Bah humbug. It's Andrew's Phones of the Year

'Tis not the season to be Jolla

Roundup When a blind chimp with a shopping strategy based around a pack of darts can come out of Carphone Warehouse with a decent phone - is there any point giving out awards? I've seen dozens of shiny new things this year - and I do wonder why reviews need to be longer than a few words. Maybe they don't need words at all. Perhaps everyone could do one-line reviews, only using emoji.

Phones. They're almost all good. Stinkers are few and far between. Apple makes its iPhone a bit better each year. "Value Android" isn't an insult any more. So in choosing the highlights I've gone for the unusual, or people who've tried a bit harder, either to please the value midrange market, or done something to diversify a very samey landscape.

Before I do, a word about the platforms. We're basically four down on last year, and two of these had serious backing.

BlackBerry put its BB10 on the backburner; with sales falling to 800,000 a quarter, it had little choice. BlackBerry's first Android device, the "Priv by BlackBerry", was well received. BlackBerry says a further one (or two) BB10 maintenance releases will be issued, but all the work is now focused on its tweaked Android. BB10 turned into a great alternative to iOS and Android - but it was probably doomed from the start (read why here).

Microsoft gave its mobile platform a much reduced profile. It's now a subset of Windows 10 that just happens to run on phones.

Windows Phone has been killed off, with Windows 10 Mobile, which only has a superficial resemblance to WP, the way forward.

I found that even in "released" form, W10M is a hellish beta test - and can't quite believe it was released at all. And I seriously questioned why Microsoft perseveres. But perhaps in a year's time the bugs will be ironed out, and the apps and content services will be poking a wary toe back in the Windows waters.

Two more minor platforms also edged into the background. The wealthy Mozilla Foundation said it would "stop offering Firefox OS smartphones". And Finnish Jolla first pivoted away from hardware, then put half of its staff on gardening leave. The company says it received pre-Xmas investment but without the reluctant gardeners. A Jolla rep described it as a "near death experience".

But what does it matter when Android storms on? To add to the list of mothballed platforms, are "pseudo platforms" that promised much, but didn't deliver in 2015. Cyanogen was on lots of pundits' lists 15 months ago, after Microsoft was reportedly investing (and Google too). But it hasn't become the Google-free that people expected (and that we suppose Microsoft wanted). Any guesses why? Tizen was another ghost at the feast. It's still being developed.

The flagship contenders were also bedevilled by problems with Qualcomm's 810 Snapdragon octocore chip, early versions of which ran hot.

As I wrote in my end-of-year mobile round-up it's all about China. The pace of manufacturing, falling costs, and the demand for SIM-only contracts, has created a vigorous market. This is reflected in my picks here, where value takes precedence over novelty. Flagship fatigue is here to stay.

Onto the plaudits.

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021