Here at last: That big data benchmark from TPC

First end-to-end database virtualisation test is also here


After steady pre-release publicity, the Transaction Processing Performance Council (TPC) has released new Big Data and virtualisation benchmarks.

The TPC is a non-profit corporation founded to define transaction processing and database benchmarks and to disseminate objective, verifiable TPC performance data to the industry. It currently has 22 full members*. The benchmark tests are run by suppliers and result in performance measures that enable different suppliers’ systems to be compared objectively.

The two new TPC benchmarks are:

  • TPC-DS 2.0 - the first industry standard benchmark for SQL-based Big Data systems, including Hadoop and Apache Spark-based systems, as well as relational database management systems (RDBMSs).
  • TPCx-V - the first end-to-end database virtualisation benchmark publicly available via downloadable kit, and measures the performance of a server running virtualised databases.

TPCx-V measures the performance of a server running virtualised databases, and models properties of servers such as multiple virtual machines (VMs) running at different load demand levels. It has a mix of Online Transaction Processing (OLTP) and Decision Support Systems (DSS) workloads, and uses databases of different sizes and load levels.

TPCx_V_Diagram

It simulates large fluctuations in the load levels within virtual machines, said to be representative of load elasticity in real-life cloud environments.

TPC-DS 2.0 is designed to to model the decision support functions of a retail product supplier, and measures query response time, query throughput, data integration performance and data load for a given  system configuration. It executes SQL queries of various operational requirements and complexities (eg, ad hoc, reporting, iterative OLAP and data mining), and periodically synchronises with source databases through maintenance functions.

Find out more about TPC-DS 2.0 here and TPCx-V here. TPCx-V is publicly available via downloadable kit and includes both self-audit and self-validation tools.

There are no performance results available for these two benchmarks but, hopefully, there soon will be.

The TPC is hosting its eighth annual International Technology Conference on Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking, collocated with the 42nd International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB 2016) on September 5, 2016 in New Delhi, India. Its focus will be on benchmarking emerging areas such as Analytics, Cloud and the Internet of Things. ®

* The 22 full members are Actian, Cisco, Cloudera, Dell, Fujitsu, HPE, Hitachi, Huawei, IBM, Inspur, Intel, Lenovo, MapR, Microsoft, NEC, Oracle, Pivotal, Red Hat, SAP, Teradata, Unisys and VMware.

There are five associate members: Ideas International, ITOM International Co, San Diego Supercomputer Center, Telecommunications Technology Association and the University of Coimbra.


Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021