YouTube puts T-Mobile US on naughty list for throttling all vids to 480p

No Christmas cheer amid scrap over toll-free streaming and net neutrality


YouTube has waded into the row over T-Mobile US's Binge On service.

Binge On launched in November, and lets people watch unlimited amounts of video from Netflix, Hulu and other selected providers: the streams do not count against subscribers' monthly download caps.

There is a catch, though. These toll-free videos are streamed at 480p resolution.

YouTube refused to join T-Mob's service. This week, the web giant said its videos are being throttled to 480p anyway, and it's furious.

Industry body the Internet Association has put out a statement on Binge On that states: "T-Mobile’s new 'streaming optimization' program appears to involve throttling all video traffic, across all data plans, regardless of network congestion… Reducing data charges for entire classes of applications can be legitimate and benefit consumers, so long as clear notice and choice is provided to service providers and consumers.

"However, a reasonably designed zero-rating program does not include the throttling of traffic for services or consumers that do not participate."

In an interview with the Wall Street Journal, a YouTube spokesman made the same point, saying: "Reducing data charges can be good for users, but it doesn’t justify throttling all video services, especially without explicit user consent."

Hero or zero

The practice of "zero rating", aka toll-free downloads, has become an increasingly contentious issue: a number of big companies, including Facebook, have found ways to provide their services online without it hitting people's wallets due to data usage. The problem with this is: who ultimately pays for these transfers, and what happens to those who don't play ball?

T-Mobile US has 24 companies in its Binge On scheme. In order to limit the amount of data used by its subscribers, it prevents high-definition videos from being streamed. YouTube offers a wide range of resolutions, all the way up to the currently pointless 8K. But you'll be forced onto 480p anyway if you're on T-Mobile US.

With a fast 4G/LTE connection, it is possible to download higher definition video, and many smartphones now can handle 1080p resolution. But at that resolution, the videos will use way more data than 480p copies.

Even before YouTube raised its concerns, T-Mobile US was already under fire for offering the service at all since many fear T-Mob will demand money from videos providers that wish to be a part of Binge On. This could price smaller outfits out of the market, dealing a blow to competition and innovation.

Enter the FCC

That fear of controlled access by operators is what was behind the FCC's Open Internet Order, better known as net neutrality.

The US communications regulator has already sent a letter to T-Mob asking it for more details on the program. (FCC chairman Tom Wheeler had initially described Binge On as "highly innovative and highly competitive.") The watchdog has also sent letter to Comcast and AT&T on the same issue over services they is said to be readying.

"As you may be aware, concerns have been expressed about the Binge On program," the FCC letter to T-Mobile sent earlier this month reads. "For example, some have argued that the technical requirements of the Binge On program may harm innovation by making certain video apps more attractive than others. Others have asserted that the reduction of video quality has harmed some users."

The Internet Association referenced the FCC's letter in its statement, saying that it "applauds the FCC for seeking information on this practice and its potential harm on consumers and online applications and services", adding, "we encourage the FCC to keep examining the details of these practices by Internet access providers."

Meanwhile, the usually outspoken T-Mobile US CEO John Legere has yet to say anything about the controversy, with the company simply pointing requests for information to a tweet from Legere that says T-Mob customers have the ability to turn the feature off. ®


Other stories you might like

  • Tesla driver charged with vehicular manslaughter after deadly Autopilot crash

    Prosecution seems to be first of its kind in America

    A Tesla driver has seemingly become the first person in the US to be charged with vehicular manslaughter for a deadly crash in which the vehicle's Autopilot mode was engaged.

    According to the cops, the driver exited a highway in his Tesla Model S, ran a red light, and smashed into a Honda Civic at an intersection in Gardena, Los Angeles County, in late 2019. A man and woman in the second car were killed. The Tesla driver and a passenger survived and were taken to hospital.

    Prosecutors in California charged Kevin George Aziz Riad, 27, in October last year though details of the case are only just emerging, according to AP on Tuesday. Riad, a limousine service driver, is facing two counts of vehicular manslaughter, and is free on bail after pleading not guilty.

    Continue reading
  • AMD returns to smartphone graphics with new Samsung chip for your pocket computer

    We're back in black

    AMD's GPU technology is returning to mobile handsets with Samsung's Exynos 2200 system-on-chip, which was announced on Tuesday.

    The Exynos 2200 processor, fabricated using a 4nm process, has Armv9 CPU cores and the oddly named Xclipse GPU, which is an adaptation of AMD's RDNA 2 mainstream GPU architecture.

    AMD was in the handheld GPU market until 2009, when it sold the Imageon GPU and handheld business for $65m to Qualcomm, which turned the tech into the Adreno GPU for its Snapdragon family. AMD's Imageon processors were used in devices from Motorola, Panasonic, Palm and others making Windows Mobile handsets.

    Continue reading
  • Big shock: Guy who fled political violence and became rich in tech now struggles to care about political violence

    'I recognize that I come across as lacking empathy,' billionaire VC admits

    Billionaire tech investor and ex-Facebook senior executive Chamath Palihapitiya was publicly blasted after he said nobody really cares about the reported human rights abuse of Uyghur Muslims in China.

    The blunt comments were made during the latest episode of All-In, a podcast in which Palihapitiya chats to investors and entrepreneurs Jason Calacanis, David Sacks, and David Friedberg about technology.

    The group were debating the Biden administration’s response to what's said to be China's crackdown of Uyghur Muslims when Palihapitiya interrupted and said: “Nobody cares about what’s happening to the Uyghurs, okay? ... I’m telling you a very hard ugly truth, okay? Of all the things that I care about … yes, it is below my line.”

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022