Qualcomm push for more Arm adoption in the notebook space, we have come across a photo of what could become one of the world's first laptops to use the open-source RISC-V instruction set architecture.

    In an interview with The Register, Calista Redmond, CEO of RISC-V International, signaled we will see a RISC-V laptop revealed sometime this year as the ISA's governing body works to garner more financial and development support from large companies.

    It turns out Philipp Tomsich, chair of RISC-V International's software committee, dangled a photo of what could likely be the laptop in question earlier this month in front of RISC-V Week attendees in Paris.

    Continue reading
  • Did ID.me hoodwink Americans with IRS facial-recognition tech, senators ask
    Biz tells us: Won't someone please think of the ... fraud we've stopped

    Democrat senators want the FTC to investigate "evidence of deceptive statements" made by ID.me regarding the facial-recognition technology it controversially built for Uncle Sam.

    ID.me made headlines this year when the IRS said US taxpayers would have to enroll in the startup's facial-recognition system to access their tax records in the future. After a public backlash, the IRS reconsidered its plans, and said taxpayers could choose non-biometric methods to verify their identity with the agency online.

    Just before the IRS controversy, ID.me said it uses one-to-one face comparisons. "Our one-to-one face match is comparable to taking a selfie to unlock a smartphone. ID.me does not use one-to-many facial recognition, which is more complex and problematic. Further, privacy is core to our mission and we do not sell the personal information of our users," it said in January.

    Continue reading
  • Meet Wizard Spider, the multimillion-dollar gang behind Conti, Ryuk malware
    Russia-linked crime-as-a-service crew is rich, professional – and investing in R&D

    Analysis Wizard Spider, the Russia-linked crew behind high-profile malware Conti, Ryuk and Trickbot, has grown over the past five years into a multimillion-dollar organization that has built a corporate-like operating model, a year-long study has found.

    In a technical report this week, the folks at Prodaft, which has been tracking the cybercrime gang since 2021, outlined its own findings on Wizard Spider, supplemented by info that leaked about the Conti operation in February after the crooks publicly sided with Russia during the illegal invasion of Ukraine.

    What Prodaft found was a gang sitting on assets worth hundreds of millions of dollars funneled from multiple sophisticated malware variants. Wizard Spider, we're told, runs as a business with a complex network of subgroups and teams that target specific types of software, and has associations with other well-known miscreants, including those behind REvil and Qbot (also known as Qakbot or Pinkslipbot).

    Continue reading
  • Supreme Court urged to halt 'unconstitutional' Texas content-no-moderation law
    Everyone's entitled to a viewpoint but what's your viewpoint on what exactly is and isn't a viewpoint?

    A coalition of advocacy groups on Tuesday asked the US Supreme Court to block Texas' social media law HB 20 after the US Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals last week lifted a preliminary injunction that had kept it from taking effect.

    The Lone Star State law, which forbids large social media platforms from moderating content that's "lawful-but-awful," as advocacy group the Center for Democracy and Technology puts it, was approved last September by Governor Greg Abbott (R). It was immediately challenged in court and the judge hearing the case imposed a preliminary injunction, preventing the legislation from being enforced, on the basis that the trade groups opposing it – NetChoice and CCIA – were likely to prevail.

    But that injunction was lifted on appeal. That case continues to be litigated, but thanks to the Fifth Circuit, HB 20 can be enforced even as its constitutionality remains in dispute, hence the coalition's application [PDF] this month to the Supreme Court.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022